OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 101 - 108 of 108.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters Clear All Filters ×
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
"borehole stress"×
Utah FORGE×

Utah FORGE: Phase 1a Tensor Strainmeter Data for the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32

Data from two Tensor Optical Fiber Strainmeters that were operational during Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the April, 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Each csv file contains data from each stimulation stage (stage1, stage2, stage3) for both Phase 1a strainmeter installations (FS01, f...
DeWolf, S. and Murdoch, L. Clemson University
Sep 15, 2022
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 3-2535: Building a 3D Resistivity Model for Simulation and Survey Design of EM Measurements

The included report outlines the creation of three 3D resistivity models that will be used to determine the sensitivity of EM measurements for the hypothetical stimulated reservoir at FORGE as well as for EM survey design. FORGE project 3-2535 is planning on using a casing source ...
Alumbaugh, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Dec 01, 2022
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations

This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area: An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Laboratory Shear Experiments Linking Fault Roughness, Friction, Permeability, and P-Wave Characteristics

This dataset contains results from five laboratory shear experiments on gneiss and granitoid samples from the Utah FORGE site, conducted at Penn State University. The experiments investigate links between fault surface roughness, frictional behavior, permeability, and P-wave acous...
Eijsink, A. et al Pennsylvania State University
Aug 20, 2025
20 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Cape EGS: Seismic Attenuation Profile and DAS Microseismic P-wave Spectra

This dataset contains a 1D P-wave attenuation (Q) profile, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) microseismic P-wave spectra, and derived source parameters from the Delano 1OB well at the Cape Modern geothermal field. The data were collected during a stimulation period from mid-Febru...
Chang, H. et al Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
Mar 17, 2026
7 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Logs

This dataset contains all well logs from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. This includes the mud log, Sanvean Technologies logs, and Schlumberger logs. Please see the file descriptions below for information about each log.
Gilmour, B. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 08, 2021
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: 2023 Large Upscaled Discrete Fracture Network Models

This dataset includes the data and a report on the large upscaled discrete fracture network modeling done for the Utah FORGE project in 2023. The FORGE modeling team is making five discrete fracture network (DFN) realizations of a large reservoir model available to researchers. Th...
Finnila, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 02, 2023
17 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) Data

The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. and Podgorney, R. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 24, 2020
66 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
<< Previous12345
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR provides free access to data generated from projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Geothermal.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service