Search GDR Data
Showing results 1051 - 1075 of 1284.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Sludge XRF
This is an Excel spreadsheet containing the results of X-ray fluorescence from well 56-32 sludge samples. The instrumentation used was a Olympus Vanta M series handheld XRF analyzer. A glass (SiO2) "blank" was analyzed at the beginning and end of each sample batch to detect contam...
Smith, K. Utah Geological Survey
Jul 15, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation and Circulation Fiber Optics Reports Summer, 2024
This zip file contains reports discussing the use of fiber optics during well 16B(78)-32 stimulation and circulation tests in the summer of 2024. The reports cover the collection of strain rate and temperature change data during these well events. Theory, methods, and initial dat...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Sep 25, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Perforation Images and Raw Data
This archive contains raw data of visual and acoustic mapping of perforations in Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 acquired during the August 2024 circulation program. The dataset includes downhole images captured by EV, a downhole visual analytics company, providing visual records of ea...
Saha, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 05, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
High Temperature Evaluation of Tantalum Capacitors Test 1
Tantalum capacitors can provide much higher capacitance at high-temperatures than the ceramic capacitors. This study evaluates selected tantalum capacitors at high temperatures to determine their suitability for you in geothermal field. This data set contains results of the first ...
Cieslewski, G. Sandia National Laboratories
Sep 28, 2014
21 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
21 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Milford Triaxial Test Data and Summary from EGI labs
Six samples were evaluated in unconfined and triaxial compression, their data are included in separate excel spreadsheets, and summarized in the word document. Three samples were plugged along the axis of the core (presumed to be nominally vertical) and three samples were plugged ...
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 01, 2016
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Brady's Geothermal Field DAS Vibroseis Data
The submitted data correspond to the monitored vibrations caused by a vibroseis seismically exciting the ground in the vertical direction and captured by the DAS horizontal and vertical arrays during the PoroTomo Experiment. The data also include a file with the acceleration recor...
Feigl, K. University of Wisconsin
Mar 25, 2016
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Portland DDU Feasibility Study: The Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Portland and Tualatin Basins, Oregon, USA
The Portland and Tualatin basins are part of the Puget-Willamette Lowland in the Cascadia forearc of Oregon and Washington. The Coast Range to the west has undergone Paleogene transtension and Neogene transpression, which is reflected in basin stratigraphy. To better understand th...
Scanlon, D. Portland State University
Jul 29, 2019
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Processed Lab Data for Neural Network-Based Shear Stress Level Prediction
Machine learning can be used to predict fault properties such as shear stress, friction, and time to failure using continuous records of fault zone acoustic emissions. The files are extracted features and labels from lab data (experiment p4679). The features are extracted with a n...
Marone, C. et al Pennsylvania State University
May 14, 2021
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Compilation of Geodetic Data and Estimation of Associated Deformation
Report on possible geodetic signature of the 3 stimulations in April 2022 as well as a comparison with existing InSAR data gathered over the site before, during, and after the stimulation. In geothermal production it is important to understand the existing stress field and the cha...
Vasco, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 29, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Report on Predicting Far-Field Stresses Using Finite Element Modeling and Near-Wellbore Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32
This report presents the far-field stress predictions at two locations along the vertical section of Utah FORGE Well 16A (78)-32 using a physics-based thermo-poro-mechanical model. Three principal stresses in far-field were obtained by solving an inverse problem based on the near-...
Lu, G. et al University of Pittsburgh
Aug 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Walker Ranch 3D Seismic Images
Amplitude images (both vertical and depth slices) extracted from 3D seismic reflection survey over area of Walker Ranch area (adjacent to Raft River). Crossline spacing of 660 feet and inline of 165 feet using a Vibroseis source. Processing included depth migration. Micro-earthqua...
J., R. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mar 01, 2016
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Newberry EGS Seismic Velocity Model
We use ambient noise correlation (ANC) to create a detailed image of the subsurface seismic velocity at the Newberry EGS site down to 5 km. We collected continuous data for the 22 stations in the Newberry network, together with 12 additional stations from the nearby CC, UO and UW ...
Templeton, D. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Oct 01, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: 2023 Induced Seismicity Mitigation Plan
This is the updated Utah FORGE Phase 3B induced seismicity mitigation plan (ISMP) covering the general Utah FORGE area. This new version incorporates newly collected seismic data, including data collected during the 2022 stimulation and a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (...
Pankow, K. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Aug 09, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
BRAD BRDY and BRD1 GPS Station RINEX Files 07-17-2017
Links to URL's with latest time-series of GPS stations BRAD, BRDY and BRD1
Kreemer, C. University of Wisconsin
Jul 17, 2017
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Rock Properties
This is an Excel spreadsheet that contains rock properties from several wells in the Utah FORGE study area. This includes a map of the wells. Data is described in the Final Topical Report included in the resources below.
Gwynn, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 1: Accelerometer orientations
Document describing the methodology used to determine the accelerometers' three-component orientations at the first EGS Collab testbed using Continuous Active-Source Seismic Monitoring (CASSM) data and hodogram analysis.
Original submission: gdr.openei.org/submissions/1166
Hopp, C. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Aug 19, 2020
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Results of Direct Shear Tests on Saturated Joints in Sierra White Granite
This dataset includes an Excel file with the results of direct shear tests to investigate the mechanical and geophysical response of saturated joints. Tests were conducted on induced tension-fractured Sierra White granite joints in a custom water pressurized chamber. The preparati...
Han, K. et al Purdue University
Dec 31, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Video of Utah FORGE Drilling Planning for Production Well 16B(78)-32
This is a YouTube video containing the specifics of well planning for Utah FORGE 16B(78)-32. This well will be drilled as a doublet approximately 300 feet parallel to and above 16A(78)-32 and will be drilled between approximately April 15th and July 17th 2023.
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 03, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Ground Water Level Monitoring Data
Groundwater data around the Utah FORGE site has been collected to determine the piezometric levels and compositional variability. Field measurements in 2020 are designed to obtain and survey new groundwater wells that have been drilled on the distal periphery of the Utah FORGE pro...
Kirby, S. Utah Geological Survey
Sep 30, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Seismic Stations and Wells GPS Survey Data, 2021
This is a CSV spreadsheet containing UTM and Latitude and Longitude coordinates and elevations for Wells 78-32, 58-32, and 16A(78)-32 and BOR1, BOR2, BOR3, FOR2, FOR5, FORK, FORU, and FORW seismic stations. These are from a GPS survey conducted by the Utah Geological Survey in Jun...
Erickson, B. Utah Geological Survey
Jun 30, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Granite Core Thermal Properties Test Results Report (Oct. 2021)
This is a presentaiton from Metarock Laboratories on the thermal properties of Utah FORGE well 58-32 granite core. The presentation includes pictures of core samples, core details for the samples (sample depths and size), sample thermal expansion test results, and radial velocity ...
Laboratories, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 29, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Updated Well, Well Pad, and Seismic Station GPS Coordinates December, 2021
This is a CSV spreadsheet containing UTM and Latitude and Longitude coordinates and elevations for Wells 78-32, 78B-32, 56-32, 58-32, 68-32, and 16A(78)-32 and seismic stations BOR1, BOR2, BOR3, FOR1, FOR2, FOR5, FOR6, FOR 7, FOR8, FORK, FORU, FORW, and FORB. These are from a GPS ...
Erickson, B. Utah Geological Survey
Dec 13, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data 2022
This is a link to the website where Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) seismic data, collected from wells 78-32 and 78B-32 during the Utah FORGE 2022 stimulation, is available for download. The data can be accessed at "Well 16A78-32 2022 Stimulation Seismicity Data" link in the su...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2514: Strain Sensing Array for Deformation Characterization 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Strain Sensing Array to characterize deformation at the FORGE site project by Clemson University, presented by Lawrence Murdoch. The project's objective was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring and interpreting tensor strain data to improve the pe...
Murdoch, L. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 13, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Hydraulic Fracturing Stage 8 Crosswell Strain FDI and Microseismic Presentations April 2024
This is a pair of PowerPoint presentations from Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC. The presentations review work done in April 2024 on crosswell strain fracture driven interactions (FDI) and microseismic event monitoring during hydraulic fracturing in stage 8 of Utah FORGE well 16...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Nov 07, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated