GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs

Publicly accessible License 

The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Technique (GeoRePORT) was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office to assist in identifying and pursuing long-term investment strategies through the development of a resource reporting protocol. GeoRePORT provides scientists and nonscientists a comprehensive and quantitative means of reporting: (1) features intrinsic to geothermal sites (project grade) and (2) maturity of the development (project readiness). Because geothermal feasibility is not determined by any single factor (e.g., temperature, permeability, permitting), a site?s project grade and readiness are evaluated on 12 attributes pertaining to geological, technical, or socio-economic feasibility. In this paper, we present case studies showing how GeoRePORT can be used to compare geological, technical, and socio-economic attributes between geothermal systems. The consistent and objective assessment protocols used in GeoRePORT allow for comparison of project attributes across unique locations and geological settings. GeoRePORT case studies presented here outline the geological, socio-economic, and technical features of four individual geothermal sites: Coso, Chena, Dixie Valley, and White Sands Missile Range. The case studies illustrate the usefulness of GeoRePORT in evaluating project risk and return, identifying gaps in reported data, evaluating R&D impact, and gathering insights on successes and failures as applicable to future projects.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Technique (GeoRePORT) was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office to assist in identifying and pursuing long-term investment strategies through the development of a resource reporting protocol. GeoRePORT provides scientists and nonscientists a comprehensive and quantitative means of reporting: (1) features intrinsic to geothermal sites (project grade) and (2) maturity of the development (project readiness). Because geothermal feasibility is not determined by any single factor (e.g., temperature, permeability, permitting), a site?s project grade and readiness are evaluated on 12 attributes pertaining to geological, technical, or socio-economic feasibility. In this paper, we present case studies showing how GeoRePORT can be used to compare geological, technical, and socio-economic attributes between geothermal systems. The consistent and objective assessment protocols used in GeoRePORT allow for comparison of project attributes across unique locations and geological settings. GeoRePORT case studies presented here outline the geological, socio-economic, and technical features of four individual geothermal sites: Coso, Chena, Dixie Valley, and White Sands Missile Range. The case studies illustrate the usefulness of GeoRePORT in evaluating project risk and return, identifying gaps in reported data, evaluating R&D impact, and gathering insights on successes and failures as applicable to future projects. AU - Kolker, Amanda A2 - Young, Katherine A3 - Dwyer, Stephanie A4 - Bednarek, John A5 - Brandt, Adam A6 - Meade, David DB - Geothermal Data Repository DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory DO - 10.15121/1572362 KW - geothermal KW - energy KW - socio KW - techno KW - social KW - technical KW - economic KW - assessment KW - analysis KW - resource KW - GeoRePORT KW - feasibility KW - case study KW - case studies KW - reporting KW - protocol KW - Dixie Valley KW - Coso KW - Chena KW - WSMR KW - White Sands Missile Range KW - grade KW - exploration KW - project readiness KW - portfolio optimization KW - reporting tool KW - worksheet KW - input LA - English DA - 2019/09/30 PY - 2019 PB - National Renewable Energy Laboratory T1 - GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1572362 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Kolker, Amanda, et al. GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 30 September, 2019, Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1572362.
Kolker, A., Young, K., Dwyer, S., Bednarek, J., Brandt, A., & Meade, D. (2019). GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs. [Data set]. Geothermal Data Repository. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.15121/1572362
Kolker, Amanda, Katherine Young, Stephanie Dwyer, John Bednarek, Adam Brandt, and David Meade. GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, September, 30, 2019. Distributed by Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1572362
@misc{GDR_Dataset_1178, title = {GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs}, author = {Kolker, Amanda and Young, Katherine and Dwyer, Stephanie and Bednarek, John and Brandt, Adam and Meade, David}, abstractNote = {The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Technique (GeoRePORT) was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office to assist in identifying and pursuing long-term investment strategies through the development of a resource reporting protocol. GeoRePORT provides scientists and nonscientists a comprehensive and quantitative means of reporting: (1) features intrinsic to geothermal sites (project grade) and (2) maturity of the development (project readiness). Because geothermal feasibility is not determined by any single factor (e.g., temperature, permeability, permitting), a site?s project grade and readiness are evaluated on 12 attributes pertaining to geological, technical, or socio-economic feasibility. In this paper, we present case studies showing how GeoRePORT can be used to compare geological, technical, and socio-economic attributes between geothermal systems. The consistent and objective assessment protocols used in GeoRePORT allow for comparison of project attributes across unique locations and geological settings. GeoRePORT case studies presented here outline the geological, socio-economic, and technical features of four individual geothermal sites: Coso, Chena, Dixie Valley, and White Sands Missile Range. The case studies illustrate the usefulness of GeoRePORT in evaluating project risk and return, identifying gaps in reported data, evaluating R\&D impact, and gathering insights on successes and failures as applicable to future projects. }, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1178}, year = {2019}, howpublished = {Geothermal Data Repository, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.15121/1572362}, note = {Accessed: 2025-05-03}, doi = {10.15121/1572362} }
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1572362

Details

Data from Sep 30, 2019

Last updated Oct 30, 2019

Submitted Sep 30, 2019

Organization

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Contact

Amanda Kolker

Authors

Amanda Kolker

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Katherine Young

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Stephanie Dwyer

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

John Bednarek

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Adam Brandt

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

David Meade

Navy Geothermal Program

DOE Project Details

Project Name GeoRePORT Protocols and Case Studies

Project Lead Mike Weathers

Project Number FY19 AOP 4675

Share

Submission Downloads