Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data
This submission contains x-ray diffraction data taken from 3,600 to 10,987 feet deep in well 16A(78)-32 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs Geothermal Area as part of the Utah FORGE project. 78 rock samples were taken. Samples are taken in a range of ten feet at 100 foot increments. Mineral abundances are given in weight percent of the sample, with results rounded to the nearest whole number. Fields marked with tr (trace) indicate that mineral is present, but that its abundance calculated from the Rietveld refinement was less than one weight percent; that it was observed in the clay-sized fraction, but not the bulk; and/or that it was observed in low abundance during petrographic analyses. The samples were taken between 10/29/2020 and 12/24/2020 during the drilling of well 16A(78)-32.
Citation Formats
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah. (2021). Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data [data set]. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1811309.
Jones, Clay. Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data. United States: N.p., 29 Jul, 2021. Web. doi: 10.15121/1811309.
Jones, Clay. Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data. United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1811309
Jones, Clay. 2021. "Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data". United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1811309. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1323.
@div{oedi_1323, title = {Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data}, author = {Jones, Clay.}, abstractNote = {This submission contains x-ray diffraction data taken from 3,600 to 10,987 feet deep in well 16A(78)-32 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs Geothermal Area as part of the Utah FORGE project. 78 rock samples were taken. Samples are taken in a range of ten feet at 100 foot increments. Mineral abundances are given in weight percent of the sample, with results rounded to the nearest whole number. Fields marked with tr (trace) indicate that mineral is present, but that its abundance calculated from the Rietveld refinement was less than one weight percent; that it was observed in the clay-sized fraction, but not the bulk; and/or that it was observed in low abundance during petrographic analyses. The samples were taken between 10/29/2020 and 12/24/2020 during the drilling of well 16A(78)-32.}, doi = {10.15121/1811309}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1323}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2021}, month = {07}}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1811309
Details
Data from Jul 29, 2021
Last updated Aug 22, 2024
Submitted Jul 29, 2021
Organization
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Contact
Clay Jones
801.585.7971
Authors
Keywords
geothermal, energy, XRD, X-ray diffraction, Utah FORGE, Well 16A78-32, 16A78-32 XRD, 16A78-32 X-Ray diffraction, x-ray, xray, xray diffraction, EGS, Utah, Well, data, raw data, geology, geological, Roosevelt Hot Springs, Milford, mineral abundanceDOE Project Details
Project Name Utah FORGE
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0007080