Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report

Publicly accessible License 

This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and planned activities. Phase 3B Year 1 site activities focused on the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, seismic monitoring, and data analysis. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE remains to demonstrate the viability of Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) energy development.

Citation Formats

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah. (2023). Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report [data set]. Retrieved from https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523.
Export Citation to RIS
Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, and Simmons, Stuart. Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report. United States: N.p., 09 Aug, 2023. Web. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523.
Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, & Simmons, Stuart. Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report. United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523
Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, and Simmons, Stuart. 2023. "Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report". United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523.
@div{oedi_1523, title = {Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report}, author = {Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, and Simmons, Stuart.}, abstractNote = {This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and planned activities. Phase 3B Year 1 site activities focused on the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, seismic monitoring, and data analysis. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE remains to demonstrate the viability of Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) energy development.}, doi = {}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2023}, month = {08}}

Details

Data from Aug 9, 2023

Last updated Sep 1, 2023

Submitted Aug 9, 2023

Organization

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Contact

Joe Moore

801.585.6931

Authors

Joe Moore

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Phillip Wannamaker

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

John McLennen

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Kris Pankow

University of Utah Seismograph Stations

Gosia Skowron

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Greg Nash

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Clay Jones

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Ben Barker

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Rob Podgorney

Idaho National Laboratory

Stuart Simmons

Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

DOE Project Details

Project Name Utah FORGE

Project Lead Lauren Boyd

Project Number EE0007080

Share

Submission Downloads