Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment
Included are experimental data recorded from shear experiments that specifically explore the link between fluid-injection rate and seismic moment resulting from shear reactivation of laboratory faults. Raw mechanical data from three experiments are included alongside corresponding MATLAB scripts that import and plot the data, as well as use it to calculate shear and normal stress.
Experiments are performed on 2.5-3 inch long granitoid cores from the Utah FORGE EGS demonstration site, containing a single inclined fracture with small-scale roughness added to the fracture surface. The raw data included here were recorded from an aluminum triaxial pressure vessel (TEMCO) configured with three independent servo-controlled pumps, with distilled water used as the working fluid. The pumps control confining pressure, upstream pore pressure, and axial pressure, with each pump connected to a LabView interface to record applied pressures, cumulative injected water volumes, and pump flow rates. The downstream outlet from the fracture is closed to allow pressurization, which is measured by an external pressure transducer. A linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) attached to the axial piston measures axial displacement, from which we calculate shear displacement along the fracture. Additionally, P-wave transducers are used to record acoustic signatures, where acoustic emission events and maximum amplitudes are compared against seismic moment and shear slip velocity.
Fluid injection rates range between 0.05 mL/min, 0.25 mL/min, and 0.75 mL/min for each experiment. Along-fault pressure distributions are progressively less uniform as injection rates increase, representing a switch from steady-state to transient conditions. Triggered shear displacement is used as a proxy for seismic moment and is indexed against cumulative injection volume and rate. Each experiment is performed under constant shear stress conditions, and the sample is fully saturated with DI water. Axial and confining stresses are applied to 3 MPa through pressure-stepping in 500 kPa increments. The pore pressure is held constant at 200 kPa prior to initiating the experiment, and initial axial displacement is recorded. The axial stress is then increased to initiate shear mobilization during the loading phase (run-in) until a peak steady state is achieved. The initial shear stress is reduced to approximately 80% of the peak shear stress by decreasing the axial stress, then held constant for the duration of each experiment.
Citation Formats
Pennsylvania State University. (2023). Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment [data set]. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443.
Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, and Wang, Junpeng. Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment . United States: N.p., 07 Nov, 2023. Web. doi: 10.15121/2429443.
Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, & Wang, Junpeng. Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment . United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443
Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, and Wang, Junpeng. 2023. "Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment ". United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1625.
@div{oedi_1625, title = {Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment }, author = {Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, and Wang, Junpeng.}, abstractNote = {Included are experimental data recorded from shear experiments that specifically explore the link between fluid-injection rate and seismic moment resulting from shear reactivation of laboratory faults. Raw mechanical data from three experiments are included alongside corresponding MATLAB scripts that import and plot the data, as well as use it to calculate shear and normal stress.
Experiments are performed on 2.5-3 inch long granitoid cores from the Utah FORGE EGS demonstration site, containing a single inclined fracture with small-scale roughness added to the fracture surface. The raw data included here were recorded from an aluminum triaxial pressure vessel (TEMCO) configured with three independent servo-controlled pumps, with distilled water used as the working fluid. The pumps control confining pressure, upstream pore pressure, and axial pressure, with each pump connected to a LabView interface to record applied pressures, cumulative injected water volumes, and pump flow rates. The downstream outlet from the fracture is closed to allow pressurization, which is measured by an external pressure transducer. A linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) attached to the axial piston measures axial displacement, from which we calculate shear displacement along the fracture. Additionally, P-wave transducers are used to record acoustic signatures, where acoustic emission events and maximum amplitudes are compared against seismic moment and shear slip velocity.
Fluid injection rates range between 0.05 mL/min, 0.25 mL/min, and 0.75 mL/min for each experiment. Along-fault pressure distributions are progressively less uniform as injection rates increase, representing a switch from steady-state to transient conditions. Triggered shear displacement is used as a proxy for seismic moment and is indexed against cumulative injection volume and rate. Each experiment is performed under constant shear stress conditions, and the sample is fully saturated with DI water. Axial and confining stresses are applied to 3 MPa through pressure-stepping in 500 kPa increments. The pore pressure is held constant at 200 kPa prior to initiating the experiment, and initial axial displacement is recorded. The axial stress is then increased to initiate shear mobilization during the loading phase (run-in) until a peak steady state is achieved. The initial shear stress is reduced to approximately 80% of the peak shear stress by decreasing the axial stress, then held constant for the duration of each experiment.}, doi = {10.15121/2429443}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1625}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2023}, month = {11}}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443
Details
Data from Nov 7, 2023
Last updated Aug 14, 2024
Submitted Aug 12, 2024
Organization
Pennsylvania State University
Contact
Matthew Roseboom
610.790.7402
Authors
Keywords
geothermal, energy, induced seismicity, injection rate, EGS, seismic moment, geomechanics, geophysics, Utah FORGE, shear, MATLAB, shear experiments, raw data, code, core experiment, TEMCO, confining pressure, pore pressure, axial pressure, shear displacement, fracture, along-fault pressure, constant shear stressDOE Project Details
Project Name Utah FORGE
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0007080