Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment

Publicly accessible License 

Included are experimental data recorded from shear experiments that specifically explore the link between fluid-injection rate and seismic moment resulting from shear reactivation of laboratory faults. Raw mechanical data from three experiments are included alongside corresponding MATLAB scripts that import and plot the data, as well as use it to calculate shear and normal stress.

Experiments are performed on 2.5-3 inch long granitoid cores from the Utah FORGE EGS demonstration site, containing a single inclined fracture with small-scale roughness added to the fracture surface. The raw data included here were recorded from an aluminum triaxial pressure vessel (TEMCO) configured with three independent servo-controlled pumps, with distilled water used as the working fluid. The pumps control confining pressure, upstream pore pressure, and axial pressure, with each pump connected to a LabView interface to record applied pressures, cumulative injected water volumes, and pump flow rates. The downstream outlet from the fracture is closed to allow pressurization, which is measured by an external pressure transducer. A linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) attached to the axial piston measures axial displacement, from which we calculate shear displacement along the fracture. Additionally, P-wave transducers are used to record acoustic signatures, where acoustic emission events and maximum amplitudes are compared against seismic moment and shear slip velocity.

Fluid injection rates range between 0.05 mL/min, 0.25 mL/min, and 0.75 mL/min for each experiment. Along-fault pressure distributions are progressively less uniform as injection rates increase, representing a switch from steady-state to transient conditions. Triggered shear displacement is used as a proxy for seismic moment and is indexed against cumulative injection volume and rate. Each experiment is performed under constant shear stress conditions, and the sample is fully saturated with DI water. Axial and confining stresses are applied to 3 MPa through pressure-stepping in 500 kPa increments. The pore pressure is held constant at 200 kPa prior to initiating the experiment, and initial axial displacement is recorded. The axial stress is then increased to initiate shear mobilization during the loading phase (run-in) until a peak steady state is achieved. The initial shear stress is reduced to approximately 80% of the peak shear stress by decreasing the axial stress, then held constant for the duration of each experiment.

Citation Formats

Pennsylvania State University. (2023). Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment [data set]. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443.
Export Citation to RIS
Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, and Wang, Junpeng. Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment . United States: N.p., 07 Nov, 2023. Web. doi: 10.15121/2429443.
Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, & Wang, Junpeng. Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment . United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443
Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, and Wang, Junpeng. 2023. "Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment ". United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1625.
@div{oedi_1625, title = {Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment }, author = {Roseboom, Matthew, Elsworth, Derek, Eijsink, Agathe, Yu, Jiayi, Marone, Chris, Shokouhi, Parisa, Riviere, Jacques, and Wang, Junpeng.}, abstractNote = {Included are experimental data recorded from shear experiments that specifically explore the link between fluid-injection rate and seismic moment resulting from shear reactivation of laboratory faults. Raw mechanical data from three experiments are included alongside corresponding MATLAB scripts that import and plot the data, as well as use it to calculate shear and normal stress.

Experiments are performed on 2.5-3 inch long granitoid cores from the Utah FORGE EGS demonstration site, containing a single inclined fracture with small-scale roughness added to the fracture surface. The raw data included here were recorded from an aluminum triaxial pressure vessel (TEMCO) configured with three independent servo-controlled pumps, with distilled water used as the working fluid. The pumps control confining pressure, upstream pore pressure, and axial pressure, with each pump connected to a LabView interface to record applied pressures, cumulative injected water volumes, and pump flow rates. The downstream outlet from the fracture is closed to allow pressurization, which is measured by an external pressure transducer. A linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) attached to the axial piston measures axial displacement, from which we calculate shear displacement along the fracture. Additionally, P-wave transducers are used to record acoustic signatures, where acoustic emission events and maximum amplitudes are compared against seismic moment and shear slip velocity.

Fluid injection rates range between 0.05 mL/min, 0.25 mL/min, and 0.75 mL/min for each experiment. Along-fault pressure distributions are progressively less uniform as injection rates increase, representing a switch from steady-state to transient conditions. Triggered shear displacement is used as a proxy for seismic moment and is indexed against cumulative injection volume and rate. Each experiment is performed under constant shear stress conditions, and the sample is fully saturated with DI water. Axial and confining stresses are applied to 3 MPa through pressure-stepping in 500 kPa increments. The pore pressure is held constant at 200 kPa prior to initiating the experiment, and initial axial displacement is recorded. The axial stress is then increased to initiate shear mobilization during the loading phase (run-in) until a peak steady state is achieved. The initial shear stress is reduced to approximately 80% of the peak shear stress by decreasing the axial stress, then held constant for the duration of each experiment.}, doi = {10.15121/2429443}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1625}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2023}, month = {11}}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/2429443

Details

Data from Nov 7, 2023

Last updated Aug 14, 2024

Submitted Aug 12, 2024

Organization

Pennsylvania State University

Contact

Matthew Roseboom

610.790.7402

Authors

Matthew Roseboom

Pennsylvania State University

Derek Elsworth

Pennsylvania State University

Agathe Eijsink

Pennsylvania State University

Jiayi Yu

Pennsylvania State University

Chris Marone

Pennsylvania State University

Parisa Shokouhi

Pennsylvania State University

Jacques Riviere

Pennsylvania State University

Junpeng Wang

Pennsylvania State University

DOE Project Details

Project Name Utah FORGE

Project Lead Lauren Boyd

Project Number EE0007080

Share

Submission Downloads