Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings

Publicly accessible License 

Structural controls of 426 geothermal systems in the Great Basin region including western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern Nevada, northeastern Nevada, east-central Nevada, eastern California, southern Oregon, and western Utah were analyzed with literature research, air photos, Google Earth imagery, and/or field reviews. Of the systems analyzed, we were able to determine the structural settings of more than 240 sites. The structural catalogue is stored in a master spreadsheet included in this submission. Data components include structural setting, primary fault orientation, presence or absence of Quaternary faulting, reservoir lithology, geothermometry, presence or absence of recent magmatism, and distinguishing blind systems from those that have surface expressions.

Systems were cataloged into the following eight major groups, based on the dominant pattern of faulting:
- Major normal fault segments (i.e., near displacement maxima).
- Fault bends.
- Fault terminations or tips.
- Step-overs or relay ramps in normal faults.
- Fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones (i.e., belts of intermeshing oppositely dipping normal faults),
- Displacement transfer zones whereby strike-slip faults terminate in arrays of normal faults.
- Transtensional pull-aparts.

These settings form a hierarchal pattern with respect to fault complexity.
- Major normal faults and fault bends are the simplest.
- Fault terminations are typically more complex than mid-segments, as faults commonly break up into multiple strands or horsetail near their ends.
- A fault intersection is generally more complex, as it generally contains both multiple fault strands and can include discrete dilational quadrants.
- A step-over consists of two overlapping fault terminations and thus involves additional complexity, especially where the relay ramp is breached by multiple fault splays between the main overlapping faults and thus contains multiple fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones involve further complexity, as they contain multiple fault terminations and fault intersections.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - Structural controls of 426 geothermal systems in the Great Basin region including western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern Nevada, northeastern Nevada, east-central Nevada, eastern California, southern Oregon, and western Utah were analyzed with literature research, air photos, Google Earth imagery, and/or field reviews. Of the systems analyzed, we were able to determine the structural settings of more than 240 sites. The structural catalogue is stored in a master spreadsheet included in this submission. Data components include structural setting, primary fault orientation, presence or absence of Quaternary faulting, reservoir lithology, geothermometry, presence or absence of recent magmatism, and distinguishing blind systems from those that have surface expressions. Systems were cataloged into the following eight major groups, based on the dominant pattern of faulting: - Major normal fault segments (i.e., near displacement maxima). - Fault bends. - Fault terminations or tips. - Step-overs or relay ramps in normal faults. - Fault intersections. - Accommodation zones (i.e., belts of intermeshing oppositely dipping normal faults), - Displacement transfer zones whereby strike-slip faults terminate in arrays of normal faults. - Transtensional pull-aparts. These settings form a hierarchal pattern with respect to fault complexity. - Major normal faults and fault bends are the simplest. - Fault terminations are typically more complex than mid-segments, as faults commonly break up into multiple strands or horsetail near their ends. - A fault intersection is generally more complex, as it generally contains both multiple fault strands and can include discrete dilational quadrants. - A step-over consists of two overlapping fault terminations and thus involves additional complexity, especially where the relay ramp is breached by multiple fault splays between the main overlapping faults and thus contains multiple fault intersections. - Accommodation zones involve further complexity, as they contain multiple fault terminations and fault intersections. AU - Faulds, James E. DB - Geothermal Data Repository DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory DO - 10.15121/1148722 KW - geothermal KW - Quaternary Faults KW - Structural Controls KW - Blind Geothermal Systems KW - Temperature KW - Geothermometry KW - field visits KW - western Nevada KW - central Nevada KW - northwestern nevada KW - northeastern nevada KW - east-central nevada KW - eastern california KW - southern oregon KW - western utah KW - utah KW - nevada KW - oregon KW - california KW - baltazor hot spring KW - blue mountain KW - bog hot spring KW - dyke hot springs KW - howard hot spring KW - macFarlane hot spring KW - McGee Mountain KW - pinto hot springs KW - beowawe KW - crescent valley KW - hot springs point KW - dann ranch KW - hand-me-down hot springs KW - golconda KW - pumpernickel valley KW - tipton hot springs KW - ash springs KW - chimney hot spring KW - duckwater KW - hiko hot spring KW - iverson spring KW - moon river hot spring KW - moorman spring KW - railroad valley KW - williams hot spring KW - walleys hot spring KW - antelope valley KW - fales hot springs KW - buckeye hot springs KW - travertine hot springs KW - teels marsh KW - rhodes marsh KW - columbus marsh KW - alum-silver peak KW - fish lake valley KW - gabbs valley KW - wild rose KW - rawhide-wedell hot springs KW - alkali hot springs KW - baileys/hicks/burrell hot springs KW - alvord hot spring KW - baileys hot spring KW - burrell hot spring KW - hicks hot spring KW - antelope hot spring KW - hart mountain KW - borax lake KW - crump geyser KW - mickey hot spring KW - newcastle KW - veyo hot spring KW - dixie hot spring KW - thermo KW - roosevelt KW - cove fort KW - red hill hot spring KW - joseph hot spring KW - hatton hot spring KW - abraham-baker hot springs KW - great basin KW - hot creek butte LA - English DA - 2013/12/31 PY - 2013 PB - University of Nevada T1 - Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Faulds, James E.. Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings. University of Nevada, 31 December, 2013, Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722.
Faulds, J. (2013). Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings. [Data set]. Geothermal Data Repository. University of Nevada. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722
Faulds, James E.. Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings. University of Nevada, December, 31, 2013. Distributed by Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722
@misc{GDR_Dataset_355, title = {Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings}, author = {Faulds, James E.}, abstractNote = {Structural controls of 426 geothermal systems in the Great Basin region including western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern Nevada, northeastern Nevada, east-central Nevada, eastern California, southern Oregon, and western Utah were analyzed with literature research, air photos, Google Earth imagery, and/or field reviews. Of the systems analyzed, we were able to determine the structural settings of more than 240 sites. The structural catalogue is stored in a master spreadsheet included in this submission. Data components include structural setting, primary fault orientation, presence or absence of Quaternary faulting, reservoir lithology, geothermometry, presence or absence of recent magmatism, and distinguishing blind systems from those that have surface expressions.

Systems were cataloged into the following eight major groups, based on the dominant pattern of faulting:
- Major normal fault segments (i.e., near displacement maxima).
- Fault bends.
- Fault terminations or tips.
- Step-overs or relay ramps in normal faults.
- Fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones (i.e., belts of intermeshing oppositely dipping normal faults),
- Displacement transfer zones whereby strike-slip faults terminate in arrays of normal faults.
- Transtensional pull-aparts.

These settings form a hierarchal pattern with respect to fault complexity.
- Major normal faults and fault bends are the simplest.
- Fault terminations are typically more complex than mid-segments, as faults commonly break up into multiple strands or horsetail near their ends.
- A fault intersection is generally more complex, as it generally contains both multiple fault strands and can include discrete dilational quadrants.
- A step-over consists of two overlapping fault terminations and thus involves additional complexity, especially where the relay ramp is breached by multiple fault splays between the main overlapping faults and thus contains multiple fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones involve further complexity, as they contain multiple fault terminations and fault intersections.
}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/355}, year = {2013}, howpublished = {Geothermal Data Repository, University of Nevada, https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722}, note = {Accessed: 2025-05-11}, doi = {10.15121/1148722} }
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1148722

Details

Data from Dec 31, 2013

Last updated Jul 26, 2022

Submitted Mar 20, 2014

Organization

University of Nevada

Contact

James E. Faulds

775.682.8751

Authors

James E. Faulds

University of Nevada

DOE Project Details

Project Name Recovery Act: Characterizing Structural Controls of EGS-Candidate and Conventional Geothermal Reservoirs in the Great Basin: Developing Successful Exploration Strategies in Extended Terranes

Project Lead Mark Ziegenbein

Project Number EE0002748

Share

Submission Downloads