Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings
Structural controls of 426 geothermal systems in the Great Basin region including western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern Nevada, northeastern Nevada, east-central Nevada, eastern California, southern Oregon, and western Utah were analyzed with literature research, air photos, Google Earth imagery, and/or field reviews. Of the systems analyzed, we were able to determine the structural settings of more than 240 sites. The structural catalogue is stored in a master spreadsheet included in this submission. Data components include structural setting, primary fault orientation, presence or absence of Quaternary faulting, reservoir lithology, geothermometry, presence or absence of recent magmatism, and distinguishing blind systems from those that have surface expressions.
Systems were cataloged into the following eight major groups, based on the dominant pattern of faulting:
- Major normal fault segments (i.e., near displacement maxima).
- Fault bends.
- Fault terminations or tips.
- Step-overs or relay ramps in normal faults.
- Fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones (i.e., belts of intermeshing oppositely dipping normal faults),
- Displacement transfer zones whereby strike-slip faults terminate in arrays of normal faults.
- Transtensional pull-aparts.
These settings form a hierarchal pattern with respect to fault complexity.
- Major normal faults and fault bends are the simplest.
- Fault terminations are typically more complex than mid-segments, as faults commonly break up into multiple strands or horsetail near their ends.
- A fault intersection is generally more complex, as it generally contains both multiple fault strands and can include discrete dilational quadrants.
- A step-over consists of two overlapping fault terminations and thus involves additional complexity, especially where the relay ramp is breached by multiple fault splays between the main overlapping faults and thus contains multiple fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones involve further complexity, as they contain multiple fault terminations and fault intersections.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - Structural controls of 426 geothermal systems in the Great Basin region including western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern Nevada, northeastern Nevada, east-central Nevada, eastern California, southern Oregon, and western Utah were analyzed with literature research, air photos, Google Earth imagery, and/or field reviews. Of the systems analyzed, we were able to determine the structural settings of more than 240 sites. The structural catalogue is stored in a master spreadsheet included in this submission. Data components include structural setting, primary fault orientation, presence or absence of Quaternary faulting, reservoir lithology, geothermometry, presence or absence of recent magmatism, and distinguishing blind systems from those that have surface expressions.
Systems were cataloged into the following eight major groups, based on the dominant pattern of faulting:
- Major normal fault segments (i.e., near displacement maxima).
- Fault bends.
- Fault terminations or tips.
- Step-overs or relay ramps in normal faults.
- Fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones (i.e., belts of intermeshing oppositely dipping normal faults),
- Displacement transfer zones whereby strike-slip faults terminate in arrays of normal faults.
- Transtensional pull-aparts.
These settings form a hierarchal pattern with respect to fault complexity.
- Major normal faults and fault bends are the simplest.
- Fault terminations are typically more complex than mid-segments, as faults commonly break up into multiple strands or horsetail near their ends.
- A fault intersection is generally more complex, as it generally contains both multiple fault strands and can include discrete dilational quadrants.
- A step-over consists of two overlapping fault terminations and thus involves additional complexity, especially where the relay ramp is breached by multiple fault splays between the main overlapping faults and thus contains multiple fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones involve further complexity, as they contain multiple fault terminations and fault intersections.
AU - Faulds, James E.
DB - Geothermal Data Repository
DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory
DO - 10.15121/1148722
KW - geothermal
KW - Quaternary Faults
KW - Structural Controls
KW - Blind Geothermal Systems
KW - Temperature
KW - Geothermometry
KW - field visits
KW - western Nevada
KW - central Nevada
KW - northwestern nevada
KW - northeastern nevada
KW - east-central nevada
KW - eastern california
KW - southern oregon
KW - western utah
KW - utah
KW - nevada
KW - oregon
KW - california
KW - baltazor hot spring
KW - blue mountain
KW - bog hot spring
KW - dyke hot springs
KW - howard hot spring
KW - macFarlane hot spring
KW - McGee Mountain
KW - pinto hot springs
KW - beowawe
KW - crescent valley
KW - hot springs point
KW - dann ranch
KW - hand-me-down hot springs
KW - golconda
KW - pumpernickel valley
KW - tipton hot springs
KW - ash springs
KW - chimney hot spring
KW - duckwater
KW - hiko hot spring
KW - iverson spring
KW - moon river hot spring
KW - moorman spring
KW - railroad valley
KW - williams hot spring
KW - walleys hot spring
KW - antelope valley
KW - fales hot springs
KW - buckeye hot springs
KW - travertine hot springs
KW - teels marsh
KW - rhodes marsh
KW - columbus marsh
KW - alum-silver peak
KW - fish lake valley
KW - gabbs valley
KW - wild rose
KW - rawhide-wedell hot springs
KW - alkali hot springs
KW - baileys/hicks/burrell hot springs
KW - alvord hot spring
KW - baileys hot spring
KW - burrell hot spring
KW - hicks hot spring
KW - antelope hot spring
KW - hart mountain
KW - borax lake
KW - crump geyser
KW - mickey hot spring
KW - newcastle
KW - veyo hot spring
KW - dixie hot spring
KW - thermo
KW - roosevelt
KW - cove fort
KW - red hill hot spring
KW - joseph hot spring
KW - hatton hot spring
KW - abraham-baker hot springs
KW - great basin
KW - hot creek butte
LA - English
DA - 2013/12/31
PY - 2013
PB - University of Nevada
T1 - Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings
UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722
ER -
Faulds, James E.. Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings. University of Nevada, 31 December, 2013, Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722.
Faulds, J. (2013). Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings. [Data set]. Geothermal Data Repository. University of Nevada. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722
Faulds, James E.. Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings. University of Nevada, December, 31, 2013. Distributed by Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722
@misc{GDR_Dataset_355,
title = {Structural Inventory of Great Basin Geothermal Systems and Definition of Favorable Structural Settings},
author = {Faulds, James E.},
abstractNote = {Structural controls of 426 geothermal systems in the Great Basin region including western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern Nevada, northeastern Nevada, east-central Nevada, eastern California, southern Oregon, and western Utah were analyzed with literature research, air photos, Google Earth imagery, and/or field reviews. Of the systems analyzed, we were able to determine the structural settings of more than 240 sites. The structural catalogue is stored in a master spreadsheet included in this submission. Data components include structural setting, primary fault orientation, presence or absence of Quaternary faulting, reservoir lithology, geothermometry, presence or absence of recent magmatism, and distinguishing blind systems from those that have surface expressions.
Systems were cataloged into the following eight major groups, based on the dominant pattern of faulting:
- Major normal fault segments (i.e., near displacement maxima).
- Fault bends.
- Fault terminations or tips.
- Step-overs or relay ramps in normal faults.
- Fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones (i.e., belts of intermeshing oppositely dipping normal faults),
- Displacement transfer zones whereby strike-slip faults terminate in arrays of normal faults.
- Transtensional pull-aparts.
These settings form a hierarchal pattern with respect to fault complexity.
- Major normal faults and fault bends are the simplest.
- Fault terminations are typically more complex than mid-segments, as faults commonly break up into multiple strands or horsetail near their ends.
- A fault intersection is generally more complex, as it generally contains both multiple fault strands and can include discrete dilational quadrants.
- A step-over consists of two overlapping fault terminations and thus involves additional complexity, especially where the relay ramp is breached by multiple fault splays between the main overlapping faults and thus contains multiple fault intersections.
- Accommodation zones involve further complexity, as they contain multiple fault terminations and fault intersections.
},
url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/355},
year = {2013},
howpublished = {Geothermal Data Repository, University of Nevada, https://doi.org/10.15121/1148722},
note = {Accessed: 2025-05-11},
doi = {10.15121/1148722}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1148722
Details
Data from Dec 31, 2013
Last updated Jul 26, 2022
Submitted Mar 20, 2014
Organization
University of Nevada
Contact
James E. Faulds
775.682.8751
Authors
Keywords
geothermal, Quaternary Faults, Structural Controls, Blind Geothermal Systems, Temperature, Geothermometry, field visits, western Nevada, central Nevada, northwestern nevada, northeastern nevada, east-central nevada, eastern california, southern oregon, western utah, utah, nevada, oregon, california, baltazor hot spring, blue mountain, bog hot spring, dyke hot springs, howard hot spring, macFarlane hot spring, McGee Mountain, pinto hot springs, beowawe, crescent valley, hot springs point, dann ranch, hand-me-down hot springs, golconda, pumpernickel valley, tipton hot springs, ash springs, chimney hot spring, duckwater, hiko hot spring, iverson spring, moon river hot spring, moorman spring, railroad valley, williams hot spring, walleys hot spring, antelope valley, fales hot springs, buckeye hot springs, travertine hot springs, teels marsh, rhodes marsh, columbus marsh, alum-silver peak, fish lake valley, gabbs valley, wild rose, rawhide-wedell hot springs, alkali hot springs, baileys/hicks/burrell hot springs, alvord hot spring, baileys hot spring, burrell hot spring, hicks hot spring, antelope hot spring, hart mountain, borax lake, crump geyser, mickey hot spring, newcastle, veyo hot spring, dixie hot spring, thermo, roosevelt, cove fort, red hill hot spring, joseph hot spring, hatton hot spring, abraham-baker hot springs, great basin, hot creek butteDOE Project Details
Project Name Recovery Act: Characterizing Structural Controls of EGS-Candidate and Conventional Geothermal Reservoirs in the Great Basin: Developing Successful Exploration Strategies in Extended Terranes
Project Lead Mark Ziegenbein
Project Number EE0002748