Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies

Publicly accessible License 

According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), geothermal energy generation in the United States is projected to more than triple by 2040 (EIA 2013). This addition, which translates to more than 5 GW of generation capacity, is anticipated because of technological advances and an increase in available sources through the continued development of enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs) and low-temperature resources (EIA 2013). Studies have shown that air emissions, water consumption, and land use for geothermal electricity generation have less of an impact than traditional fossil fuel-based electricity generation; however, the long-term sustainability of geothermal power plants can be affected by insufficient replacement of aboveground or belowground operational fluid losses resulting from normal operations (Schroeder et al. 2014). Thus, access to water is therefore critical for increased deployment of EGS technologies and, therefore, growth of the geothermal sector. This paper examines water issues relating to EGS development from a variety of perspectives. It starts by exploring the relationship between EGS site geology, stimulation protocols, and below ground water loss, which is one of the largest drivers of water consumption for EGS projects. It then examines the relative costs of different potential traditional and alternative water sources for EGS. Finally it summarizes specific state policies relevant to the use of alternative water sources for EGS, and finally explores the relationship between EGS site geology, stimulation protocols, and below ground water loss, which is one of the largest drivers of water consumption for EGS projects.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), geothermal energy generation in the United States is projected to more than triple by 2040 (EIA 2013). This addition, which translates to more than 5 GW of generation capacity, is anticipated because of technological advances and an increase in available sources through the continued development of enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs) and low-temperature resources (EIA 2013). Studies have shown that air emissions, water consumption, and land use for geothermal electricity generation have less of an impact than traditional fossil fuel-based electricity generation; however, the long-term sustainability of geothermal power plants can be affected by insufficient replacement of aboveground or belowground operational fluid losses resulting from normal operations (Schroeder et al. 2014). Thus, access to water is therefore critical for increased deployment of EGS technologies and, therefore, growth of the geothermal sector. This paper examines water issues relating to EGS development from a variety of perspectives. It starts by exploring the relationship between EGS site geology, stimulation protocols, and below ground water loss, which is one of the largest drivers of water consumption for EGS projects. It then examines the relative costs of different potential traditional and alternative water sources for EGS. Finally it summarizes specific state policies relevant to the use of alternative water sources for EGS, and finally explores the relationship between EGS site geology, stimulation protocols, and below ground water loss, which is one of the largest drivers of water consumption for EGS projects. AU - Harto, C. B. A2 - Schroeder, J. N. A3 - Horner, R. M. A4 - Patton, T. L. A5 - Durham, L. A. A6 - Murphy, D. J. A7 - Clark, C. E. DB - Geothermal Data Repository DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory DO - 10.15121/1170247 KW - geothermal KW - EGS KW - enhance geothermal system KW - power KW - geology KW - alternative water KW - policy KW - water KW - water use KW - desert peak KW - the geysers KW - newberry KW - newberry volcano KW - raft river LA - English DA - 2014/12/16 PY - 2014 PB - Argonne National Laboratory T1 - Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1170247 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Harto, C. B., et al. Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies. Argonne National Laboratory, 16 December, 2014, Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1170247.
Harto, C., Schroeder, J., Horner, R., Patton, T., Durham, L., Murphy, D., & Clark, C. (2014). Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies. [Data set]. Geothermal Data Repository. Argonne National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.15121/1170247
Harto, C. B., J. N. Schroeder, R. M. Horner, T. L. Patton, L. A. Durham, D. J. Murphy, and C. E. Clark. Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies. Argonne National Laboratory, December, 16, 2014. Distributed by Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1170247
@misc{GDR_Dataset_464, title = {Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies}, author = {Harto, C. B. and Schroeder, J. N. and Horner, R. M. and Patton, T. L. and Durham, L. A. and Murphy, D. J. and Clark, C. E.}, abstractNote = {According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), geothermal energy generation in the United States is projected to more than triple by 2040 (EIA 2013). This addition, which translates to more than 5 GW of generation capacity, is anticipated because of technological advances and an increase in available sources through the continued development of enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs) and low-temperature resources (EIA 2013). Studies have shown that air emissions, water consumption, and land use for geothermal electricity generation have less of an impact than traditional fossil fuel-based electricity generation; however, the long-term sustainability of geothermal power plants can be affected by insufficient replacement of aboveground or belowground operational fluid losses resulting from normal operations (Schroeder et al. 2014). Thus, access to water is therefore critical for increased deployment of EGS technologies and, therefore, growth of the geothermal sector. This paper examines water issues relating to EGS development from a variety of perspectives. It starts by exploring the relationship between EGS site geology, stimulation protocols, and below ground water loss, which is one of the largest drivers of water consumption for EGS projects. It then examines the relative costs of different potential traditional and alternative water sources for EGS. Finally it summarizes specific state policies relevant to the use of alternative water sources for EGS, and finally explores the relationship between EGS site geology, stimulation protocols, and below ground water loss, which is one of the largest drivers of water consumption for EGS projects. }, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/464}, year = {2014}, howpublished = {Geothermal Data Repository, Argonne National Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.15121/1170247}, note = {Accessed: 2025-05-07}, doi = {10.15121/1170247} }
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1170247

Details

Data from Dec 16, 2014

Last updated Jun 27, 2017

Submitted Dec 16, 2014

Organization

Argonne National Laboratory

Contact

Jenna N. Schroeder

202.488.2420

Authors

C. B. Harto

Argonne National Laboratory

J. N. Schroeder

Argonne National Laboratory

R. M. Horner

Argonne National Laboratory

T. L. Patton

Argonne National Laboratory

L. A. Durham

Argonne National Laboratory

D. J. Murphy

Argonne National Laboratory

C. E. Clark

Argonne National Laboratory

DOE Project Details

Project Name Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation Projects, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Use Policies

Project Lead Arlene Anderson

Project Number FY14 AOP 4.1.0.1

Share

Submission Downloads