Newberry Caldera Conceptual Geophysical Model
Conceptual model for the Newberry Caldera geothermal area. Model is centered around caldera and evaluates multiple geophysical datasets to derive a conceptual subsurface model.
Includes:
Conductor layer based on transient electromagnetic data from Fitterman et al., 1988 (figure 10)
Base of conductor layer based on MT conductor values found in Waibel et al., 2014 (DOE document, figure 38)
Resistor layer based on magnetotellurics from Fitterman et al., 1988 (figure 13).
Seismic intrusives layer representing a smoothed version of 5.5 km/s seismic velocity layer defined in Beachly et al., 2012
West flank seismic body representing a fractional change in seismic velocity of 0.1, defined in Beachly et al., 2012 and Heath et al., 2015
West flank gravity body "granite" that represents a gravity anomaly identified in Waibel et al., 2014 (DOE document, figure 35)
Magma chamber defined seismically, found in Heath et al., 2015
Ring fracture fault intrusions
Various faults and geologic layers
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - Conceptual model for the Newberry Caldera geothermal area. Model is centered around caldera and evaluates multiple geophysical datasets to derive a conceptual subsurface model.
Includes:
Conductor layer based on transient electromagnetic data from Fitterman et al., 1988 (figure 10)
Base of conductor layer based on MT conductor values found in Waibel et al., 2014 (DOE document, figure 38)
Resistor layer based on magnetotellurics from Fitterman et al., 1988 (figure 13).
Seismic intrusives layer representing a smoothed version of 5.5 km/s seismic velocity layer defined in Beachly et al., 2012
West flank seismic body representing a fractional change in seismic velocity of 0.1, defined in Beachly et al., 2012 and Heath et al., 2015
West flank gravity body "granite" that represents a gravity anomaly identified in Waibel et al., 2014 (DOE document, figure 35)
Magma chamber defined seismically, found in Heath et al., 2015
Ring fracture fault intrusions
Various faults and geologic layers
AU - Moser, Mark M.
A2 - Schultz, J.
A3 - Schultz, A.
A4 - Heath, B.
A5 - Rose, Kelly
A6 - Urquhart, S.
A7 - Bowles-Martinez, E.
A8 - Vincent, P.
DB - Geothermal Data Repository
DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory
DO -
KW - geothermal
KW - enhanced geothermal system
KW - EGS
KW - NEWGEN
KW - Newberry
KW - Oregon
KW - gravity
KW - seismic
KW - conceptual model
KW - subsurface model
KW - geologic model
KW - structure
KW - geophysics
KW - faults
KW - MT
KW - magnetotelluric
KW - model
KW - conceptual
KW - geophysical
KW - caldera
LA - English
DA - 2016/03/04
PY - 2016
PB - National Energy Technology Laboratory
T1 - Newberry Caldera Conceptual Geophysical Model
UR - https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/752
ER -
Moser, Mark M., et al. Newberry Caldera Conceptual Geophysical Model. National Energy Technology Laboratory, 4 March, 2016, Geothermal Data Repository. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/752.
Moser, M., Schultz, J., Schultz, A., Heath, B., Rose, K., Urquhart, S., Bowles-Martinez, E., & Vincent, P. (2016). Newberry Caldera Conceptual Geophysical Model. [Data set]. Geothermal Data Repository. National Energy Technology Laboratory. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/752
Moser, Mark M., J. Schultz, A. Schultz, B. Heath, Kelly Rose, S. Urquhart, E. Bowles-Martinez, and P. Vincent. Newberry Caldera Conceptual Geophysical Model. National Energy Technology Laboratory, March, 4, 2016. Distributed by Geothermal Data Repository. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/752
@misc{GDR_Dataset_752,
title = {Newberry Caldera Conceptual Geophysical Model},
author = {Moser, Mark M. and Schultz, J. and Schultz, A. and Heath, B. and Rose, Kelly and Urquhart, S. and Bowles-Martinez, E. and Vincent, P.},
abstractNote = {Conceptual model for the Newberry Caldera geothermal area. Model is centered around caldera and evaluates multiple geophysical datasets to derive a conceptual subsurface model.
Includes:
Conductor layer based on transient electromagnetic data from Fitterman et al., 1988 (figure 10)
Base of conductor layer based on MT conductor values found in Waibel et al., 2014 (DOE document, figure 38)
Resistor layer based on magnetotellurics from Fitterman et al., 1988 (figure 13).
Seismic intrusives layer representing a smoothed version of 5.5 km/s seismic velocity layer defined in Beachly et al., 2012
West flank seismic body representing a fractional change in seismic velocity of 0.1, defined in Beachly et al., 2012 and Heath et al., 2015
West flank gravity body "granite" that represents a gravity anomaly identified in Waibel et al., 2014 (DOE document, figure 35)
Magma chamber defined seismically, found in Heath et al., 2015
Ring fracture fault intrusions
Various faults and geologic layers },
url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/752},
year = {2016},
howpublished = {Geothermal Data Repository, National Energy Technology Laboratory, https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/752},
note = {Accessed: 2025-05-11}
}
Details
Data from Mar 4, 2016
Last updated Nov 14, 2019
Submitted Apr 1, 2016
Organization
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Contact
Kelly Rose
Authors
Keywords
geothermal, enhanced geothermal system, EGS, NEWGEN, Newberry, Oregon, gravity, seismic, conceptual model, subsurface model, geologic model, structure, geophysics, faults, MT, magnetotelluric, model, conceptual, geophysical, calderaDOE Project Details
Project Name Novel use of 4D Monitoring Techniques to Improve Reservoir Longevity and Productivity in Enhanced Geothermal Systems
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number FY11 AOP 11113