OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 276 - 300 of 371.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters Clear All Filters ×
Topic
Technologies
Demonstration Sites
Data Type
"carbonate geothermal system"×
Utah FORGE, UT×

Utah FORGE 6-3629: Application of Machine Learning, Geomechanics, and Seismology for Real-Time Decision Making Tools During Stimulation 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 15, 2024
41.44 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Cutting Edge Application of Machine Learning, Geomechanics, and Seismology for Real-Time Decision Making Tools During Stimulation by the University of Utah, presented by No'am Zach Dvory. This video slide presentation, by the University of Utah, disc...
Authors
Dvory, N. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeuniversity of utahseismicaimachine learningdata-driven decisionscommunity safteyinfrastructure protectionproactive risk mitigationimproved safteyimmediate responsestimulationfracingground motionseismic hazardsegsvideopresentationdecision support

Utah FORGE 4-2492: Design and Implementation of Innovative Stimulation Treatments to Maximize Energy Recovery 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 16, 2024
113.88 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Design and Implementation of Innovative Stimulation Treatments to Maximize Energy Recovery Efficiency by The University of Texas at Austin, presented by Mukul M. Sharma. This video slide presentation discusses the following objectives: (1) to place fr...
Authors
Sharma, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeegswell stimulationfracfracingfractureshorizontal wellfracture networkfracture sizeflowfracture areafracture treatmentsdfnsubsurface modelhydraulic fracturesvideopresentation

Utah FORGE: Stimulation Crosswell Strain Response Fiber Optic Monitoring Report April 2024

Apr 03, 2024
6.43 MB
Publicly accessible
This report documents the use of fiber optic Rayleigh frequency shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS), Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS), and microseismic data recorded during the hydraulic fracture stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, as detected in the offset well 16B(78)-...
Authors
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
geothermalenergystrainmicro seismicdtsdssrfs dsshydraulic fracturingfault reactivationfracture driven interactionfdifrac hitsdistributed temperature sensingdistributed strain sensingprocessed datareportutah forgeneubrexcrosswellfiber optic monitoringgeophysicsstimulation

Utah FORGE: QuantumPro Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation and Circulation Tracer Test Results 2024

Jan 07, 1970
5.38 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes results and supporting documentation from tracer tests conducted in 2024 at Utah FORGE. The tests involved injecting nanoparticle tracers into injection well 16A(78)-32 and monitoring their recovery in production well 16B(78)-32 to assess hydraulic connectivi...
Authors
Guo, Q. et al QuantumPro Inc.
geothermalenergy16b78-3216a78-32tracersquantumproutah forge16a16bstimulationcirculationflotrac nanoparticle tracernanoparticle tracertracer datatracer testegshydraulic connectivitytechnical reportprocessed dataflow contributiontracer recoveryinter-well flow mappingfracture networksampling process

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Connecting In Situ Stress and Wellbore Deviation to Near-Well Fracture Complexity using Phase-Field Simulations

Jan 30, 2025
10.44 MB
Publicly accessible
This report presents a series of numerical experiments investigating the relationships among near-well fracture complexity, in situ stress conditions, and wellbore deviation. Using a phase-field modeling approach, the study explores how factors such as stress regimes, wellbore ori...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgephase fieldnumerical simulationnear wellbore fracture nucleationegsnear-wellfracture complexityin situ stresswellbore deviationphase-field modelingnumerical solutionsfracture nucleationgeos modelingstress regimesfracture propagationrock mechanicstechnical report

Utah FORGE: GeoEnergie Suisse Microseismic Monitoring of 16A and 16B Circulation at Utah FORGE, August-September 2024

Jun 20, 2025
401.21 kB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains microseismic event data collected by Geo-Energie Suisse during circulation testing of wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site in August and September 2024. The data were recorded using a local monitoring network and include key event parameters...
Authors
Dyer, B. et al Geo-Energy Suisse
geothermalenergyutah forgemicroseismicseismicmicroseismic datawell circulation16a-783216b-7832geo-energy suisseegscatalogevent catalogmagnitudepeak ground velocitysnrevent locationgeophysicsseismic clusteringdepthprocessed data

Utah FORGE: Focal Mechanism Catalog from Stage 3 of the April 2022 Stimulation Test

Sep 15, 2025
107.98 kB
Publicly accessible
This submission includes focal-mechanism solutions derived from the Utah FORGE April 2022 Stage-3 stimulation. Waveforms were extracted around each event (short windows bracketing origin times) from the downhole three-component arrays in wells 58-32, 78-32, and 56-32 and the surfa...
Authors
Mohammadi, A. et al Texas A and M University
geothermalenergyforgeutah forgeegsmilfordutahmagnitudestage 3hydraulic stimulationstrikedipkagan anglemoment-tensor inversionmtfitbayesian inversiongeophysicsgeophysical inversionfocal-mechanismsevent catalogdeep-learningamplitude ratios

Utah FORGE: Earthquake Catalog

Mar 21, 2018
66.71 kB
Publicly accessible
This is the set of earthquake catalogs developed for the Utah FORGE project covering December of 2016 through March of 2018. These are discussed in the "Utah FORGE Phase 2B Final Topical Report," which can be found on GDR under id: 1038 (See link 'Final Topical Report' in resource...
Authors
Pankow, K. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forge seismicityseismicityearthquakeearthquakesgeospatial dataearthquake catalogsutah forge earthquake catalogsutahutah forgeutah forge 2broosevelt hot springsmilfordforgephase 2bmicroseismicitymonitoringseismicmicroseismicegsprocessed datareportcatalogresourcecharacterization

Utah FORGE: Geologic, Topographic, and Other Related Maps and GIS Data from the Earth Model

Dec 07, 2018
964.98 MB
Publicly accessible
This submission contains a number of maps and shapefiles related to the Utah FORGE site. Examples include geologic maps (several variations) and GIS data for the Utah FORGE site outline. All data are georeferenced to UTM, zone 12N, NAD 83, NAVD 88.
Authors
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergyforgeearth modelstudent competitiongeospatial dataroosevelt hot springsutahgisarcgisshapefilegeologygeologicmaptopographytopographicegsmilfordutah forgesiteoutlinefaultsquaternarystructural

Utah FORGE: Roosevelt Hot Springs Analytical Well-Based Temperature Model Data

Dec 07, 2018
8.25 kB
Publicly accessible
This submission contains a cumulative record of one-dimensional temperature modeling based off of well data in the vicinity of the Utah FORGE site. Temperature log data from wells used, and in some cases were extrapolated below the bottom of a number of wells. The data were corre...
Authors
Podgorney, R. and Allis, R. Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergytemperature modelstudent competitionforgeutahroosevelt hot springs1dtemperaturemodelmodelingwell-basedegsmilfordutdataearthutah forgemodellingwell datatemperature datacharacterizationgeoreferenced datageospatial dataresourceprocessed data

Utah FORGE: InSAR Data 2019

Jul 01, 2019
478.35 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data used for ground deformation monitoring during Phase 2C of the Utah FORGE project. The dataset includes measurements of the mean rate of range change and associated standard errors, provided in both CSV and...
Authors
Feigl, K. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forge phase 2cutah forgeinsarutahground deformation monitoringdigital elevation modelsynthetic aperture radarsarradarsynthetic aperturesatelliteinterferometricmilfordroosevelt hot springsphase 2cgeodeticsegsimagingremote sensingforgedeformationground deformationprocessed datageospatial data

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Planned Trajectory

Mar 24, 2020
3.58 kB
Publicly accessible
This submission includes an Excel spreadsheet containing the Utah FORGE deep well 16A(78)-32 planned trajectory including UTM coordinates, elevations, and depths from the well head to the toe. This proposed new injection well is expected to descend vertically to a depth of approxi...
Authors
Podgorney, R. and Nash, G. Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergywell 16a78-32utah forgeforgewell 16a78-32 trajectory16a78-32 well planwell datatrajectoryegsgeospatial dataplanneddepthlocationwell location16a78-32injectioninjection test

Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Native State Model 2022 Update

Jul 29, 2022
326.43 MB
Publicly accessible
This is the Phase 3 native state model update. The Phase 3 numerical model represents a significant subsurface volume below the FORGE site footprint. The model domain of 4.0 km x 4.0 km x 4.2 km is located approximately between depths of 4000 to 4200 meters below land surface. Thi...
Authors
Podgorney, R. and Liu, R. Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgenative state modelstresspressuretemperature16a78-3256-3258-3278-3278b-32fracturespore pressurereservoir potentialraw datasimulationmodelinputinput filesprocessed datawater

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation Tracer Test Results

Sep 16, 2022
7.45 MB
Publicly accessible
This archive contains data from the tracer test performed during the Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 stimulation. This includes: the raw data file from Pason in the csv format, a one-page Word document from Pason that explains the headers and units used in their data file, an Excel spr...
Authors
Rose, P. and Barker, B. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forge16a78-3216a78-32 stimulation tracer test16a78-32 tracer test16a78-32 tracertracer testutah forge tracer testsutah forge tracerwell 16a78-32 stimulationstimulationegsforgemass recoveryconcentration chartsconcentration datapasonflowwell datatracer recovery

Utah FORGE: Hydraulic Fracture Width Determination Using Stoneley Wave Pressure Testing and Electrical Borehole Scans

Oct 06, 2023
1 MB
Publicly accessible
This report provides insights into Utah FORGE well 58-32's hydraulic fractures. It utilizes both electrical borehole scans from Schlumberger's Formation Micro-scanner Image tool (FMI) and Stoneley waves from a borehole sonic tool. These methods are combined in a comprehensive work...
Authors
Hornby, B. Hornby Geophysical Services, LLC
geothermalenergyfmistonely wavesformation micro-scanner image toolhydraulic fractureshydraulic fractureelectric borehole scansfracturesutah forgeutah forge well fracturespressure testingutah forge fracture reportborehole sonic toolegsfracture widthreportschlumbergerwave analysisworkflowfracture characterization58-32reservoir characterization

Utah FORGE: Microseismic Event Catalogues from the Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation in April, 2022

Oct 10, 2023
Size unavailable
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes three microseismic event catalogues from the three stages of stimulation in April 2022 of well 16A(78)-32 derived by Geo Energie Suisse. Each spreadsheet contains source times, xy location, depth, and seismic moment magnitude. An animation of the order in whi...
Authors
Karvounis, D. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
geothermalenergymicroseismicmicroseismic eventmicroseismic event catalogmicroseismicityutah forgeutah seismicutah forge microseismic eventgeo energie suissethe international seismological centrewell stimulationwell 16a78-32 stimulationwell 16b78-32 stimulationegsfracing

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Report on Phase Field Modelling of Near-Wellbore Hydraulic Fracture Nucleation and Propagation

Dec 31, 2023
5.37 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a report that describes the modelling of fracture nucleation and propagation in the near-wellbore region to understand the relationship between in situ stress and fracture patterns. A novel phase field formulation is described here, which represents fractures as a diffuse ...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgephase fieldegsmodeltechnical reportfracture nucleationfracture propagationnear-wellborephase field modelnumerical modelgeosfracturingnumerical resultsin situ stress

Utah FORGE: Updated FMI Fracture Log from Well 16A(78)-32

Apr 17, 2024
308.48 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset consists of an Excel spreadsheet detailing the fracture picks from a reinterpretation of the formation micro-imaging (FMI) log from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. The provided information details fracture location, geometry, and type. Also included here is a link to the...
Authors
Handwerger, D. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyfmi logmeasured well depthtrue verticle depthazimuthdip directionfracture typefracture datafractures16a16a78-32utah forgefmiegswell logprocessed data

Utah FORGE 2439: Report on Minifrac Tests for Stress Characterization

Feb 22, 2024
21.49 MB
Publicly accessible
This report describes minifrac tests conducted in the 16B(78)-32 well at the Utah FORGE site to characterize subsurface stresses, including the magnitude and orientation of the minimum and maximum horizontal stresses and the magnitude of the vertical stress. A minifrac test was co...
Authors
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
geothermalenergyutahforgeegsstressgeomechanicsminifracin-situ stress16b16b78-32geophysicshydraulic fracturingvertical stressminimum horizontal stressmaximum horizontal stressstress regimeflowback datare-opening pressurepressure responsethermal coolingrcxcirculationtechnical report

Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Pressure-Temperature Logs March April 2024

Apr 20, 2024
169.22 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset consists of Baker Hughes Pressure-Temperature gauge readings on fiber optics in Utah FORGE Well 16B(78)-32. This gauge is at a measured depth of 7,056.67 feet. The true vertical depth can be determined from the well survey data, which is linked below. The data consis...
Authors
McLennan, J. and Hughes, B. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergywell 16b78-32well 16butah forgebaker pressure temperature logspressure temperaturetemperaturepressurewell 16b78-32 pressure temperature logswell 16b78-32 temperature logswell 16b78-32 pressure logsfiber opticsbaker hughes

Utah FORGE: Direct Shear Test Data for Investigating Seismic Precursors to Shear Failure of Fractures

Jun 11, 2024
3.13 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes results of direct shear tests to investigate the mechanical and geophysical response of dry and saturated fractures in Indiana limestone and Sierra White granite. Direct shear tests were performed on tensile-induced fractures in Indiana limestone and Sierra W...
Authors
Han, K. et al Purdue University
geothermalenergyutah forgesaturationgranitesierra white granitelab testdirect shear testshear strengthshear stressgeophysicsp-waves-waveexcelprocessed dataelastic wave propagationegslaboratory datarmreshearfracturesindiana limestonetransducer

Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Distributed Temperature Sensing Data from April and May 2024

Jul 08, 2024
5.17 GB
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes Neubrex Energy Services fiber optic distributed temperature sensing (DTS) data from well 16B(78)-32 during stimulation and circulation, including interaction with well 16A(78)-32, during April and May 2024. The DTS data are stored in HDF5 file format and are ...
Authors
Jurick, D. and Guzik, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergy16b78-32stimulationfracingcirculation testtemperature datafiberoptic temperatureneubrexutah forgefiber opticfiber optic distributed temperature sensingdistributed temperature sensingdtsegshdf5

Utah FORGE 5-2419: Temperature Testing of Proppants for EGS and Stimulation of Electromagnetic Fracture Mapping Using Electrically-Conducive Proppants 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 14, 2024
43.75 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Temperature Testing of Proppants for EGS and Stimulation of Electromagnetic Fracture Mapping Using Electrically-Conducive Proppants by Stevens Institute of Technology, presented by Cheng Chen. This video slide presentation discusses well controlled la...
Authors
Chen, C. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgestevens institute of technologyproppantselectrically-conductivenon-electrically-conductiveegsfracturesproppant/fracture imagingvideopresentation

Utah FORGE: Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Extended Circulation Test Data August and September 2024

Oct 11, 2024
15.86 MB
Publicly accessible
The dataset includes data collected during an extended circulation test conducted at the Utah FORGE site between August 8 and September 5, 2024. It provides uncorrected, raw digital data from the test, along with calibration information and a final report detailing the test proced...
Authors
McLennan, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgewell 16b78-32well 16a78-3216a16bcirculation testcirculationextended circulationextended circulation testraw dataegsreportpasoncalibration datacalibrationtemperaturepressureflowtest proceduresdata correctionsfield calibration

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Core-Flooding Experiment Results

Apr 04, 2024
5.56 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains core-flood experimental results from the Utah FORGE project, generated through laboratory tests at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The experiments were conducted at temperatures of 100C and 200C using core samples from the 16A(78)-32 well. The primary...
Authors
Smith, M. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergycorefloodutah forgecore testinggeochemistrypermeabilityegscore-flood experimenthydraulic fractureconfining pressureeffluent chemistrybrine chemistrypressure measurementsflowratecore sample16a78-32fluidsphtemperaturefracture evolutionconcentrationprocessed data
<< Previous789101112131415Next >>
Google Map
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR provides free access to data generated from projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Geothermal.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service