OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Instructions for Funds Recipients
    • Data Provision Guidelines
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 26 - 50 of 285.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters Clear All Filters ×
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
"well 16A78-32 stimulation seismic"×
Data×

EGS Collab Experiment 1: SIMFIP Notch-164 GRL Paper

Characterizing the stimulation mode of a fracture is critical to assess the hydraulic efficiency and the seismic risk related to deep fluid manipulations. We have monitored the three-dimensional displacements of a fluid-driven fracture during water injections in a borehole at ~1.5...
Guglielmi, Y. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sep 24, 2020
9 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Logs and Data from Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1)

Data, logs, and graphics associated with the drilling and testing of Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Deep Wells Temperature Surveys as of September 2022

This Excel spreadsheet contains temperature survey results for Utah FORGE wells 58-32, 78-32, 56-32, 16A(78)-32 and 78B-32. It also contains charts and comparisons, along with a "Data Summary" which provides links to previous GDR submissions with temperature data for each well.
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 16, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Schlumberger FMI Logs DLIS and XML files

This zipped data set includes Schlumberger FMI logs DLIS and XML files from Utah FORGE deep well 58-32. These include runs 1 (2226-7550 ft) and 2 (7440-7550 ft). Run 3 (7390-7527ft) was acquired during phase 2C.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 17, 2017
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 78-32 Capacity Test

This dataset includes an Excel spreadsheet with Utah FORGE Phase 2c Well 78-32 capacity data. It also includes a readme file discussing the data which also includes the well coordinates.
Kirby, S. and Gall, R. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jun 20, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Chemical-Based Tool Deployment Data for Inflow Detection at Wells 58-32 and 16B(78)-32 Summer 2024 Circulation Test

This dataset comprises field logging data collected during chemical-based tool deployments at the Utah FORGE geothermal site, specifically at monitoring well 58-32 and production well 16B(78)-32. Data acquisition occurred during the Summer 2024 circulation testing campaign, with t...
Sausan, S. et al Stanford University
Mar 31, 2025
12 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Improved Microseismicity Detection During Newberry EGS Stimulations

Effective enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) require optimal fracture networks for efficient heat transfer between hot rock and fluid. Microseismic mapping is a key tool used to infer the subsurface fracture geometry. Traditional earthquake detection and location techniques are oft...
Templeton, D. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Oct 01, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Sludge XRF

This is an Excel spreadsheet containing the results of X-ray fluorescence from well 56-32 sludge samples. The instrumentation used was a Olympus Vanta M series handheld XRF analyzer. A glass (SiO2) "blank" was analyzed at the beginning and end of each sample batch to detect contam...
Smith, K. Utah Geological Survey
Jul 15, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 5-2615: Well 58-32 and 78-32 Poroelastic Properties

Lab data on permeability, grain bulk modulus, drained bulk modulus, Skempton's pore pressure coefficient, and Biot's effective stress coefficient for Utah Forge Well 58-32 and Well 78-32. Work done as part of project number 5-2615 by the University of Oklahoma.
Ghassemi, A. and Zhou, X. University of Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: In-situ observation of pre-, co and post-seismic shear slip preceding hydraulic fracturing

Understanding the initiation and arrest of earthquakes is one of the long-standing challenges of seismology. Here we report on direct observations of borehole displacement by a meter-sized shear rupture induced by pressurization of metamorphic rock at 1.5 km depth. We observed the...
Guglielmi, Y. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
May 22, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well Data for Student Competition

Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1) was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site. Well Accord-1 was drilled decades ago for geothermal exploration purposes. While ...
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Stress Logging Data

This spreadsheet consist of data and graphs from deep well 58-32 stress testing from 6900 7500 ft depth. Measured stress data were used to correct logging predictions of in situ stress. Stress plots shows pore pressure (measured during the injection testing), the total vertical in...
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 14, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Drilling Data for Student Competition

Diagnostic drilling data (Pason log files) from Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1), which was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site. This dataset includes both ...
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Cuttings X-Ray Diffraction Data

X-ray diffraction (XRD) results from cuttings samples collected during drilling of Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32. The dataset includes XRD data for 77 samples taken between 3,120 and 10,977 feet measured depth (from the Kelly Bushing, 31 feet above ground level), with sampling interv...
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 20, 2025
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Improved Microseismicity Detection During Newberry EGS Stimulations

Effective enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) require optimal fracture networks for efficient heat transfer between hot rock and fluid. Microseismic mapping is a key tool used to infer the subsurface fracture geometry. Traditional earthquake detection and location techniques are oft...
Templeton, D. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Nov 01, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Reinterpretation of Thrubit FMI Log

This dataset contains a reinterpretation of the trip 3, Thrubit FMI log from Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32, covering measured depths from 6,254 to 10,839 feet. Acquired by Schlumberger on May 23, 2023, this version includes newly interpreted tensile drilling-induced fractures, in add...
Wray, A. and Hamilton, D. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 23, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

CO2 Push-Pull Single Fault Injection Simulations

ASCII text files containing grid-block name, X-Y-Z location, and multiple parameters from TOUGH2 simulation output of CO2 injection into an idealized single fault representing a dipping normal fault at the Desert Peak geothermal field (readable by GMS). The fault is composed of a ...
Borgia, A. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sep 21, 2017
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: Continuous Active-Source Seismic Monitoring (CASSM) Data

The U.S. Department of Energy's Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Collab project aims to improve our understanding of hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock for enhanced geothermal energy production through execution of intensely monitored meso-scale experiments. The first expe...
Schoenball, M. and Sprinkle, P. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 25, 2018
6 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 3-2417: Meteorological Data During 2023 Completion/Circulation

This preliminary data archive includes meteorological data recorded at the Utah FORGE facility over the period of time including the completion/cementing of well 16B(78)-32 and the initial 2023 circulation test, largely occurring in June/July/August of 2023. This information may p...
Ajo-Franklin, J. Rice University
Jun 10, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 2: Microseismic Monitoring

This dataset contains continuous seismic waveform data recorded during stimulation and thermal circulation tests for the Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Collab Experiment #2, conducted from February to September 2022 at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Da...
Hopp, C. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
May 28, 2024
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

Life Cycle Water Consumption and Water Resource Assessment for Utility-Scale Geothermal Systems: An In-Depth Analysis of Historical and Forthcoming EGS Projects

This report is the third in a series of reports sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Program in which a range of water-related issues surrounding geothermal power production are evaluated. The first report made an initial attempt at quantifying the li...
Schroeder, J. et al Argonne National Laboratory
Aug 31, 2013
11 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 2: Continuous Active Source Seismic Monitoring (CASSM)

The dataset contains continuous active-source seismic monitoring (CASSM) data collected during EGS Collab Experiment 2, conducted from February to September 2022 at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota. This experiment aimed to investigate enhanced geoth...
Hopp, C. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jan 06, 2025
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

First Tracer Test After Circulation in Desert Peak 27-15

Following the successful stimulation of Desert Peak target EGS well 27-15, a circulation test was initiated by injecting a conservative tracer (1,5-nds) in combination with a reactive tracer (7-amino-1,3-naphthalene disulfonate). The closest production well 74-21 was monitored ove...
Rose, P. University of Utah
Nov 16, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Lab-Scale Stimulation Results on Surrogate Fused Silica Samples

Lab-scale stimulation work on non-porous fused silica (similar mechanical properties to igneous rock) was performed using pure water, pure CO2 and water/CO2 mixtures to compare back to back fracturing performance of these fluids with PNNL's StimuFrac.
Fernandez, C. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jul 06, 2016
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: 3D Seismic Velocity Model and Updated Microseismic Catalog from Double-Difference Seismic Tomography

This package contains a 3D Seismic velocity model and an updated microseismic catalog obtained for a double-difference seismic tomography study. The 3D_seismic_velocity_model text file contains x (m), y(m), z(m), P-wave velocity (km/s), P-wave velocity quality indicator (1 for we...
Chai, C. et al Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jun 01, 2020
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
<< Previous123456Next >>
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR is the submission point for all data collected from research funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Geothermal Technologies Office.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service