Search GDR Data
Showing results 26 - 50 of 268.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Powder X-ray Diffraction Data from Well 16A(78)-32 Core
This dataset from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) consists of four raw X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans and preliminary results of quantitative XRD analysis. The scanned samples were prepared from four subcores, which came from various depths of the FORGE well 16A(78)-3...
Kroll, K. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jul 27, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 1: Second Set Tracer Test Results
The EGS Collab project is developing ~10-20 m-scale field sites where fracture stimulation and flow models can be validated against controlled, small-scale, in-situ experiments. The first multi-well experimental site was established at the 4850 level in the Homestake Mine in Lead,...
Neupane, G. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 19, 2019
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 1a Tensor Strainmeter Data for the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
Data from two Tensor Optical Fiber Strainmeters that were operational during Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the April, 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Each csv file contains data from each stimulation stage (stage1, stage2, stage3) for both Phase 1a strainmeter installations (FS01, f...
DeWolf, S. and Murdoch, L. Clemson University
Sep 15, 2022
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Core Analysis Results
This dataset features petrographic, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Scanning Electron Microscopy Analyses of core samples from well 16A(78)-32, which serves as the injection well for the Utah FORGE Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) project. In addition to an overview of the analysis,...
Jones, C. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 22, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Altona Field Lab Inverse Model WRR 2020
Includes data for measured inert tracer breakthrough curves first reported in Hawkins (2020) (Water Resources Research). In addition, this submission includes the production well temperature measurements first reported in Hawkins et al. (2017a) (Water Resources Research, volume 53...
Tester, J. Cornell University
Jan 01, 2015
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Deep Wells Water and Gas Sampling with Analyses by ThermoChem (October, 2022)
This data includes a document that describes the effort to collect and analyze water and gas samples from deep Utah FORGE wells 16A(78)-32, 58-32, 56-32 and 78B-32 along with additional pdf files showing ThermoChem's analyses attached as an appendix.
Joness, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 26, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Discrete Fracture Network and Fracture Propagation Modelling
Design and Implementation of Innovative Stimulation Treatments to Maximize Energy Recovery Efficiency at the Utah Forge Site
Sharma, M. and Cao, M. University of Texas
Feb 07, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Microseismic Event Catalogues from the Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation in April, 2022
This dataset includes three microseismic event catalogues from the three stages of stimulation in April 2022 of well 16A(78)-32 derived by Geo Energie Suisse. Each spreadsheet contains source times, xy location, depth, and seismic moment magnitude. An animation of the order in whi...
Karvounis, D. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Oct 10, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Telluric Monitoring Experiment Transfer Functions
The Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) attempted a stimulation at well 16A(78)-32 during April and May 2022. We recorded telluric and magnetotelluric (MT) data before, during, and after the well stimulation experiment using the FORGE Telluric Monit...
Mendoza, K. and Wannamaker, P. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 27, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Phase 3 Native State Model: 2022 Update
This is the Phase 3 native state model update. The Phase 3 numerical model represents a significant subsurface volume below the FORGE site footprint. The model domain of 4.0 km x 4.0 km x 4.2 km is located approximately between depths of 4000 to 4200 meters below land surface. Thi...
Podgorney, R. and Liu, R. Idaho National Laboratory
Jul 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Hydrogeologic Windows: Regional Signature Detection for Blind and Traditional Geothermal Play Fairways applied to Southwestern New Mexico
Final Report describing regional signature detection for blind and traditional play fairways as part of Phase I of New Mexico Play Fairway Analysis. This project seeks to reduce exploration risk and identify new prospective targets using available geologic, geochemical, and geophy...
Bielicki, J. et al Los Alamos National Laboratory
Oct 16, 2015
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Altona, NY EGS Field Site Radon Study
Data include 222Rn activities and complimentary geochemical data for multiple field experiments as part of an EGS project
Brown, S. and Christensen, J. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sep 02, 2016
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32 Simplified Discrete Fracture Network Data
The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 01, 2021
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report
This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and pla...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 09, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 78-32 Capacity Test
This dataset includes an Excel spreadsheet with Utah FORGE Phase 2c Well 78-32 capacity data. It also includes a readme file discussing the data which also includes the well coordinates.
Kirby, S. and Gall, R. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jun 20, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Injection Test Data
This submission contains pressure and flow time series data from the reservoir testing of Well 58-32. These activities were part of the Utah FORGE Phase 2B site suitability confirmatory testing.
Podgorney, R. and McLennan, J. Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab: Modeling and Simulation Working Group Teleconference Series (1-98)
This submission contains the presentation slides and recordings from the first 98 EGS Collab Modeling and Simulation Working Group teleconferences. These teleconferences served three objectives for the project: 1) share simulation results, 2) communicate field activities and resul...
White, M. et al Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Feb 04, 2020
100 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
100 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Milford Deep Test Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Pressure and Temperature Logs
This archive consists of a pdf graphic log and a LAS text file representing the results of the pressure and temperature logs measured on Nov. 8th, 2018 from the Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1). The logs were taken by DI Drill Survey Services.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 08, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Logs and Data from Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1)
Data, logs, and graphics associated with the drilling and testing of Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 5-2615: Well 58-32 and 78-32 Poroelastic Properties
Lab data on permeability, grain bulk modulus, drained bulk modulus, Skempton's pore pressure coefficient, and Biot's effective stress coefficient for Utah Forge Well 58-32 and Well 78-32.
Work done as part of project number 5-2615 by the University of Oklahoma.
Ghassemi, A. and Zhou, X. University of Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Well 58-32 Granite Core Thermal Properties Test Results Report (Oct. 2021)
This is a presentaiton from Metarock Laboratories on the thermal properties of Utah FORGE well 58-32 granite core. The presentation includes pictures of core samples, core details for the samples (sample depths and size), sample thermal expansion test results, and radial velocity ...
Laboratories, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 29, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Project 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Development of a Downhole Tracer and pH Measurement Instrument for Application in Geothermal Wells
Due the high temperature and pressure conditions found in geothermal wells, tracer studies designed to elucidate properties of geothermal reservoirs are traditionally conducted by pulling liquid samples from the wellhead. These samples are then sent off for analysis in a fixed lab...
Hess, R. et al Sandia National Laboratories
Sep 11, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 2: Results of Tracer Tests
Multiple sets of tracer tests were conducted at the EGS Collab Testbed 2 on the 4100 L at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF), Lead, SD. The enclosed data package includes: tracer recovery results, water balance calculations and rationales, water flow measurement for ...
Neupane, G. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Jul 26, 2022
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible