Search GDR Data
Showing results 51 - 72 of 72.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Pressure Temperature Logs from Blundell Well 71-10, Beaver County
This archive contains an Excel spreadsheet with pressure and temperature logs from PacifiCorp well 71-10. This well is in the Blundell Power Plant geothermal well field near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Beaver County, Utah. The spreadsheet also contains UTM coordinates for the location ...
Foster, K. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 08, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Feasibility of a Deep Direct-Use Geothermal System at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Paper authored by Stumpf et al. for the 2018 Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting held in Reno, NV USA. Included with the paper is the Microsoft PowerPoint presentation made at the GRC meeting and data tables associated with some of the figures.
Stumpf, A. et al University of Illinois
Dec 31, 2018
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Exploration Best Practices on OpenEI
This is an electronic database detailing different types of, various phases of, best practices for, and cost and time associated with geothermal exploration techniques. The groups of exploration techniques included in the database are Data and Modeling Techniques, Downhole Techniq...
Young, K. National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Sep 20, 2013
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Validation of Innovative Exploration Technologies for Newberry Volcano: Drilling Summary
Drilling summary from validation of innovative exploration technologies for Newberry Volcano, including depths, dates, and drilling statistics from 2012
Jaffe, T. Davenport Newberry Holdings, LLC
Jan 01, 2012
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Temperature Gradient Database
This is a temperature gradient database for Utah, USA. It is located at the Utah Geological Survey. This contains data relevant to the Utah FORGE project.
Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 01, 2004
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Drilling Data for Student Competition
Diagnostic drilling data (Pason log files) from Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1), which was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site. This dataset includes both ...
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Core Analyses
This dataset contains final reports regarding stress measurements, permeability measurements, and mechanical properties from the core testing of well 58-32, in PDF format, and spreadsheets containing tables from the reports as part of Utah FORGE Phase 2B. Please refer to the repor...
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 30, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Schlumberger FMI Logs DLIS and XML files
This zipped data set includes Schlumberger FMI logs DLIS and XML files from Utah FORGE deep well 58-32. These include runs 1 (2226-7550 ft) and 2 (7440-7550 ft). Run 3 (7390-7527ft) was acquired during phase 2C.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 17, 2017
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Logs and Data from Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1)
Data, logs, and graphics associated with the drilling and testing of Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Milford Deep Test Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Pressure and Temperature Logs
This archive consists of a pdf graphic log and a LAS text file representing the results of the pressure and temperature logs measured on Nov. 8th, 2018 from the Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1). The logs were taken by DI Drill Survey Services.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 08, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Milford Triaxial Test Data and Summary from EGI labs
Six samples were evaluated in unconfined and triaxial compression, their data are included in separate excel spreadsheets, and summarized in the word document. Three samples were plugged along the axis of the core (presumed to be nominally vertical) and three samples were plugged ...
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 01, 2016
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Granite Core Thermal Properties Test Results Report (Oct. 2021)
This is a presentaiton from Metarock Laboratories on the thermal properties of Utah FORGE well 58-32 granite core. The presentation includes pictures of core samples, core details for the samples (sample depths and size), sample thermal expansion test results, and radial velocity ...
Laboratories, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 29, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Stress Logging Data
This spreadsheet consist of data and graphs from deep well 58-32 stress testing from 6900 7500 ft depth. Measured stress data were used to correct logging predictions of in situ stress. Stress plots shows pore pressure (measured during the injection testing), the total vertical in...
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 14, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Seismic Event Catalogue from the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
These are revised catalogs, related to the April, 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation (phases 1,2, & 3), provided by Geo Energie Suisse (GES) that include additional events at the start of Stage 1 and some tidying up of some locations. These catalogs also include events for additiona...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Nov 09, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress
Core-based in-situ stress estimation, Triaxial Ultrasonic Velocity (labTUV) data, and Deformation Rate Analysis (DRA) data for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 using triaxial ultrasonic velocity and deformation rate analysis. Report documenting a multi-component approach to characterizi...
Bunger, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Dec 13, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Logs
This dataset contains all well logs from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. This includes the mud log, Sanvean Technologies logs, and Schlumberger logs. Please see the file descriptions below for information about each log.
Gilmour, B. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 08, 2021
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Core Data
These datasets, images, and graphics were derived from core drilling and core that was extracted from Utah Forge deep well 58-32 (originally called MU-ESW1), near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WISE-CASING: Time Domain Reflectometry Data from Lab Experiment on Steel Pipe
The steel pipe experiment conducted in the lab was using 6 meter low-carbon steel pipe. We tested it with both dry and in-water condition. In the dry experimental setup, a coaxial cable acting as a return path in the air.
Wang, J. and Wu, Y. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jul 23, 2019
9 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
9 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WISE-CASING: Time Domain Reflectometry Data from Lab Experiment on Coaxial Cable
The coaxial-cable experiment conducted in the lab was with 80 m coaxial cable( RG-85). This experiment compares the TDR response between damaged and undamaged cable. For the damaged cable, the damaged section is in the middle (40 m). The amplitude of the data is mV with time (us).
Wu, Y. and Wang, J. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Mar 15, 2018
9 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
9 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WISE-CASING: Surface Seismic Survey at Cymric Field, California Central Valley
This test was conducted at the Chevron Cymric oilfield in the California central valley near Bakersfield. A reflected seismic signal was observed in all three components (x, y, z) of the 3-component Episensor geophone, as well as all phones on the single component array. The arriv...
Wu, Y. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 02, 2018
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WISE-CASING: Frequency Domain EM Data from Cymric Oil Field, CA
Cymric oil field frequency domain electromagnetic (FEM) data with two parts of data labeled Part 1 and Part 2. Part 1 utilizes an electrical source line parallel to the receiver line, while Part 2 utilizes an electrical source line at a 75 deg angle to the receiver line. Data are ...
Wang, J. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 30, 2019
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WISE-CASING: Seismic Experiment at Richmond Field Station, CA
This experiment is testing the tube waves reflected from the bottom of the well. We put six single-channel geophones on the surface and a 24-channel downhole hydrophone into the well. The well is about 30 meters deep. Just a steel casing in the sand formation, no cement.
Wu, Y. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 25, 2018
32 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
32 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible