Search GDR Data
Showing results 51 - 75 of 1217.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation Tracer Test Results
This archive contains data from the tracer test performed during the Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 stimulation. This includes:
1. the raw data file from Pason in the csv format;
2. a one-page Word document from Pason that explains the headers and units used in their data file;
3. an...
Rose, P. and Barker, B. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 16, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Life Cycle Water Consumption and Water Resource Assessment for Utility-Scale Geothermal Systems: An In-Depth Analysis of Historical and Forthcoming EGS Projects
This report is the third in a series of reports sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Program in which a range of water-related issues surrounding geothermal power production are evaluated. The first report made an initial attempt at quantifying the li...
Schroeder, J. et al Argonne National Laboratory
Aug 31, 2013
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
CO2 Push-Pull Dual (Conjugate) Faults Injection Simulations
This submission contains datasets and a final manuscript associated with a project simulating carbon dioxide push-pull into a conjugate fault system modeled after Dixie Valley-
sensitivity analysis of significant parameters and uncertainty prediction by data-worth analysis.
Datas...
Oldenburg, C. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jul 20, 2017
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Data
Pressure, temperature, and flow data from open-hole, upper perforation, and lower perforation well stimulations gathered from various tools collected at well 58-32 during phase 2C.
Best, S. Geothermal Resource Group
Apr 20, 2019
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stage 1 Pressure Falloff Analysis
This is an analysis of the pressure falloff in stage 1 fracture stimulation of FORGE well 16A(78)-32. The objective of this research is to understand the information content of the well stimulation data of FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. The Stage 1 step-rate test, a variant of the classic...
Kazemi, H. et al Colorado School of Mines
Aug 04, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Phase 1a Tensor Strainmeter Data for the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
Data from two Tensor Optical Fiber Strainmeters that were operational during Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the April, 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Each csv file contains data from each stimulation stage (stage1, stage2, stage3) for both Phase 1a strainmeter installations (FS01, f...
DeWolf, S. and Murdoch, L. Clemson University
Sep 15, 2022
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Telluric Monitoring Experiment Transfer Functions
The Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) attempted a stimulation at well 16A(78)-32 during April and May 2022. We recorded telluric and magnetotelluric (MT) data before, during, and after the well stimulation experiment using the FORGE Telluric Monit...
Mendoza, K. and Wannamaker, P. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 27, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation and Circulation Fiber Optics Reports Summer, 2024
This zip file contains reports discussing the use of fiber optics during well 16B(78)-32 stimulation and circulation tests in the summer of 2024. The reports cover the collection of strain rate and temperature change data during these well events. Theory, methods, and initial dat...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Sep 25, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Wells 16A(78)-32/16B(78)-32 Stimulation Program Report May 2024
This is the end of job report for the stimulation program run on wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 done during May 2024.
McClennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 19, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
Utah FORGE: Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Pressure and Circulation Data April, 2024
This dataset consists of all of the pressure pumping data for Utah FORGE Well16A78-32 fracturing stages, Well 16B78-32 fracturing stages, and a 9-hour circulation test which took place after all of the frac plugs were drilled out. Fracturing in the wells took place in stages from ...
England, K. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jun 03, 2024
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
First Tracer Test After Circulation in Desert Peak 27-15
Following the successful stimulation of Desert Peak target EGS well 27-15, a circulation test was initiated by injecting a conservative tracer (1,5-nds) in combination with a reactive tracer (7-amino-1,3-naphthalene disulfonate). The closest production well 74-21 was monitored ove...
Rose, P. University of Utah
Nov 16, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Simplified Discrete Fracture Network Data
The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 01, 2021
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
EGS Collab Experiment 1 Stimulation Data
Stimulation data from Experiment 1 of EGS Collab, which occurred on the 4850 ft level of the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF). A detailed description of the stimulation data is provided in the StimulationDataNotes.docx and is also available on the EGS Collab Wiki. A M...
Knox, H. et al Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Aug 13, 2020
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 2: Hydraulic Pressure Test Results
The EGS Collab experiment 2 was focused on testing shear stimulation techniques. Shear stimulation, in this case, means using hydraulic pressure to cause shear slip on preexisting fracture or fault planes such that the hydraulic conductivity of the fracture or fault increases. The...
Burghardt, J. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Feb 17, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Mapping Fracture Network Creation with Microseismicity During EGS Demonstrations
This a report for the project "Mapping Fracture Network Creation with Microseismicity During EGS Demonstrations". Effective enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) require optimal fracture networks for efficient heat transfer between hot rock and fluid. Microseismic mapping is a key too...
Templeton, D. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Apr 18, 2014
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Seismic Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Fracture Generation During EGS Resource Development Deviatoric MT, Fracture Network, and Final Report
This submission contains 167 deviatoric moment tensor (MT) solutions for the seismicity observed two years prior and three years post start of injection activities at The Geysers Prati 32 EGS Demonstration. Also included is a statistical representation of the properties of 751 fra...
Gritto, R. et al Array Information Technology
Sep 01, 2018
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Newberry EGS Demonstration: Repairing and Re-Stimulating Well 55-29 Report
The Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration in central Oregon, a 5 year project begun in 2010, tests recent technological advances designed to reduce the cost of power generated by EGS in a hot, dry well (NWG 55-29) drilled in 2008. First, the stimulation pumps used were designed to ru...
Cladouhos, T. et al AltaRock Energy Inc
Jul 03, 2015
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: FSB4, FSB5, & FSB6 Shallow Seismic Well Locations
This is a PDF file generated by Woolsey Land Surveying, P.C containing the surveyed locations, as located, in Latitude and Longitude degrees, of the Utah FORGE FSB4, FSB5, & FSB6 shallow seismic well locations.
Woolsey, S. and Larson, G. Woolsey Land Surveying
Mar 04, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 7-3639: Design and Implementation of a Novel Multi-Frac Stimulation Concept 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Design and Implementation of a Novel Multi-Frac Stimulation Concept by The University of Oklahoma, presented by Ahmad Ghassemi. This slide presentation video discusses the design and implementation of a reservoir stimulation concept improving near-wel...
Ghassemi, A. and Jeffery, R. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 02, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Daily Reports for the 2024 Stimulation of Wells 16A/16B(78)-32
The zip file below contains daily reports produced during the spring 2024 stimulation of wells 16A/16B(78)-32 at Utah FORGE . These reports cover a period from March 29th to April 28th, 2024. They discuss the activity on the rig each day, with each report containing information on...
Swearingen, L. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 08, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Production Logging Tests
These are production logging tests (PLT) results from Halliburton collected during the nine hour circulation test performed at Utah FORGE on April 27th, 2024. The circulation test involved injecting into well 16A(78)-32 and producing out of well 16B(78)-32) and was carried out af...
Haroun, F. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 27, 2024
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Fiber Optic Cumulative Strain Change and Strain Change Rate Data From Well 16A Stimulation at Well 16B
This dataset includes Rayleigh Frequency Shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) cumulative strain change and change rate data. The data was acquired during the stimulation of Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32 in April 2024 via fiber installed in Well 16B(78)-32. The fiber optic da...
Khatara, S. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Nov 06, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Updated Well, Well Pad, and Seismic Station GPS Coordinates December, 2021
This is a CSV spreadsheet containing UTM and Latitude and Longitude coordinates and elevations for Wells 78-32, 78B-32, 56-32, 58-32, 68-32, and 16A(78)-32 and seismic stations BOR1, BOR2, BOR3, FOR1, FOR2, FOR5, FOR6, FOR 7, FOR8, FORK, FORU, FORW, and FORB. These are from a GPS ...
Erickson, B. Utah Geological Survey
Dec 13, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Lab-Scale Stimulation Results on Surrogate Fused Silica Samples
Lab-scale stimulation work on non-porous fused silica (similar mechanical properties to igneous rock) was performed using pure water, pure CO2 and water/CO2 mixtures to compare back to back fracturing performance of these fluids with PNNL's StimuFrac.
Fernandez, C. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jul 06, 2016
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible