Search GDR Data

Showing results 1 - 25 of 82.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Clear All Filters ×
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
"Microearthquake locations"×
EGS×

Brady's Geothermal Field Seismic Network Metadata

Brady's geothermal field seismic network station locations and dates of operation.
Foxall, W. University of Wisconsin
Dec 21, 2014
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Data Arrays for Microearthquake (MEQ) Monitoring using Deep Learning for the Newberry EGS Sites

The 'Machine Learning Approaches to Predicting Induced Seismicity and Imaging Geothermal Reservoir Properties' project looks to apply machine learning (ML) methods to Microearthquake (MEQ) data for imaging geothermal reservoir properties and forecasting seismic events, in order to...
Zhu, T. Pennsylvania State University
May 05, 2021
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: Microseismic Monitoring

The U.S. Department of Energy's Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Collab project aims to improve our understanding of hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock for enhanced geothermal energy production through execution of intensely monitored meso-scale experiments. The first expe...
Schoenball, M. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jul 29, 2019
46 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Improved Microseismicity Detection During Newberry EGS Stimulations

Effective enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) require optimal fracture networks for efficient heat transfer between hot rock and fluid. Microseismic mapping is a key tool used to infer the subsurface fracture geometry. Traditional earthquake detection and location techniques are oft...
Templeton, D. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Nov 01, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Improved Microseismicity Detection During Newberry EGS Stimulations

Effective enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) require optimal fracture networks for efficient heat transfer between hot rock and fluid. Microseismic mapping is a key tool used to infer the subsurface fracture geometry. Traditional earthquake detection and location techniques are oft...
Templeton, D. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Oct 01, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: 3D Seismic Velocity Model and Updated Microseismic Catalog from Double-Difference Seismic Tomography

This package contains a 3D Seismic velocity model and an updated microseismic catalog obtained for a double-difference seismic tomography study. The 3D_seismic_velocity_model text file contains x (m), y(m), z(m), P-wave velocity (km/s), P-wave velocity quality indicator (1 for we...
Chai, C. et al Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jun 01, 2020
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Mapping Fracture Network Creation with Microseismicity During EGS Demonstrations

This a report for the project "Mapping Fracture Network Creation with Microseismicity During EGS Demonstrations". Effective enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) require optimal fracture networks for efficient heat transfer between hot rock and fluid. Microseismic mapping is a key too...
Templeton, D. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Apr 18, 2014
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Stress Ratio Dependence of Ultrasonic Anisotropy in Well 16B(78)-32 Core

This dataset contains high-pressure ultrasonic measurements on a foliated granitoid core from Well 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site. Ultrasonic P-waves and two orthogonal S-waves were measured concurrently parallel and perpendicular to the rock fabric. All measurements were mad...
Lisabeth, H. and Savage, H. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 07, 2025
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Hybrid machine learning model to predict 3D in-situ permeability evolution

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) can provide a sustainable and renewable solution to the new energy transition. Its potential relies on the ability to create a reservoir and to accurately evaluate its evolving hydraulic properties to predict fluid flow and estimate ultimate therm...
Elsworth, D. and Marone, C. Pennsylvania State University
Nov 22, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Regional Well Locations

This archive contains a GIS point feature shapefile that shows the locations of wells in the general region of the Utah FORGE project, near Roosevelt Hot Springs. This includes Utah FORGE deep well 58-32 and wells for which data has been uploaded to the Geothermal Data Repository....
Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 22, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Initial 3D Gravity Results at Newberry

Initial 3D gravity results from Zonge Int'l recorded for the 4D EGS Monitoring project at Newberry, during stimulation of Well 55-29 by AltaRock Energy
Rose, K. National Energy Technology Laboratory
Jul 31, 2015
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 2: Preliminary Test Wells Locations and Orientations

The EGS Collab project is evaluating a site for Experiment 2 (hydraulic fracturing/shearing) at a depth of 1.25 km in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) on the 4100 Level. Two early test holes were drilled in an alcove (formerly known as Battery Charging Station) nea...
Neupane, G. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 19, 2019
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Brady's Geothermal Field Active Source Seismic Survey MetaData

Sweep parameters, source locations and trigger timing for the four Phases of active source seismic data acquisition.
Robertson, M. University of Wisconsin
Mar 28, 2016
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: X-Ray Diffraction Data

This dataset contains X-ray diffraction (XRD) data taken from wells and outcrops as part of the DOE GTO supported Utah FORGE project located near Roosevelt Hot Springs. It contains an Excel spreadsheet with the XRD data, a text file with sample site names, types, and locations in ...
Nash, G. and Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 07, 2018
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: Well Locations and Orientations.

The EGS Collab is conducting experiments in hydraulic fracturing at a depth of 1.5 km in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) on the 4850 Level. A total of eight ~60m-long subhorizontal boreholes were drilled at that depth on the western rib of the West Access Drift. S...
Neupane, G. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Sep 05, 2018
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Borehole Sensors and Well Trajectories (April 2022)

This link leads to a webpage with spreadsheets containing seismic borehole sensor locations and well trajectories for wells 56-32, 58-32, 78-32, 78B-32. Each of the files at the provided link include meta data on relevant information.
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Dec 23, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Brady's Geothermal Field March 2016 Vibroseis SEG-Y Files and UTM Locations

PoroTomo March 2016 Updated vibroseis source locations with UTM locations. Supersedes gdr.openei.org/submissions/824. Updated vibroseis source location data for Stages 1-4, PoroTomo March 2016. This revision includes source point locations in UTM format (meters) for all four Stage...
Feigl, K. University of Wisconsin
Mar 31, 2016
10 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

MT Data: Newberry 4D Monitoring EGS Project

This submission contains a link to the EDX Collaborative Workspace where the MT data collected in support of the DOE GTO 4D EGS monitoring project is stored. Daily production reports- Oregon State University (OSU) had 6 stations running continuously. --Dynamic survey map, KML f...
Rose, K. National Energy Technology Laboratory
Apr 12, 2016
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: MT Stations and Raw Data

There are two zipped folders in this submission. One contains a shapefile with the position of MT stations around the Milford FORGE Site, while the other has the raw MT data.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 09, 2016
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 2022 Stimulation Microseismic Report

This is a Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 stimulation microseismic detection and event location report from Silixa LLC. The report covers the digital acoustic sensing (DAS) data acquisition and analysis used to study microseismic events during the April, 2022 stimulations at well 16A(7...
LLC, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 26, 2022
1 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Ground Water Level Monitoring Data

Groundwater data around the Utah FORGE site has been collected to determine the piezometric levels and compositional variability. Field measurements in 2020 are designed to obtain and survey new groundwater wells that have been drilled on the distal periphery of the Utah FORGE pro...
Kirby, S. Utah Geological Survey
Sep 30, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Resource Potential Estimate

Compilation of data (spreadsheet and shapefiles) for several low-temperature resource types, including isolated springs and wells, delineated area convection systems, sedimentary basins and coastal plains sedimentary systems. For each system, we include estimates of the accessible...
Mullane, M. et al National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Jun 30, 2016
3 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

EGS Collab Experiment 1: Earth Model Input Files

The EGS Collab is conducting experiments in hydraulic fracturing at a depth of 1.5 km in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) on the 4850 Level. A total of eight ~60m-long subhorizontal boreholes were drilled at that depth on the western rib of the West Access Drift. S...
Neupane, G. and Sigma-V, T. Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 19, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations

This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area: An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Updated Seismic Event Catalogue from the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32

These are revised catalogs, related to the April, 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation (phases 1,2, & 3), provided by Geo Energie Suisse (GES) that include additional events at the start of Stage 1 and some tidying up of some locations. These catalogs also include events for additiona...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Nov 09, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1234Next >>