OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Instructions for Funds Recipients
    • Data Provision Guidelines
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 1 - 8 of 8.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters Clear All Filters ×
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
"core logs"×
Microseismicity×

Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations

This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area: An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

kISMET Final Report and Highlights

The files in this submission describes the results of a series of stress measurement and hydraulic fracturing experiments conducted at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) in Lead, SD. This report describes the accomplishments of the kISMET (permeability (k) and Induce...
Oldenburg, C. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Oct 31, 2016
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 2-2404: Determination of Reservoir-Scale Stress State Presentation Slides

This PowerPoint summarizes the integration of multiple approaches and data to constrain wellbore stress models at Utah FORGE. This stress determination used faulting theory, breakouts, and drilling-induced cracks detected in image logs. Wellbore stress profiles were established f...
Ghassemi, A. et al The University of Oklahoma
Jul 31, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Microseismic Monitoring Geophone Data from Well 78-32

This submission includes geophone data collected by Schlumberger from Utah FORGE Phase 2C seismic monitoring well 78-32 during stimulation testing of well 58-32. The data are hosted by the Center for High Performance Computing (CHPC) at the University of Utah, and a script for dow...
Pankow, K. University of Utah
Mar 18, 2020
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: High-Resolution DAS Microseismic Data from Well 78-32

This regards a high-resolution DAS microseismic dataset produced by Silixa from Utah FORGE Phase 2C seismic monitoring well 78-32 during stimulation testing of well 58-32. It is a very large dataset and as such it is currently not directly available on GDR. However, it is availabl...
Martin, T. and Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 20, 2019
5 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018

This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic survey...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Newberry EGS Demonstration: Well 55-29 Stimulation Data

The Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration in central Oregon, a 3 year project started in 2010, tests recent technological advances designed to reduce the cost of power generated by EGS in a hot, dry well (NWG 55-29) drilled in 2008. First, the stimulation pumps used were designed to ...
T., T. AltaRock Energy Inc
Dec 08, 2012
136 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Fault Shear Reactivation Experimental Data for Fluid Injection-Rate Controls on Seismic Moment

Included are experimental data recorded from shear experiments that specifically explore the link between fluid-injection rate and seismic moment resulting from shear reactivation of laboratory faults. Raw mechanical data from three experiments are included alongside corresponding...
Roseboom, M. et al Pennsylvania State University
Nov 07, 2023
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR is the submission point for all data collected from research funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Geothermal Technologies Office.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service