Simulations of Brady's-Type Fault Undergoing CO2 Push-Pull: Pressure-Transient and Sensitivity Analysis
Input and output files used for fault characterization through numerical simulation using iTOUGH2. The synthetic data for the push period are generated by running a forward simulation (input parameters are provided in iTOUGH2 Brady GF6 Input Parameters.txt [InvExt6i.txt]). In general, the permeability of the fault gouge, damage zone, and matrix are assumed to be unknown. The input and output files are for the inversion scenario where only pressure transients are available at the monitoring well located 200 m above the injection well and only the fault gouge permeability is estimated. The input files are named InvExt6i, INPUT.tpl, FOFT.ins, CO2TAB, and the output files are InvExt6i.out, pest.fof, and pest.sav (names below are display names).
The table graphic in the data files below summarizes the inversion results, and indicates the fault gouge permeability can be estimated even if imperfect guesses are used for matrix and damage zone permeabilities, and permeability anisotropy is not taken into account.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - Input and output files used for fault characterization through numerical simulation using iTOUGH2. The synthetic data for the push period are generated by running a forward simulation (input parameters are provided in iTOUGH2 Brady GF6 Input Parameters.txt [InvExt6i.txt]). In general, the permeability of the fault gouge, damage zone, and matrix are assumed to be unknown. The input and output files are for the inversion scenario where only pressure transients are available at the monitoring well located 200 m above the injection well and only the fault gouge permeability is estimated. The input files are named InvExt6i, INPUT.tpl, FOFT.ins, CO2TAB, and the output files are InvExt6i.out, pest.fof, and pest.sav (names below are display names).
The table graphic in the data files below summarizes the inversion results, and indicates the fault gouge permeability can be estimated even if imperfect guesses are used for matrix and damage zone permeabilities, and permeability anisotropy is not taken into account.
AU - Jung, Yoojin
A2 - Doughty, Christine
DB - Geothermal Data Repository
DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory
DO - 10.15121/1452750
KW - geothermal
KW - energy
KW - EGS
KW - CO2
KW - carbon dioxide
KW - push-pull
KW - pressure-transient testing
KW - iTOUGH2
KW - sensitivity analysis
KW - inverse modeling
KW - parameter estimation
KW - INCON
KW - PEST
KW - TOUGH2
KW - fault modeling
KW - GF6
KW - Brady
KW - faulting
KW - fault
KW - fracture
KW - characterization
KW - stimulation
LA - English
DA - 2018/03/09
PY - 2018
PB - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
T1 - Simulations of Brady's-Type Fault Undergoing CO2 Push-Pull: Pressure-Transient and Sensitivity Analysis
UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1452750
ER -
Jung, Yoojin, and Christine Doughty. Simulations of Brady's-Type Fault Undergoing CO2 Push-Pull: Pressure-Transient and Sensitivity Analysis. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 9 March, 2018, Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1452750.
Jung, Y., & Doughty, C. (2018). Simulations of Brady's-Type Fault Undergoing CO2 Push-Pull: Pressure-Transient and Sensitivity Analysis. [Data set]. Geothermal Data Repository. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.15121/1452750
Jung, Yoojin and Christine Doughty. Simulations of Brady's-Type Fault Undergoing CO2 Push-Pull: Pressure-Transient and Sensitivity Analysis. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, March, 9, 2018. Distributed by Geothermal Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15121/1452750
@misc{GDR_Dataset_1019,
title = {Simulations of Brady's-Type Fault Undergoing CO2 Push-Pull: Pressure-Transient and Sensitivity Analysis},
author = {Jung, Yoojin and Doughty, Christine},
abstractNote = {Input and output files used for fault characterization through numerical simulation using iTOUGH2. The synthetic data for the push period are generated by running a forward simulation (input parameters are provided in iTOUGH2 Brady GF6 Input Parameters.txt [InvExt6i.txt]). In general, the permeability of the fault gouge, damage zone, and matrix are assumed to be unknown. The input and output files are for the inversion scenario where only pressure transients are available at the monitoring well located 200 m above the injection well and only the fault gouge permeability is estimated. The input files are named InvExt6i, INPUT.tpl, FOFT.ins, CO2TAB, and the output files are InvExt6i.out, pest.fof, and pest.sav (names below are display names).
The table graphic in the data files below summarizes the inversion results, and indicates the fault gouge permeability can be estimated even if imperfect guesses are used for matrix and damage zone permeabilities, and permeability anisotropy is not taken into account.
},
url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1019},
year = {2018},
howpublished = {Geothermal Data Repository, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.15121/1452750},
note = {Accessed: 2025-04-25},
doi = {10.15121/1452750}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1452750
Details
Data from Mar 9, 2018
Last updated May 20, 2024
Submitted Mar 9, 2018
Organization
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Contact
Curtis Oldenburg
510.486.7419
Authors
Keywords
geothermal, energy, EGS, CO2, carbon dioxide, push-pull, pressure-transient testing, iTOUGH2, sensitivity analysis, inverse modeling, parameter estimation, INCON, PEST, TOUGH2, fault modeling, GF6, Brady, faulting, fault, fracture, characterization, stimulationDOE Project Details
Project Name Push-pull well testing using CO2 with active source geophysical monitoring
Project Lead Sean Porse
Project Number EE0001554
