Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data
This dataset contains drilling core data from well 16B(78)-32, including PDF documents with flattened core images annotated by feature type and core interval, as well as spreadsheets detailing feature morphologies by depth, planar feature measurements, and planar feature orientations rotated to in situ conditions. Core was recovered from three intervals, one per stimulation stage, in the crystalline rocks affected by the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Seven core runs were conducted, yielding 135.8 feet of recovered core.
Features in the core were categorized into planar fractures, semi-planar fractures, unbroken mineralized fractures, rough fractures, curviplanar fractures, concave-convex surfaces, and planar compositional features such as mylonite or dike-like structures. Planar features were measured while the core was positioned horizontally, with the core axis aligned to a downhole azimuth of 42 degrees.
Planar core measurements from stimulations 2 and 3 that could be confidently correlated with FMI data were rotated to in situ orientations. This was done by rotating the planes along vertical and horizontal axes to match the azimuth and inclination data recorded in the directional survey of well 16B(78)-32, as well as applying an axial rotation to resemble the fracture orientations observed in the FMI log at corresponding depths. Coherent sets of planar fracture measurements were made by aligning the core within each 3-foot section of the dissected core barrel, and between adjacent 3-foot sections within a core run by matching rock fabrics, saw cuts and/or tool marks. Where coherent fracture measurements could not be made within a core run, data sets are denoted by a subscript (i.e. 2-Ta and 2-Tb both come from tangent core run number 2).
Citation Formats
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah. (2025). Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data [data set]. Retrieved from https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1708.
Jones, Clay. Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data. United States: N.p., 29 Jan, 2025. Web. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1708.
Jones, Clay. Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data. United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1708
Jones, Clay. 2025. "Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data". United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1708.
@div{oedi_1708, title = {Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data}, author = {Jones, Clay.}, abstractNote = {This dataset contains drilling core data from well 16B(78)-32, including PDF documents with flattened core images annotated by feature type and core interval, as well as spreadsheets detailing feature morphologies by depth, planar feature measurements, and planar feature orientations rotated to in situ conditions. Core was recovered from three intervals, one per stimulation stage, in the crystalline rocks affected by the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Seven core runs were conducted, yielding 135.8 feet of recovered core.
Features in the core were categorized into planar fractures, semi-planar fractures, unbroken mineralized fractures, rough fractures, curviplanar fractures, concave-convex surfaces, and planar compositional features such as mylonite or dike-like structures. Planar features were measured while the core was positioned horizontally, with the core axis aligned to a downhole azimuth of 42 degrees.
Planar core measurements from stimulations 2 and 3 that could be confidently correlated with FMI data were rotated to in situ orientations. This was done by rotating the planes along vertical and horizontal axes to match the azimuth and inclination data recorded in the directional survey of well 16B(78)-32, as well as applying an axial rotation to resemble the fracture orientations observed in the FMI log at corresponding depths. Coherent sets of planar fracture measurements were made by aligning the core within each 3-foot section of the dissected core barrel, and between adjacent 3-foot sections within a core run by matching rock fabrics, saw cuts and/or tool marks. Where coherent fracture measurements could not be made within a core run, data sets are denoted by a subscript (i.e. 2-Ta and 2-Tb both come from tangent core run number 2).
}, doi = {}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1708}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2025}, month = {01}}
Details
Data from Jan 29, 2025
Last updated Jan 29, 2025
Submitted Jan 29, 2025
Organization
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Contact
Clay Jones
801.585.3540
Authors
Keywords
geothermal, energy, Utah FORGE, Well 16B78-32, Well 16B78-32 core, 16B78-32, 16B78-32 core, core, drilling core, core fracture analysis, Well 16B78-32 core fracture analysis, drill core fracture analysis, EGS, drilling core data, fracture stages, core images, planar features, feature morphology, FMI, crystalline rock, core measurements, fracture characterization, stimulation, imagingDOE Project Details
Project Name Utah FORGE
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0007080