Search GDR Data
Showing results 126 - 150 of 210.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2417: Pulsed Interference Tests at Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 September 2024
This archive contains data and a report from Pulse Interference Tests (PITs), which were conducted on September 4, 2024, immediately following a 30-day recirculation test at the Utah FORGE site. Injection and backflow were induced in well 16A(78)-32 while pressures were measured i...
W Becker, M. et al Rice University
Mar 18, 2025
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Development of a Reservoir Seismic Velocity Model and Seismic Resolution Study
This is data from and a final report on the development of a 3D velocity model for the larger FORGE area and on the seismic resolution in the stimulated fracture volume at the bottom of well 16A-32. The velocity model was developed using RMS velocities of the seismic reflection su...
Vasco, D. and Chan, C. Array Information Technology
Apr 30, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Seismograph Station Information and Data
This link leads to the University of Utah Seismograph Stations website Utah FORGE seismograph stations page. This page contains a location map and description of the Utah FORGE seismograph stations and other related information. Additionally, data can be downloaded for each statio...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jan 26, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Cape EGS: Frisco 2-P Well Stimulation Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco 2-P well stimulation project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between June 1 and June 11, 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed ...
Dadi, S. and Titov, A. Fervo Energy
Sep 19, 2024
26 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
26 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2446: Characterizing Stress Roughness Through Simulation of Hydraulic Fracture Growth
This dataset covers work that investigated the apparent toughness anisotropy at Utah FORGE by comparing microseismic data with stress profiles from field measurements. The study analyzes the hydraulic fracture growth of Stage 3 at Well 16A(78)-32 using MEQ data, calibrating a nume...
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jan 30, 2025
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2024 Annual Report on Activities and Advancements
This 2024 annual report for Phase 3B Year 2 at Utah FORGE provides an in-depth account of activities and advancements made at the site. Key achievements include drilling and stimulating the production well 16B(78)-32, creating a geothermal reservoir, and achieving commercial-scale...
McLennan, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jan 27, 2025
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Triaxial Direct Shear Results February 2025
This dataset contains results from nine triaxial direct shear tests conducted by Los Alamos National Laboratory on samples from FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. The primary objectives of this work were to determine the shear strength in both intact and residual states, evaluate dilation aga...
Frash, L. et al Los Alamos National Laboratory
Feb 28, 2025
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Cape EGS: Frisco Pad Wells Flow Test Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco pad flow test project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between July 17th Aug 12th 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed Acoustic...
Dadi, S. and Kanu, O. Fervo Energy
Nov 06, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Stimulation Crosswell Strain Response Fiber Optic Monitoring Report April 2024
This report documents the use of fiber optic Rayleigh frequency shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS), Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS), and microseismic data recorded during the hydraulic fracture stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, as detected in the offset well 16B(78)-...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Apr 03, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Fiber Optic Cumulative Strain Change and Strain Change Rate Data From Well 16A Stimulation at Well 16B
This dataset includes Rayleigh Frequency Shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) cumulative strain change and change rate data. The data was acquired during the stimulation of Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32 in April 2024 via fiber installed in Well 16B(78)-32. The fiber optic da...
Khatara, S. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Nov 06, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Temperature-Dependent Fracture Seismicity from Fluid Injection Experiments
This dataset contains experimental data from fluid injection experiments conducted to investigate the influence of temperature on fracture seismicity. The experiments were performed on granite samples from Utah FORGE. The samples were prepared with a 30-degree inclined fracture an...
Wang, J. et al Pennsylvania State University
Feb 29, 2024
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions
This report reviews the training of machine learning algorithms to laboratory triaxial ultrasonic velocity data for Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. Three machine learning (ML) predictive models were developed for the prediction of vertical and two orthogonally oriented horizontal str...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jun 19, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Well 16B(78)-32 Field-Test Data from Mini-Frac Tests
This submittal includes the field-test data collected during stress tests conducted in the Utah FORGE 16B(78)-32 wellbore to measure/characterize the stresses in the geothermal reservoir. The type of stress test performed is referred to as a mini-frac test or a micro-frac test. Th...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jul 02, 2023
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Joint Imaging of Fracture Growth and Estimation of Fracture Properties During EGS Development 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Joint Electromagnetic/Seismic/InSAR Imaging of Spatial-Temporal Fracture Growth and Estimation of Physical Fracture Properties During EGS Resource Development by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, presented by David Alumbaugh. This is a video pres...
Alumbaugh, D. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 25, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2024 Stimulations Microseismic Event Catalog from Seismic Surface Network
This archive provides a a link to a microseismic event catalog of the 2024 stimulations at Utah FORGE. The catalog was derived from data collected with the surface monitoring network consisting of 5 permanent seismic stations deployed by the University of Utah Seismograph Station...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jul 29, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Joint EM-Seismic-InSAR Imaging of Fracture Properties Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Joint Electromagnetic/Seismic/InSAR Imaging of Spatial-Temporal Fracture Growth and Estimation of Physical Fracture Properties During EGS Resource Development project by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, presented by Dr. David Alumbaugh, Staff Sc...
Alumbaugh, D. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sep 08, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Compilation of Geodetic Data and Estimation of Associated Deformation
Report on possible geodetic signature of the 3 stimulations in April 2022 as well as a comparison with existing InSAR data gathered over the site before, during, and after the stimulation. In geothermal production it is important to understand the existing stress field and the cha...
Vasco, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 29, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report
This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and pla...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 09, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2-2446: Report on Laboratory Block Experiments with Six Different Combinations of Stresses and Rock Fabrics
This report documents a series of block-scale hydraulic fracturing experiments, simulating Utah FORGE conditions to investigate how different combinations of in situ stress regimes, well orientations, and thermal stress conditions influence fracture initiation and propagation. The...
Bunger, A. and Lu, Y. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jan 30, 2025
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Triaxial Direct Shear Results
This submission contains a report and associated data from triaxial direct shear tests conducted by Los Alamos National Laboratory. The samples used were sourced from 16A(78)-32 well core. The primary objectives of this test were to determine the shear strength in both intact an...
Frash, L. et al Los Alamos National Laboratory
Aug 14, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 3D Gravity Data
These resources describe the 3D geophysical inversion modeling of gravity data at the FORGE site near Milford, Utah. FORGE is the Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy and the site in Utah has been selected by the U.S. Dept. of Energy for a 5-year R&D program to t...
Hardwick, C. and Witter, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jun 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 3-2417: Meteorological Data During 2023 Completion/Circulation
This preliminary data archive includes meteorological data recorded at the Utah FORGE facility over the period of time including the completion/cementing of well 16B(78)-32 and the initial 2023 circulation test, largely occurring in June/July/August of 2023. This information may p...
Ajo-Franklin, J. Rice University
Jun 10, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2446: Connecting In Situ Stress and Wellbore Deviation to Near-Well Fracture Complexity using Phase-Field Simulations
This report presents a series of numerical experiments investigating the relationships among near-well fracture complexity, in situ stress conditions, and wellbore deviation. Using a phase-field modeling approach, the study explores how factors such as stress regimes, wellbore ori...
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jan 30, 2025
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report
This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices i...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Dec 11, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible