OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Instructions for Funds Recipients
    • Data Provision Guidelines
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 176 - 200 of 1202.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
"Utah aquifer data"×

Utah FORGE: Friction-Permeability-Seismicity Laboratory Experiments with Non-Linear Acoustics

Laboratory experimental data on saw-cut interface of Westerly Granite and Utah Forge granitoid rocks. Experiments include velocity-stepping and fluid pressure stepping experiments. Mechanical data from 3 ISCO pumps connected to a Temco pressure vessel measure axial, confining and ...
Eijsink, A. and Elsworth, D. Pennsylvania State University
Jul 08, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Microseismic Surface Network Catalogs for Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation 2022 and Circulation 2023

This dataset includes microseismic surface network catalogs for Utah FORGE. Data were recorded during the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32 in 2022 and the circulation tests between wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in 2023. Near-surface seismic monitoring during circulation experimen...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Feb 09, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Reports on Stress Prediction and Modeling for Well 16B(78)-32 May 2025

These two reports from the University of Pittsburgh document related efforts under Utah FORGE Project 2-2439v2 to estimate in-situ stresses in well 16B(78)-32 using laboratory data, machine learning models, and physics-based simulations. One report focuses on developing and valida...
Lu, G. et al University of Pittsburgh
Jun 05, 2025
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Utah FORGE 3-2535: Report on Geodetic Observations of Fracture Development During April 2024 Stimulations

This report presents geodetic observations from the April 2024 stimulations at the Utah FORGE site, as part of LBNL FORGE Project 3-2535. It focuses on Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) data from an optical fiber in well 16B, capturing localized strain linked to fracture propagatio...
Vasco, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 28, 2025
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Utah FORGE: Injection and Production Test results and Reports from August 2024

This dataset includes results and reports from the injection/production test for wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in August, 2024 at Utah FORGE. Materials include injection, post stimulation production, flow rate, gamma, temperature and pressure survey results. For the respective ...
Kolomytsev, L. and Chadwick, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 24, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) FMI Log Fracture Results

A Schlumberger Fullbore Formation Micro-Imager (FMI) log was run from 7390 feet to 7527 feet depth in well 58-32, originally known as well MU-ESW1. Well 58-32 was completed in 2017 as part of Utah FORGE Phase 2. It reached a depth of 7536 feet and recorded a bottom hole temperatur...
BLOCHOWICZ, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 06, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress

Core-based in-situ stress estimation, Triaxial Ultrasonic Velocity (labTUV) data, and Deformation Rate Analysis (DRA) data for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 using triaxial ultrasonic velocity and deformation rate analysis. Report documenting a multi-component approach to characterizi...
Bunger, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Dec 13, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Sludge XRF

This is an Excel spreadsheet containing the results of X-ray fluorescence from well 56-32 sludge samples. The instrumentation used was a Olympus Vanta M series handheld XRF analyzer. A glass (SiO2) "blank" was analyzed at the beginning and end of each sample batch to detect contam...
Smith, K. Utah Geological Survey
Jul 15, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 5-2615: Laboratory Data for Insights on Hydraulic Fracture Closure and Stress Measurement

This dataset includes data from injection/fall-off experiments conducted in controlled laboratory settings. The aim is to investigate the physics governing fracture closure and the associated stress measurements during hydraulic fracturing. These time series data include flow rat...
Ye, Z. and Ghassemi, A. University of Oklahoma
Jun 12, 2024
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Triaxial Direct Shear Results

This submission contains a report and associated data from triaxial direct shear tests conducted by Los Alamos National Laboratory. The samples used were sourced from 16A(78)-32 well core. The primary objectives of this test were to determine the shear strength in both intact an...
Frash, L. et al Los Alamos National Laboratory
Aug 14, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 3-2417: DAS Microseismic Event Catalog from the 16A/16B Circulation Test, 2023

This preliminary data archive includes the relocated microseismic event catalog, 1D velocity model, and methods report from DAS acquisition conducted during the Well 16A and 16B circulation test (July 19th and 20th, 2023) at Utah FORGE. The methods report describes all processing ...
Vera Rodriguez, I. et al Rice University
Jun 12, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Hydraulic Fracturing Stage 8 Crosswell Strain FDI and Microseismic Presentations April 2024

This is a pair of PowerPoint presentations from Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC. The presentations review work done in April 2024 on crosswell strain fracture driven interactions (FDI) and microseismic event monitoring during hydraulic fracturing in stage 8 of Utah FORGE well 16...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Nov 07, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 3-2417: DAS Microseismic Event Catalog from the April 2024 Stimulation Experiment

This data archive includes the relocated microseismic event catalog and 3D velocity model from DAS acquisition conducted during the 16A stimulations that took place between April 3rd and April 7th, 2024. Data utilized were from the FOGMORE 16B DAS dataset (Silixa Carina), the 78B ...
Vera Rodriguez, I. et al Rice University
Jun 09, 2025
12 Resources
0 Stars
In curation

Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Hydraulic Fracturing In-Well DAS Fiber Optic Monitoring Report April 2024

The report reviews results obtained by Neubrex using Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) during the 16B(78)-32 hydraulic fracturing operations, Stages 1–4. It details DAS data acquisition, processing, and analysis, with a focus on acoustic noise signatures recorded during each st...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Apr 26, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 3-2535: Numerical Modeling of Energized Steel-Casing Source for Imaging Stimulated Zone

This short report details and tests the workflow that will be used to simulate steel well casings in deviated production/extraction boreholes at at the Utah FORGE site. Boreholes will be electrically energized and will serve as data sources for future proposed electromagnetic bore...
Um, E. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Nov 15, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Characterizing Stress Roughness Through Simulation of Hydraulic Fracture Growth

This dataset covers work that investigated the apparent toughness anisotropy at Utah FORGE by comparing microseismic data with stress profiles from field measurements. The study analyzes the hydraulic fracture growth of Stage 3 at Well 16A(78)-32 using MEQ data, calibrating a nume...
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jan 30, 2025
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Phase 3A, Year 2, Annual Report

This is the annual report for Utah FORGE Phase 3A, year two, which was published on July 28th, 2022. The report includes site infrastructure, site operations, seismic monitoring reports, FORGE modeling reports, and external research and design. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Production Logging Tests

These are production logging tests (PLT) results from Halliburton collected during the nine hour circulation test performed at Utah FORGE on April 27th, 2024. The circulation test involved injecting into well 16A(78)-32 and producing out of well 16B(78)-32) and was carried out af...
Haroun, F. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 27, 2024
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Drilling Data for Student Competition

Diagnostic drilling data (Pason log files) from Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1), which was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site. This dataset includes both ...
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Hydraulic Fracture Width Determination Using Stoneley Wave Pressure Testing and Electrical Borehole Scans

This report provides insights into Utah FORGE well 58-32's hydraulic fractures. It utilizes both electrical borehole scans from Schlumberger's Formation Micro-scanner Image tool (FMI) and Stoneley waves from a borehole sonic tool. These methods are combined in a comprehensive work...
Hornby, B. Hornby Geophysical Services, LLC
Oct 06, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: GES Well 16A(78)-32 and Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Seismic Event Catalogs

This dataset contains seismic event catalogs from the hydraulic stimulation of wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site in April 2024. The data was collected by Geo Energy Suisse (GES) using a variety of seismic monitoring technologies, including 3-component (3C) geo...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Targeting Geothermal Resources with Geodetic Strain Data Paper

The paper linked below offers an initial assessment of a new method to target potential geothermal resources on the regional scale. The method is based on seeking relationships between geologic structures and geodetic observations of regional tectonic strain.
Blewitt, G. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 01, 2004
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Phase 3A Year 1 Annual Report for 2020

This is the Utah FORGE annual report for Phase 3A year 1, which was completed on December 28th, 2020. This report includes site infrastructure, site operations, seismic monitoring, a conceptual geological model, outreach, and communications for the Utah FORGE project during Phase ...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Dec 28, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: 16B(78)-32 RFS DSS Strain Change Rate vs. Depth During 16A(78)-32 Stimulation

This dataset contains strain change rate versus depth data acquired using a Rayleigh frequency shift (RFS) distributed strain sensing (DSS) system during hydraulic stimulation of well 16A(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site in April 2024. The data were collected from an optical fiber in...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Mar 02, 2025
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible

Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Cementing and Circulation Fiber Optics Monitoring Reports July, 2023

Included here are two fiber optics monitoring reports on Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32 from Neubrex Energy Services. These reports review the fiber optics monitoring during both the cementing and circulation test periods of the well. Cementing as well as post-cementing monitoring a...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Oct 21, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
<< Previous3456789101112Next >>
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR is the submission point for all data collected from research funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Geothermal Technologies Office.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service