Search GDR Data
Showing results 51 - 75 of 298.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Development of a Downhole Tool Measuring Real-Time Concentration of Ionic Tracers and pH in Geothermal Reservoirs
For enhanced or Engineered Geothermal Systems (EGS) geothermal brine is pumped to the surface via the production wells, the heat extracted to turn a turbine to generate electricity, and the spent brine re-injected via injection wells back underground. If designed properly, the sub...
Hess, R. et al Sandia National Laboratories
Mar 31, 2014
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Simplified Discrete Fracture Network Data
The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 01, 2021
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Injection Test Data
This submission contains pressure and flow time series data from the reservoir testing of Well 58-32. These activities were part of the Utah FORGE Phase 2B site suitability confirmatory testing.
Podgorney, R. and McLennan, J. Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Milford Deep Test Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Pressure and Temperature Logs
This archive consists of a pdf graphic log and a LAS text file representing the results of the pressure and temperature logs measured on Nov. 8th, 2018 from the Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1). The logs were taken by DI Drill Survey Services.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 08, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Logs and Data from Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1)
Data, logs, and graphics associated with the drilling and testing of Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 1: TOUGH2-CSM Simulation of Embedded Natural Fractures and Chemical Tracer Transport and Sorption
The EGS Collab SIGMA-V project is a multi-lab and university collaborative research project that is being undertaken at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) in South Dakota. The project consists of studying stimulation, fluid-flow, and heat transfer processes at a scal...
Johnston, B. et al National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Jun 07, 2019
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Granite Core Thermal Properties Test Results Report (Oct. 2021)
This is a presentaiton from Metarock Laboratories on the thermal properties of Utah FORGE well 58-32 granite core. The presentation includes pictures of core samples, core details for the samples (sample depths and size), sample thermal expansion test results, and radial velocity ...
Laboratories, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 29, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 5-2615: Well 58-32 and 78-32 Poroelastic Properties
Lab data on permeability, grain bulk modulus, drained bulk modulus, Skempton's pore pressure coefficient, and Biot's effective stress coefficient for Utah Forge Well 58-32 and Well 78-32.
Work done as part of project number 5-2615 by the University of Oklahoma.
Ghassemi, A. and Zhou, X. University of Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Circulation Test Daily Reports from August 2024
These are the daily reports created during and around the August 2024 circulation test done on wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site. Information about the rig activity during this period includes details on rig up, depths, pumping, water temperature, safety, and ...
Swearingen, L. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 04, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Cementing and Circulation Fiber Optics Monitoring Reports July, 2023
Included here are two fiber optics monitoring reports on Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32 from Neubrex Energy Services. These reports review the fiber optics monitoring during both the cementing and circulation test periods of the well. Cementing as well as post-cementing monitoring a...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Oct 21, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Stress Logging Data
This spreadsheet consist of data and graphs from deep well 58-32 stress testing from 6900 7500 ft depth. Measured stress data were used to correct logging predictions of in situ stress. Stress plots shows pore pressure (measured during the injection testing), the total vertical in...
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 14, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Circulation Test Fiber Optics Monitoring Data and Reports July, 2023
This dataset features Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and fiber optics monitoring data acquired by Neubrex Energy Services during the Utah FORGE Well 16B(78)-32 circulation test in July 2023. DAS and fiber optic monitoring data include absolute strain, strain change, strain ch...
Juric, D. and Guzik, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 31, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Caldwell Ranch Exploration and Confirmation Project, Northwest Geysers, CA: 2011 Geothermal Technologies Peer Review Project Summary
Caldwell Ranch Exploration and Confirmation Project, Northwest Geysers, CA: 2011 Geothermal Technologies Peer Review Project Summary
The Caldwell Ranch Exploration and Confirmation Project was to drill, test, and confirm the present economic viability of the undeveloped geothermal...
Walters, M. Geysers Power Company, LLC
Jan 01, 2011
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Well 16B(78)-32 Field-Test Data from Mini-Frac Tests
This submittal includes the field-test data collected during stress tests conducted in the Utah FORGE 16B(78)-32 wellbore to measure/characterize the stresses in the geothermal reservoir. The type of stress test performed is referred to as a mini-frac test or a micro-frac test. Th...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jul 02, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Report on Minifrac Tests for Stress Characterization
This report describes minifrac tests conducted in the 16B(78)-32 well at the Utah FORGE site to characterize subsurface stresses, including the magnitude and orientation of the minimum and maximum horizontal stresses and the magnitude of the vertical stress. A minifrac test was co...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Feb 22, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 58-32 Injection and Packer Performance, April and May 2019
This is a PDF format summary report regarding the performance of a packer, which failed, and bridge plug used during the injection program in Utah FORGE deep Well 58-32, April and May, 2019.
McLennan, J. and Podgorney, R. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 22, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates
Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injecti...
Hardwick, C. Utah Geological Survey
Dec 07, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Cape EGS: Frisco Pad Wells Flow Test Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco pad flow test project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between July 17th Aug 12th 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed Acoustic...
Dadi, S. and Kanu, O. Fervo Energy
Nov 06, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation and Circulation Fiber Optics Reports Summer, 2024
This zip file contains reports discussing the use of fiber optics during well 16B(78)-32 stimulation and circulation tests in the summer of 2024. The reports cover the collection of strain rate and temperature change data during these well events. Theory, methods, and initial dat...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Sep 25, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Conference Paper and Data
The U.S. Department of Energy's (U.S. DOE) Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is a field laboratory that provides a unique opportunity to develop and test new technologies for characterizing, creating and sustaining Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in ...
Best, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Distributed Temperature Sensing Data from April and May 2024
This dataset includes Neubrex Energy Services fiber optic distributed temperature sensing (DTS) data from well 16B(78)-32 during stimulation and circulation, including interaction with well 16A(78)-32, during April and May 2024. The DTS data are stored in HDF5 file format and are ...
Jurick, D. and Guzik, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 08, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Evaluation of Potential Geochemical Responses to Injection in the FORGE Geothermal Reservoir
Plugging of fracture porosity from mineral precipitation due to injecting cold water into a a geothermal reservoir can impact the overall permeability of the fracture network in the reservoir. This can have serious ramifications on the efficiency of the geothermal resource. Geoche...
Patil, V. and Simmons, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 03, 2019
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 1: Common Discrete Fracture Network
This package includes data and models that support hydraulic fracture stimulation and fluid circulation experiments in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF). A paper by Schwering et al. (2020) describes the deterministic basis for developing a "common" discrete fracture...
Schwering, P. et al Sandia National Laboratories
Sep 18, 2019
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible