Search GDR Data
Showing results 1 - 9 of 9.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Production Logging Tests
These are production logging tests (PLT) results from Halliburton collected during the nine hour circulation test performed at Utah FORGE on April 27th, 2024. The circulation test involved injecting into well 16A(78)-32 and producing out of well 16B(78)-32) and was carried out af...
Haroun, F. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 27, 2024
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) Data
The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. and Podgorney, R. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 24, 2020
66 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
66 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Simplified Discrete Fracture Network Data
The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 01, 2021
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Wister, CA Downhole and Seismic Data
This submission contains Downhole geophysical logs associated with Wister, CA Wells 12-27 and 85-20. The logs include Spontaneous Potential (SP), HILT Caliper (HCAL), Gamma Ray (GR), Array Induction (AIT), and Neutron Porosity (NPOR) data. Also included are a well log, Injection T...
Akerley, J. Ormat Nevada Inc
Dec 18, 2010
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 14-2 Logs and Data from Roosevelt Hot Spring Area
This is a compilation of logs and data from Well 14-2 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs area in Utah. This well is also in the Utah FORGE study area.
Data includes: flowmeter survey (1989), geochemistry (1977-1978, 1977-1983), injection test data (1979, 1982), and spinner surveys (19...
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 03, 2016
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Data
Pressure, temperature, and flow data from open-hole, upper perforation, and lower perforation well stimulations gathered from various tools collected at well 58-32 during phase 2C.
Best, S. Geothermal Resource Group
Apr 20, 2019
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Injection Test Data
This submission contains pressure and flow time series data from the reservoir testing of Well 58-32. These activities were part of the Utah FORGE Phase 2B site suitability confirmatory testing.
Podgorney, R. and McLennan, J. Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Conference Paper and Data
The U.S. Department of Energy's (U.S. DOE) Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is a field laboratory that provides a unique opportunity to develop and test new technologies for characterizing, creating and sustaining Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in ...
Best, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab: Modeling and Simulation Working Group Teleconference Series (1-98)
This submission contains the presentation slides and recordings from the first 98 EGS Collab Modeling and Simulation Working Group teleconferences. These teleconferences served three objectives for the project: 1) share simulation results, 2) communicate field activities and resul...
White, M. et al Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Feb 04, 2020
100 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
100 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible