Search GDR Data
Showing results 1 - 25 of 103.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation Tracer Test Results
This archive contains data from the tracer test performed during the Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 stimulation. This includes:
1. the raw data file from Pason in the csv format;
2. a one-page Word document from Pason that explains the headers and units used in their data file;
3. an...
Rose, P. and Barker, B. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 16, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation Data (April, 2022)
This is a set of data related to the stimulation program at Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 during April, 2022. This includes daily reports, 1 second Pason data, tracer data, and shear stimulation data and information including a report of an evolving prognosis for the stimulation oper...
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 18, 2022
11 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
11 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Logs
This dataset contains all well logs from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. This includes the mud log, Sanvean Technologies logs, and Schlumberger logs. Please see the file descriptions below for information about each log.
Gilmour, B. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 08, 2021
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Drilling Data
This dataset includes survey data, drilling data, daily reports, summaries of daily operations, and rig photos from the drilling of Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32, which is a highly deviated deep well. It was completed 60 days ahead of schedule.
Rig move in began 10/22/2020 and dril...
McLennan, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jan 08, 2021
15 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
15 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32: Summary of Drilling Activities
This is a 74 page detailed summary of the drilling activities of Utah FORGE 16A(78)-32, a highly deviated well completed on February 2nd, 2021, as part of the Utah FORGE project. This well was deviated at 65 degrees from vertical after reaching 6000 feet in depth had a total measu...
Winkler, D. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 20, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 2022 Stimulation Microseismic Report
This is a Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 stimulation microseismic detection and event location report from Silixa LLC. The report covers the digital acoustic sensing (DAS) data acquisition and analysis used to study microseismic events during the April, 2022 stimulations at well 16A(7...
LLC, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 26, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Seismic Event Catalogue from the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
These are revised catalogs, related to the April, 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation (phases 1,2, & 3), provided by Geo Energie Suisse (GES) that include additional events at the start of Stage 1 and some tidying up of some locations. These catalogs also include events for additiona...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Nov 09, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Planned Trajectory
This submission includes an Excel spreadsheet containing the Utah FORGE deep well 16A(78)-32 planned trajectory including UTM coordinates, elevations, and depths from the well head to the toe. This proposed new injection well is expected to descend vertically to a depth of approxi...
Podgorney, R. and Nash, G. Idaho National Laboratory
Mar 24, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Production Logging Tests
These are production logging tests (PLT) results from Halliburton collected during the nine hour circulation test performed at Utah FORGE on April 27th, 2024. The circulation test involved injecting into well 16A(78)-32 and producing out of well 16B(78)-32) and was carried out af...
Haroun, F. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 27, 2024
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
1 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Core Photos
Images of core samples collected from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. These images were created by stitching together multiple photographs resulting in a circumferential view of the cores exterior in two dimensions. Core footages (measured depths) are indicated in the file names, and ...
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 11, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Report on the Thermal Properties of Wells 16A(78)-32 & 58-32 Granite
This is a report from Metarock Laboratories on the thermal properties of Utah FORGE wells 16A(78)-32 & 58-32 granite. The report includes pictures of core samples, core details for the samples (where the sample was taken and the size of the sample), sample thermal expansion test r...
Laboratories, M. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 04, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data
This submission contains x-ray diffraction data taken from 3,600 to 10,987 feet deep in well 16A(78)-32 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs Geothermal Area as part of the Utah FORGE project. 78 rock samples were taken. Samples are taken in a range of ten feet at 100 foot increments. Mine...
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 29, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Updated FMI Fracture Log from Well 16A(78)-32
This dataset consists of an Excel spreadsheet detailing the fracture picks from a reinterpretation of the formation micro-imaging (FMI) log from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. The provided information details fracture location, geometry, and type. Also included here is a link to the...
Handwerger, D. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 17, 2024
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation DFN Fracture Plane Evaluation and Data
This dataset includes files used to fit planar fractures through the preliminary earthquake catalogs of the three stages of the April 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation which is linked bellow. These planar features have been used to update the FORGE reference Discrete Fracture Netwo...
Finnila, A. WSP Golder
Oct 27, 2022
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Powder X-ray Diffraction Data from Well 16A(78)-32 Core
This dataset from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) consists of four raw X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans and preliminary results of quantitative XRD analysis. The scanned samples were prepared from four subcores, which came from various depths of the FORGE well 16A(78)-3...
Kroll, K. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jul 27, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32/Well16B(78)-32 Circulation Test Data
This dataset encompasses the collected data and associated reports from the low-rate injection circulation test conducted on wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in July 2023 at Utah FORGE. It includes comprehensive raw circulation data, captured by Pason and Schlumberger (SLB). The da...
Mclennan, J. and Xing, P. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 19, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 1a Tensor Strainmeter Data for the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
Data from two Tensor Optical Fiber Strainmeters that were operational during Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the April, 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Each csv file contains data from each stimulation stage (stage1, stage2, stage3) for both Phase 1a strainmeter installations (FS01, f...
DeWolf, S. and Murdoch, L. Clemson University
Sep 15, 2022
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Core Analysis Results
This dataset features petrographic, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Scanning Electron Microscopy Analyses of core samples from well 16A(78)-32, which serves as the injection well for the Utah FORGE Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) project. In addition to an overview of the analysis,...
Jones, C. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 22, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress
Core-based in-situ stress estimation, Triaxial Ultrasonic Velocity (labTUV) data, and Deformation Rate Analysis (DRA) data for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 using triaxial ultrasonic velocity and deformation rate analysis. Report documenting a multi-component approach to characterizi...
Bunger, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Dec 13, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
EGS Collab Experiment 1: Tracer data tests
This file contains the first set of tracer data for the EGS Collab testbed. The first set of tracer tests were conducted during October-November, 2018. We have included tracer data for C-dots, chloride, fluorescein, and rhodamine-B. The details about the tracer test can be found i...
Neupane, G. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Apr 16, 2019
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Daily Reports for the 2024 Stimulation of Wells 16A/16B(78)-32
The zip file below contains daily reports produced during the spring 2024 stimulation of wells 16A/16B(78)-32 at Utah FORGE . These reports cover a period from March 29th to April 28th, 2024. They discuss the activity on the rig each day, with each report containing information on...
Swearingen, L. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 08, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
EGS Collab Experiment 1: Second Set Tracer Test Results
The EGS Collab project is developing ~10-20 m-scale field sites where fracture stimulation and flow models can be validated against controlled, small-scale, in-situ experiments. The first multi-well experimental site was established at the 4850 level in the Homestake Mine in Lead,...
Neupane, G. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 19, 2019
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Microseismic Surface Network Catalogs for Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation 2022 and Circulation 2023
This dataset includes microseismic surface network catalogs for Utah FORGE. Data were recorded during the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32 in 2022 and the circulation tests between wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in 2023. Near-surface seismic monitoring during circulation experimen...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Feb 09, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Perforation Images and Raw Data
This archive contains raw data of visual and acoustic mapping of perforations in Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 acquired during the August 2024 circulation program. The dataset includes downhole images captured by EV, a downhole visual analytics company, providing visual records of ea...
Saha, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 05, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Report on Predicting Far-Field Stresses Using Finite Element Modeling and Near-Wellbore Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32
This report presents the far-field stress predictions at two locations along the vertical section of Utah FORGE Well 16A (78)-32 using a physics-based thermo-poro-mechanical model. Three principal stresses in far-field were obtained by solving an inverse problem based on the near-...
Lu, G. et al University of Pittsburgh
Aug 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated