OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 226 - 250 of 384.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters Clear All Filters ×
Topic
Technologies
Demonstration Sites
Data Type
"Utah FORGE microgravity"×
Utah FORGE, UT×

Utah FORGE 3-2417: DAS-derived Moment Tensors from the 16A/16B Stimulation April, 2024

Aug 22, 2025
1.41 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains a catalog of moment tensors derived from distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data acquired during stimulation of Utah FORGE Well 16A, conducted between April 3 and April 7, 2024. The data were generated as part of the FOGMORE (Fiber Optic MOnitoring for Reserv...
Authors
Vera Rodriguez, I. et al Rice University
geothermalenergyutah forgedasmicroseismicmoment tensorenhanced geothermalegsfogmoresilixa16a stimulationdistributed acoustic sensingfiber opticsseismic monitoringstimulationmicroseismicitycarinaidasseismic inversiongeophysicssubsurface characterizationseismic momentconfidence indexcondition numbermoment catalogprocessed data

Utah FORGE 3-2417: Simulation Meshes and Results from Extended Circulation and Pulse Interference Testing

Sep 05, 2025
6.17 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains numerical simulation meshes and modeling results from extended circulation and pulse interference tests conducted between Utah FORGE wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32. The simulations were performed as part of the FOGMORE Utah FORGE project (Fiber Optic MOnitor...
Authors
Lee, S. and Ghassemi, A. Rice University
geothermalenergyutah forgeegsfogmoresimulationmeshreservoir modelingextended circulation testpulse interference testnumerical simulationmesh datapressure distributiontemperature distributionpermeability modelingstress-dependent permeabilitydiscrete fracture networkdfnfiber optic monitoring16a78-3216b78-32paraviewmodelmodel filesmodel results

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Characterizing Stress Roughness Through Simulation of Hydraulic Fracture Growth

Jan 30, 2025
2.55 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset covers work that investigated the apparent toughness anisotropy at Utah FORGE by comparing microseismic data with stress profiles from field measurements. The study analyzes the hydraulic fracture growth of Stage 3 at Well 16A(78)-32 using MEQ data, calibrating a nume...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgestress roughnesshydraulic fracturingmeqegsstress profilefield measurementshydraulic fracture growth16a78-32stage 3geostechnical reportprocessed datageophysics2-2446toughness anisotropyrock mechanics

Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Fiber Optic Monitoring Reports April and May, 2024

Apr 30, 2024
12.82 MB
Publicly accessible
These reports contain information on the distributed temperature sensing (DTS), distributed strain sensing (DSS), and pressure monitoring during the stimulation of Well 16(B)78-32 at Utah FORGE, in April and May 2024. Reports include information on data collection and calibrations...
Authors
Jurick, D. and Guzik, D. Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
geothermalenergyutah forgewell stimulationfracingtemperaturestrainstrain modelingfdineubrexpressure16b78-3216b78-32 stimulationutah forge 2024 stimulationdtsdssegstechnical reportreportprocessed data

Utah FORGE: QuantumPro Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation and Circulation Tracer Test Results 2024

Jan 07, 1970
5.38 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes results and supporting documentation from tracer tests conducted in 2024 at Utah FORGE. The tests involved injecting nanoparticle tracers into injection well 16A(78)-32 and monitoring their recovery in production well 16B(78)-32 to assess hydraulic connectivi...
Authors
Guo, Q. et al QuantumPro Inc.
geothermalenergy16b78-3216a78-32tracersquantumproutah forge16a16bstimulationcirculationflotrac nanoparticle tracernanoparticle tracertracer datatracer testegshydraulic connectivitytechnical reportprocessed dataflow contributiontracer recoveryinter-well flow mappingfracture networksampling process

Utah FORGE: GeoEnergie Suisse Microseismic Monitoring of 16A and 16B Circulation at Utah FORGE, August-September 2024

Jun 20, 2025
401.21 kB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains microseismic event data collected by Geo-Energie Suisse during circulation testing of wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site in August and September 2024. The data were recorded using a local monitoring network and include key event parameters...
Authors
Dyer, B. et al Geo-Energy Suisse
geothermalenergyutah forgemicroseismicseismicmicroseismic datawell circulation16a-783216b-7832geo-energy suisseegscatalogevent catalogmagnitudepeak ground velocitysnrevent locationgeophysicsseismic clusteringdepthprocessed data

Utah FORGE 3-2418: Wellbore Fracture Imaging Using Inflow Detection Measurements 2023 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 08, 2023
75.16 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Wellbore Fracture Imaging Using Inflow Detection Measurements project by Stanford University, presented by Dr. Roland N. Horne. The project's objective was to make measurements in the Utah FORGE wells, both before and after fracturing experiments, to...
Authors
Horne, R. and Su, J. Stanford University
geothermalenergyannual workshop2023utah forgeegsgeochemistrychloridefracture mappingflow monitoringreservoir characterizationion-specific electrodereservoir performanceconnectivityinflow detectionfracture imaging

Utah FORGE 3-2535: Compilation of Geodetic Data and Estimation of Associated Deformation

Apr 29, 2022
17.77 MB
Publicly accessible
Report on possible geodetic signature of the 3 stimulations in April 2022 as well as a comparison with existing InSAR data gathered over the site before, during, and after the stimulation. In geothermal production it is important to understand the existing stress field and the cha...
Authors
Vasco, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
geothermalenergyinsarground deformationcompressional velocity modelegsremote sensingwell characterizationwell 16awell 16butah forge

Utah FORGE: Faults, Fractures, and Lineaments in the Mineral Mountains

Mar 09, 2016
2.92 MB
Publicly accessible
This submission includes a shapefile of the Opal Mound Fault, and multiple datasets of lineaments mapped in the Mineral Mountains which overlook the Utah FORGE site, hyperlinked to rose diagrams in a polygon grid shapefile.
Authors
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalforgelineamentsfracturesfaultsutahmilfordopal moundlineamentfracturejointegsmineral mountainsfaultopalmoundshapefileshape filearcgisgeospatial datautah forgegeologystructuralroosevelt hot springsrose diagram

Utah FORGE 2-2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement 2023 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 08, 2023
67.35 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress at the U.S DOE FORGE EGS Site: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement project by Battelle [Columbus, OH], presented by Mark Kelley. The project's objective was to characterize stress in the U...
Authors
Kelley, M. and Bunger, A. Battelle Memorial Institute
geothermalenergyannual workshop2023utah forgeegsmachine learningin-situ stressstress characterizationmini-fracrock-core stress estimationsonic-log datamodelinglaboratory experimentsdeformation rate analysisboundary element methodsleeve frac packerfar-fieldnear-field

Utah FORGE: Powder X-ray Diffraction Data from Well 16A(78)-32 Core

Jul 27, 2023
4.28 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) consists of four raw X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans and preliminary results of quantitative XRD analysis. The scanned samples were prepared from four subcores, which came from various depths of the FORGE well 16A(78)-3...
Authors
Kroll, K. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgeforgellnllawrence livermore national laboratoryxrdx-ray diffractioncore xrdcore x-ray diffractionwell core studiesutah geothermal16a78-32well 16a78-3216a78-32 xrdgeologycoregeochemistryraw dataegs

Utah FORGE: Well Acord 1-26 Logs and Data: Roosevelt Hot Spring Area

Mar 03, 2016
91.14 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a compilation of logs and data from Well Acord 1-26 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs area in Utah. This well is also in the Utah FORGE study area. Logs include: mud log (45'-12645'), compensated densilog (1102'-7923', 7900'-12644'), neutron log (1102'-7923'), dual induction ...
Authors
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalforgeutah forgeegsutah egswell logsutah well logsgeothermal wellsutah geothermal wellsroosevelt hot springsroosevelt hot springcement bondgamma rayneutronporositycompensated densilogstratigraphic reportstratigraphypetrographydual inductionacousticacoustilogdensitytemperature logdifferentialsamplegeothermcalipermud logdrillers logwater rightspermission to drilldrilling planbond documentsacordutahacord 1-26well logwell dataresourcecharacterizationmilfordtemperaturedensilogcompensatedcuttings

Utah FORGE: Injection and Production Test results and Reports from August 2024

Sep 24, 2024
6.23 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes results and reports from the injection/production test for wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in August, 2024 at Utah FORGE. Materials include injection, post stimulation production, flow rate, gamma, temperature and pressure survey results. For the respective ...
Authors
Kolomytsev, L. and Chadwick, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeegsproductioninjectionsurveyprocessed datainjection reportsproduction reportsinjection profileproduction profile16a78-3216b78-32production logwell log datainterpretationswell log interpretationsreportsslblogging

Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Cuttings X-Ray Diffraction Data

Apr 20, 2025
17.99 kB
Publicly accessible
X-ray diffraction (XRD) results from cuttings samples collected during drilling of Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32. The dataset includes XRD data for 77 samples taken between 3,120 and 10,977 feet measured depth (from the Kelly Bushing, 31 feet above ground level), with sampling interv...
Authors
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgewell 16bwell 16b78-32xrdx-rayx-ray diffractionmineralogymineralspetrographywell cuttings analysismineral abundancetrace mineralsweight percentsubsurface geologygeologyrock cuttingsmeasured depthkelly bushingprocessed dataegs

Utah FORGE: Stress Logging Data

Mar 14, 2018
814.17 kB
Publicly accessible
This spreadsheet consist of data and graphs from deep well 58-32 stress testing from 6900 7500 ft depth. Measured stress data were used to correct logging predictions of in situ stress. Stress plots shows pore pressure (measured during the injection testing), the total vertical in...
Authors
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergywell 58-32stress58-32 stressstress test58-32 stress data58-32 stress testutah forgeutahroosevelt hot springsutyoungs moduluspoisson ratiodynamicpressurepore pressuresh maxverticalhorizontalstress loglogginglogdataforgeegsrock propertiesrock propsgeomechanicswell datain situ stressresourcecharacterizationmilfordstress plot

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation DFN Fracture Plane Evaluation and Data

Oct 27, 2022
1.63 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes files used to fit planar fractures through the preliminary earthquake catalogs of the three stages of the April 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation which is linked bellow. These planar features have been used to update the FORGE reference Discrete Fracture Netwo...
Authors
Finnila, A. WSP Golder
geothermalenergydfnutah forgestimulationwell stimulationfracingfrackingdiscrete fracture networkwell fracturerock fractureswell fractureswell 16a78-32utah forge wellswell 16a78-32 stimulationexcelcsvpdfegsmodelingcharacterizationforge

Utah FORGE: Phase-Picking Based Microseismic Event Catalog April 2024 Stimulation

Feb 19, 2026
1.73 MB
Publicly accessible
This catalog contains microseismic event locations recorded during the April 2024 stimulation at the Utah FORGE site. Events were detected and located using a phase-picking workflow that integrates downhole geophones (wells 56 and 78B) and downhole DAS (well 16B). P and S-wave arr...
Authors
Zhu, W. et al University Of Utah
geothermalenergyapril 2024 stimulationforgeutahmicroseismic event locationsutah forgeuniversity of utahseismicaimachine learningdata-driven decisionscommunity safteyinfrastructure protectionproactive risk mitigationimproved safteyimmediate responsestimulationfracingground motionseismic hazardsegsevent catalogmlprocessed datareservoir characterizationhydraulic fracturinggeomechanicsgeophysics

Utah FORGE: Drilling Data for Student Competition

Dec 07, 2018
604.64 MB
Publicly accessible
Diagnostic drilling data (Pason log files) from Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1), which was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site. This dataset includes both ...
Authors
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergyforgeutahstudent competitiondrillingpason58-32egsroosevelt hot springsmilfordlogssubsurfaceperformancerigbitsmaterialsdownscaledmu-esw1roppump pressurewobweight on bitrate of penetrationtemperaturedepthtdtorqueflowwelllogdatadrillphase 2bresourcecharacterizationdrilling datawell datautah forgeraw dataprocessed data

Utah FORGE: Microseismic Event Catalogues from the Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation in April, 2022

Oct 10, 2023
Size unavailable
Publicly accessible
This dataset includes three microseismic event catalogues from the three stages of stimulation in April 2022 of well 16A(78)-32 derived by Geo Energie Suisse. Each spreadsheet contains source times, xy location, depth, and seismic moment magnitude. An animation of the order in whi...
Authors
Karvounis, D. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
geothermalenergymicroseismicmicroseismic eventmicroseismic event catalogmicroseismicityutah forgeutah seismicutah forge microseismic eventgeo energie suissethe international seismological centrewell stimulationwell 16a78-32 stimulationwell 16b78-32 stimulationegsfracing

Utah FORGE 3-2417: DAS Microseismic Event Catalog from the 16A/16B Circulation Test, 2023

Jun 12, 2024
2.41 MB
Publicly accessible
This preliminary data archive includes the relocated microseismic event catalog, 1D velocity model, and methods report from DAS acquisition conducted during the Well 16A and 16B circulation test (July 19th and 20th, 2023) at Utah FORGE. The methods report describes all processing ...
Authors
Vera Rodriguez, I. et al Rice University
geothermalenergyforgeutah forgeegsenhanced geothermaldasdistributed acoustic sensingmicroseismicevent catalogevent detectionfogmoreinversiongeophysicsreal-time16a16bcirculation testconnectivitymethodsrelocationhierarchical clusteringprocessed data

Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions

Jun 19, 2023
2.3 MB
Publicly accessible
This report reviews the training of machine learning algorithms to laboratory triaxial ultrasonic velocity data for Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. Three machine learning (ML) predictive models were developed for the prediction of vertical and two orthogonally oriented horizontal str...
Authors
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
geothermalenergymachine learningin-situ stressstress characterizationutah forgegeophysicsseismictriaxialstress predictionartificial neural networkmodelfeed forward artificial neural network

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Closing the Loop Between In-situ Stress Complexity and EGS Fracture Complexity 2023 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 08, 2023
81.21 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Closing the Loop Between In-situ Stress Complexity and EGS Fracture Complexity project by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, presented by Dr. Matteo Cusini. The project's objective was to employ a combination of high-fidelity simulations and true...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Bunger, A. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyannual workshop2023utah forgeegshigh-fidelity simulationstru-triaxialblock fracturing testsin-situ stresshydraulic fracture patternsfracture nucleationfracture propagationmodelingin-situ stress characterizationphase-field modelfracture simulationnear wellborefield datanumerical model

Utah FORGE 3-2417: Fiber-Optic Geophysical Monitoring of Reservoir Evolution 2023 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 08, 2023
54.51 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Fiber-Optic Geophysical Monitoring of Reservoir Evolution at the Utah FORGE Milford Site project by Rice University, presented by Prof. Jonathan Ajo-Franklin. The project's objective was to develop an end-to-end fiber-optic sensing approach for EGS to...
Authors
Ajo-Franklin, J. et al Rice University
geothermalenergyannual workshop2023utah forgeegsdistributed fiber optic sensingdfosdasflowing fracturesfracture creationwell pairegs performancemechanically compliant fracturesend-to-endegs fracture model

Utah FORGE 4-2492: Design and Implementation of Innovative Stimulation Treatments to Maximize Energy Recovery 2023 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 08, 2023
194.2 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Design and Implementation of Innovative Stimulation Treatments to Maximize Energy Recovery Efficiency at the Utah FORGE Site project by The University of Texas at Austin, presented by Professor Mukul M. Sharma. The project's objectives were to place f...
Authors
Sharma, M. The University of Texas at Austin
geothermalenergyannual workshop2023utah forgeegsfracture conductivityfracture diagnosticsconnectivityfluid circulationuniform injection profileideal fracture characteristicsstimulationthief zonesflowrateinjection pressurefracture geometryoptimizationenergy recoveryefficiency

Utah FORGE: Triggered 3-Component Surface Nodal Seismic Waveforms from the April 2022 FOAL 1 Experiment

Jun 30, 2026
736.6 MB
Publicly accessible
This package contains triggered 3-component surface nodal seismic waveforms recorded during the FOAL 1 experiment, or FORGE Observation Array Linear #1, which occurred during the April 2022 hydraulic stimulation of well 16A(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE EGS site. This data was utilized...
Authors
Kim, J. et al Rice University
geothermalenergyegsutah forgeforgemicroseismichydraulic stimulationfoal 1forge observation array linear16a32-32april 2022microseismicityinduced seismicitypassive seismic monitoringsurface nodal array3-component seismic datasmartsolominiseedstationxmlevent catalogwell trajectoryfogmoregeophysicsseismic dataprocessed data
<< Previous567891011121314Next >>
Google Map
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR provides free access to data generated from projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Geothermal.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service