OpenEI: Energy Information
  • Geothermal Data Repository
  • My User
    • Sign Up
    • Login
 
  • Data
    • View All Submissions
    • Data Lakes
    • Data Standards
    • Submit Data
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Data Submission Best Practices
    • Data Submission Tutorial Videos
    • Contact GDR Help
  • About
  • Search

Search GDR Data

Showing results 1 - 25 of 130.
Show results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Filters Clear All Filters ×
Topic
Technologies
Demonstration Sites
Data Type
"phase 2"×
Utah FORGE, UT×

Utah FORGE: Phase 3A, Year 2, Annual Report

Jul 29, 2022
45.42 MB
Publicly accessible
This is the annual report for Utah FORGE Phase 3A, year two, which was published on July 28th, 2022. The report includes site infrastructure, site operations, seismic monitoring reports, FORGE modeling reports, and external research and design. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE...
Authors
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeannual reportutah forge phase 3a reportutah forge reportutah forge reportsreportphase reportutahforgemodelingsite infrastructuresite operationsoperationsegsresource developmenttechnology development

Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report

Dec 11, 2019
147.81 MB
Publicly accessible
This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices i...
Authors
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyforgeutah forgeutah forge phase 2c reportphase 2c topical reportutah forge phase 2cegsmoderate rate injection testsmicroseismicdistributed acoustic sensingdasseismic reflection surveygravity measurementsinsarstimulatednumerical reservoir modelsalluvium-granitoidinjection testingmilfordroosevelt hot springsoverviewresultslessonslearnedconclusionspermittingcharacterizationsitedata inventoryconceptualgeologicmodelgeophysicsseismicgravitygeologyfeasibilitytechnicalinjection testmicroseismicityremote sensingmodelingstimulation

Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations

Mar 26, 2019
171.52 MB
Publicly accessible
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area: An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Authors
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergywell 78-32utah forgeutah forge phase 2cseismic monitoring wellutahlithologic logsdaily drilling reportsdrilling reportdrilling photosegscuttings logutah geothermalwell 68-32phase 2cthermal gradienttemperature logsutah forge temerature gradientswell oh-3well oh-4well wow-4well locationswells58-3268-32oh-3oh-4wow-2wow-3well wow-3well wow-2borehole logginggeophysicsground watermilforddrillingdatawelllocationforgewell dataresourcecharacterizationroosevelt hot springswell locationlithologycuttingsraw datapost-processedprocessed datatemperatureseismic monitoringseismicgeospatial dataarcgisshapefile

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Report on Phase Field Modelling of Near-Wellbore Hydraulic Fracture Nucleation and Propagation

Dec 31, 2023
5.37 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a report that describes the modelling of fracture nucleation and propagation in the near-wellbore region to understand the relationship between in situ stress and fracture patterns. A novel phase field formulation is described here, which represents fractures as a diffuse ...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgephase fieldegsmodeltechnical reportfracture nucleationfracture propagationnear-wellborephase field modelnumerical modelgeosfracturingnumerical resultsin situ stress

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Connecting In Situ Stress and Wellbore Deviation to Near-Well Fracture Complexity using Phase-Field Simulations

Jan 30, 2025
10.44 MB
Publicly accessible
This report presents a series of numerical experiments investigating the relationships among near-well fracture complexity, in situ stress conditions, and wellbore deviation. Using a phase-field modeling approach, the study explores how factors such as stress regimes, wellbore ori...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Fei, F. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgephase fieldnumerical simulationnear wellbore fracture nucleationegsnear-wellfracture complexityin situ stresswellbore deviationphase-field modelingnumerical solutionsfracture nucleationgeos modelingstress regimesfracture propagationrock mechanicstechnical report

Utah FORGE: 2024 Annual Report on Activities and Advancements

Jan 27, 2025
19.87 MB
Publicly accessible
This 2024 annual report for Phase 3B Year 2 at Utah FORGE provides an in-depth account of activities and advancements made at the site. Key achievements include drilling and stimulating the production well 16B(78)-32, creating a geothermal reservoir, and achieving commercial-scale...
Authors
McLennan, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgephase 3byear 2yearly reportreportutah forge reportdrillingreservoir creationutah forge phase 3b report2024 annual reportegswell 16b78-32stimulationcirculationfiber optic monitoringdrilling technologiesseismic monitoringresearch and developmenttechnical reportannual report

Utah FORGE: Phase Native State FALCON Model Files

Jun 06, 2019
11.78 MB
Publicly accessible
The submission includes FALCON input file and mesh for the an initial pressure-temperature simulation, and a second set for pressure-temperature-displacement simulation. All simulations are steady state. Data and input for the FORGE Phase 2 native state model were compiled from hi...
Authors
Podgorney, R. Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergyfalconforgenative stateutahroosevelt hot springsmilfordegsenhanced geothermal systemengineered geothermal systemutah forgecodesimulationscprocessed datapreprocessed dataraw datageospatial data3-d modellinggeologytemperaturestresspressurecharacterizationmodeling3-d modelinglithologymesh fileinputslithologic contacts

Utah FORGE: Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates

Dec 07, 2020
16.48 kB
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injecti...
Authors
Hardwick, C. Utah Geological Survey
geothermalenergyutah forgeforgewell 56-32 locationwell 68-32 locationwell 78-32 locationutah forge phase 2gpsegsroosevelt hot springsmilfordgeospatial datagisshapefileutah geological surveywell dataphase 2cwell locationswell location

Utah FORGE: Area LiDAR Bare Earth DEM Mosaic

Aug 07, 2018
6.86 GB
Publicly accessible
This is a mosaic of 154 bare earth DEM panels (0.5 m resolution) acquired during Phase II of the Utah FORGE project. The DEM covers the western Mineral Mountains and adjoining basin including the Roosevelt Hot Springs area. The coordinates are in UTM Zone 12, NAD 83 and elevation ...
Authors
Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergylidarlidar demlidar bare earthroosevelt hot springsutah forgeforgedigital elevation modelfrontier observatory for research in geothermal energyutahutgeospatial databare earthmodelgeotiffremote sensingdemphase 2elevationegsmilfordprocessed datamineral mountains

Utah FORGE: Phase 1a Tensor Strainmeter Data for the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32

Sep 15, 2022
26.41 MB
Publicly accessible
Data from two Tensor Optical Fiber Strainmeters that were operational during Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the April, 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Each csv file contains data from each stimulation stage (stage1, stage2, stage3) for both Phase 1a strainmeter installations (FS01, f...
Authors
DeWolf, S. and Murdoch, L. Clemson University
geothermalenergystrainstrainmeterutah forgetensor strainwell 16a78-32 stimulationstimulationforgefiberopticalegs

Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Ground Water Level Monitoring Data

Sep 30, 2020
17.28 MB
Publicly accessible
Groundwater data around the Utah FORGE site has been collected to determine the piezometric levels and compositional variability. Field measurements in 2020 are designed to obtain and survey new groundwater wells that have been drilled on the distal periphery of the Utah FORGE pro...
Authors
Kirby, S. Utah Geological Survey
geothermalenergyground waterground water levelwater levelutah forgeforgewow-2wow-3well datatemperaturecorrectedwater elevationgroundwaterroosevelt hot springsmilfordegswater table depthmonitoring

Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Report on Predicting Far-Field Stresses Using Finite Element Modeling and Near-Wellbore Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32

Aug 30, 2024
973.4 kB
Publicly accessible
This report presents the far-field stress predictions at two locations along the vertical section of Utah FORGE Well 16A (78)-32 using a physics-based thermo-poro-mechanical model. Three principal stresses in far-field were obtained by solving an inverse problem based on the near-...
Authors
Lu, G. et al University of Pittsburgh
geothermalenergyutah forgein-situ stress estimationphysics-based modelingfinite element methodmachine learning modelthermo-poro-mechanical effectwell loggingvelocity-to-stress relationshipmachine learningfemreporttechnical report16a78-32mlegs2-2439v2principal stressstress predictionfar-fieldpre-cooling

Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Data

Apr 20, 2019
61.5 MB
Publicly accessible
Pressure, temperature, and flow data from open-hole, upper perforation, and lower perforation well stimulations gathered from various tools collected at well 58-32 during phase 2C.
Authors
Best, S. Geothermal Resource Group
geothermalenergyforgeutahegsmilfordroosevelt hot springspasonsurface instrumentsstimulationpressuretemperatureisolate pumpingflowbackspartek memory pt gaugememory tooldidrillgrggeothermal resource groupbridge plugbadgeropenhole stimulationdidrill survey servicesweatherford hdwell 58-32utah geothermalfracture flowreservoir stimulationhydraulic fracturingphase 2cratehydraulicflowraw dataopen-holeupper perforationlower perforationutah forge

Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Schlumberger FMI Logs DLIS and XML files

Nov 17, 2017
2.4 GB
Publicly accessible
This zipped data set includes Schlumberger FMI logs DLIS and XML files from Utah FORGE deep well 58-32. These include runs 1 (2226-7550 ft) and 2 (7440-7550 ft). Run 3 (7390-7527ft) was acquired during phase 2C.
Authors
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyforgeutah forgeroosevelt hot springsfmifmi logswell 58-32fmi xmlfmi dlis58-32 fmifullboreformationmicroimagerimagingmicroimagingboreholeloggingloggeophysicsdip set logsutah geothermal58-32welldeepdliswell logxmlutahmilfordegsresourcecharacterizationwell data

Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) FMI Log Fracture Results

Mar 06, 2021
4.55 kB
Publicly accessible
A Schlumberger Fullbore Formation Micro-Imager (FMI) log was run from 7390 feet to 7527 feet depth in well 58-32, originally known as well MU-ESW1. Well 58-32 was completed in 2017 as part of Utah FORGE Phase 2. It reached a depth of 7536 feet and recorded a bottom hole temperatur...
Authors
BLOCHOWICZ, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyschlumberger fmifmi logutah forgeutah geothermalwell 58-32mu-esw1well 58-32 logschlumbergerfullboreformation microimagerfmiwell loglogginglogsfractureegswell data

Utah FORGE: Phase 3A Year 1 Annual Report for 2020

Dec 28, 2020
23.88 MB
Publicly accessible
This is the Utah FORGE annual report for Phase 3A year 1, which was completed on December 28th, 2020. This report includes site infrastructure, site operations, seismic monitoring, a conceptual geological model, outreach, and communications for the Utah FORGE project during Phase ...
Authors
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeutah forge phase 3autah forge phase 3a annual reportannual reportreportreportsutah forge annual reportsphase reportutahforgeegsenhanced geothermal systemsresourceresource potential

Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report

Aug 09, 2023
15.64 MB
Publicly accessible
This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and pla...
Authors
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeseismic monitoringinfrastructuremodellingrdcommunicationsoutreachannual reportplansdatamtmagnetotelluricphase 3bmilfordegsstimulationtracerinjectiongeophysicsmicroseismicforge reportssite operationsresource developmenttechnology development

Utah FORGE: Data for 3-D Model Development Lithology, Temperature, Pressure, and Stress

Mar 17, 2020
25.73 MB
Publicly accessible
This submission comprises two downloadable .zip archives. Each archive contains spreadsheets with 3-D data and a .txt document describing the data. The Mesh Files .zip download contains data regarding the lithologic contacts of the granitoid and overlying sedimentary basin fill. T...
Authors
Podgorney, R. Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergyutah forgeforge3-d modellingearth modellithologic contactspressurestresslithologyutahtemperature datamodelingraw datapreprocessedegstemperature3dmilfordmesh filegranitoidbasin fillinitial conditionsnumericalmodelreservoirresourcecharacterizationroosevelt hot springs

Utah FORGE 2-2446: Closing the Loop Between In-situ Stress Complexity and EGS Fracture Complexity 2023 Annual Workshop Presentation

Sep 08, 2023
81.21 MB
Publicly accessible
This is a presentation on the Closing the Loop Between In-situ Stress Complexity and EGS Fracture Complexity project by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, presented by Dr. Matteo Cusini. The project's objective was to employ a combination of high-fidelity simulations and true...
Authors
Cusini, M. and Bunger, A. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
geothermalenergyannual workshop2023utah forgeegshigh-fidelity simulationstru-triaxialblock fracturing testsin-situ stresshydraulic fracture patternsfracture nucleationfracture propagationmodelingin-situ stress characterizationphase-field modelfracture simulationnear wellborefield datanumerical model

Utah FORGE: Earth Model Mesh Data for Selected Surfaces

Dec 07, 2018
20.83 MB
Publicly accessible
This submission contains a number of data files with vertices of meshed/interpolated surfaces used in the Phase 2B earth model. Examples include land surface (based on 10-meter DEM), the granitoid-basin fill contact, several faults, and also interpolated temperature isosurfaces f...
Authors
Podgorney, R. Idaho National Laboratory
geothermalenergystudent competitionearth modelforgeroosevelt hot springsutahdemdigital elevation modelgeospatial datacoordinateisosurfacefaultstructurestructuraldatalocationland surfacetemperatureopal moundnegro magegsmilfordenhanced geothermal systemutah forgemodelingmodellingmesh datagranitoidtoptopographygeologybasin fillresourcecharacterizationprocessed data

Utah FORGE: Microseismic Events

Jul 08, 2019
262.54 kB
Publicly accessible
This archive contains Excel spreadsheets containing microseismic events detected in the study area during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The Readme file included that describes the meaning of the abbreviations used as field headers in the spreadsheets. Additionally, there is a .dat (text) f...
Authors
Rutledge, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forgeutah forge phase 2cutahmicroseismic eventsegsfracturereservoirstimulationmicroseismicityseismicitystressmilfordinjectionfrature networkhypocentersspectralmicroearthquakesforgephase 2croosevelt hot springsprocessed data

Utah FORGE: Phase 3 InSAR Study Results

Sep 24, 2020
101.48 MB
Publicly accessible
Ground movement is evaluated through analysis of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) interferograms. Results indicate there has been no detectable ground movement at millimeter scale. The zipped file in this submission contains a report, maps, and results from the InS...
Authors
Feigl, K. and Batzli, S. Department of Geoscience University of Wisconsin-Madison
geothermalenergyinsarutah forgeutah geothermalsubsidencegeodesydeformationground deformationcrustal deformationmapmean rate of changematlabgeologybedrockcrustalremote sensingegsroosevelt hot springsmilfordinterferometric synthetic aperture radar

Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Microgravity Data

Oct 07, 2020
17.52 kB
Publicly accessible
A 4D microgravity survey began in early 2019 in order to benchmark surface and subsurface elevations prior to Phase 3 drilling and stimulation campaigns. Microgravity stations are collocated with GPS deformation benchmarks and use the same location survey data. Surveys are underta...
Authors
Hardwick, C. Utah Geological Survey
geothermalenergyutah forgeforge microgravitymicrogravityutah geothermalegsroosevelt hot springsmilfordgpsprocessed datageophysics

Utah FORGE: Earthquake Catalog

Mar 21, 2018
66.71 kB
Publicly accessible
This is the set of earthquake catalogs developed for the Utah FORGE project covering December of 2016 through March of 2018. These are discussed in the "Utah FORGE Phase 2B Final Topical Report," which can be found on GDR under id: 1038 (See link 'Final Topical Report' in resource...
Authors
Pankow, K. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forge seismicityseismicityearthquakeearthquakesgeospatial dataearthquake catalogsutah forge earthquake catalogsutahutah forgeutah forge 2broosevelt hot springsmilfordforgephase 2bmicroseismicitymonitoringseismicmicroseismicegsprocessed datareportcatalogresourcecharacterization

Utah FORGE: InSAR Data 2019

Jul 01, 2019
478.35 MB
Publicly accessible
This dataset contains Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data used for ground deformation monitoring during Phase 2C of the Utah FORGE project. The dataset includes measurements of the mean rate of range change and associated standard errors, provided in both CSV and...
Authors
Feigl, K. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
geothermalenergyutah forge phase 2cutah forgeinsarutahground deformation monitoringdigital elevation modelsynthetic aperture radarsarradarsynthetic aperturesatelliteinterferometricmilfordroosevelt hot springsphase 2cgeodeticsegsimagingremote sensingforgedeformationground deformationprocessed datageospatial data
12345Next >>
Google Map
  • About the GDR
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Disclaimers
  • Developer Services
  • The GDR provides free access to data generated from projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Geothermal.
  • Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 unless otherwise noted.

Privacy Policy Notification

This site uses cookies to store and share user preferences with other OpenEI sites, and uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous user information such as which pages are visited, for how often, and what searches or other webpages may have led users here. You can prevent Google Analytics from recognizing you on return visits to this site by disabling cookies on your browser or by installing a Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. By clicking "Accept" you agree this site can store cookies on your device and disclose information to OpenEI and Google Analytics in accordance with our privacy policy.

OpenEI Privacy Policy Google Analytics Terms of Service