Search GDR Data
Showing results 1 - 25 of 80.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Conference Paper and Data
The U.S. Department of Energy's (U.S. DOE) Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is a field laboratory that provides a unique opportunity to develop and test new technologies for characterizing, creating and sustaining Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in ...
Best, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Schlumberger FMI Logs DLIS and XML files
This zipped data set includes Schlumberger FMI logs DLIS and XML files from Utah FORGE deep well 58-32. These include runs 1 (2226-7550 ft) and 2 (7440-7550 ft). Run 3 (7390-7527ft) was acquired during phase 2C.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 17, 2017
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: 2022 Well Stimulation Seismicity Data Including SeGY Data
This is a link to the Utah FORGE seismic data distribution site hosted by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations. The data was collected from downhole geophone strings in wells 56-32, 58-32 and 78B-32 during the 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. This dataset, which was upd...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 14, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: High-Resolution DAS Microseismic Data from Well 78-32
This regards a high-resolution DAS microseismic dataset produced by Silixa from Utah FORGE Phase 2C seismic monitoring well 78-32 during stimulation testing of well 58-32. It is a very large dataset and as such it is currently not directly available on GDR. However, it is availabl...
Martin, T. and Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 20, 2019
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Borehole Sensors and Well Trajectories (April 2022)
This link leads to a webpage with spreadsheets containing seismic borehole sensor locations and well trajectories for wells 56-32, 58-32, 78-32, 78B-32. Each of the files at the provided link include meta data on relevant information.
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Dec 23, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Downhole Geophone Seismic Data (August 2022)
This is a link to downhole geophone data collected by Schlumberger. These data were collected in the Utah FORGE deep seismic monitoring wells 58-32 and 56-32. The format is a standard SEGY and the units are bits. To convert to acceleration (m/s2) multiply by 2.333 x 10-7. Use one ...
Pankow, K. and Schlumberger, S. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Aug 25, 2022
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Microseismic Monitoring Geophone Data from Well 78-32
This submission includes geophone data collected by Schlumberger from Utah FORGE Phase 2C seismic monitoring well 78-32 during stimulation testing of well 58-32. The data are hosted by the Center for High Performance Computing (CHPC) at the University of Utah, and a script for dow...
Pankow, K. University of Utah
Mar 18, 2020
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Video of Utah FORGE Drilling Planning for Production Well 16B(78)-32
This is a YouTube video containing the specifics of well planning for Utah FORGE 16B(78)-32. This well will be drilled as a doublet approximately 300 feet parallel to and above 16A(78)-32 and will be drilled between approximately April 15th and July 17th 2023.
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 03, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE Project 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Seismic Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Fracture Generation During EGS Resource Development Deviatoric MT, Fracture Network, and Final Report
This submission contains 167 deviatoric moment tensor (MT) solutions for the seismicity observed two years prior and three years post start of injection activities at The Geysers Prati 32 EGS Demonstration. Also included is a statistical representation of the properties of 751 fra...
Gritto, R. et al Array Information Technology
Sep 01, 2018
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Sentinel-1 Input Data for PSInSAR Analysis
Files used to perform the Persistent Scatterer InSAR analysis with SARPROZ. The data is sourced from ESAs Sentinel-1 project and covers Brady Hot Springs and Desert Peak geothermal areas. The original titles are included for the Sentinel-1 data. The naming guide is included as a l...
Moraga, J. Colorado School of Mines
Apr 29, 2021
73 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
73 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Hydroshear Simulation Lab Test 2, Additional Data Sheets
This file contains additional data for this test (hydroshear test 3.2). In this test a sample of granite with a pre-cut (man made fracture) is confined, heated and differential stress is applied. The max temperature in this this system development test is 95C. More test details ca...
Bauer, S. Sandia National Laboratories
Aug 01, 2014
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Hydroshear Simulation Lab Test 2
This data file is for test 2. In this test a sample of granite with a pre-cut (man made fracture) is confined, heated and differential stress is applied. The max temperature in this this system development test is 95C. More test details can be found on the spreadsheets--note that ...
Bauer, S. Sandia National Laboratories
Aug 01, 2014
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) Data
The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 1...
Finnila, A. and Podgorney, R. Golder Associates Inc.
Jun 24, 2020
66 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
66 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Newberry EGS Demonstration: Initial Project Report and Induced Seismicity Mitigation Plan, 2011
This is the first project report and induced seismicity mitigation plan for the Newberry Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Demonstration project. The primary objectives of this first phase were to obtain necessary permits and comply with all regulations, including NEPA, communica...
Cladouhos, T. et al AltaRock Energy
May 05, 2024
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Distributed Acoustic Sensing Experiment Data from Garner Valley, California
In September 2013, an experiment using Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) was conducted at Garner Valley, a test site of the University of California Santa Barbara (Lancelle et al., 2014). This submission includes all DAS data recorded during the experiment.
The sampling rate ...
Lancelle, C. University of Wisconsin
Sep 11, 2013
14 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
14 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WHOLESCALE: Seismic Survey Data from San Emidio Nevada 2021
This dataset includes raw and processed seismic data from the 2021 seismic survey at the San Emidio geothermal field in Nevada. In April and May 2021, 37 tri-axial short period seismographs were deployed in a 1.8km diameter cluster centered on 40.367278 N, 119.409019 W. The first...
Lord, N. et al University of Wisconsin-Madison
Apr 06, 2021
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Hawaii Play Fairway Analysis: Lanai Resistivity and Density 3D Inversion Models
To prepare for its third phase, the Hawaii Play Fairway project conducted groundwater sampling and analyses in ten locations in the Hawaiian islands, magnetotelluric (MT) and gravity surveys, as well as calculations of 3D subsurface stress due to the weight of the rock underlying ...
Lautze, N. et al University of Hawaii
Jun 01, 2020
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 1: In-situ observation of pre-, co and post-seismic shear slip preceding hydraulic fracturing
Understanding the initiation and arrest of earthquakes is one of the long-standing challenges of seismology. Here we report on direct observations of borehole displacement by a meter-sized shear rupture induced by pressurization of metamorphic rock at 1.5 km depth. We observed the...
Guglielmi, Y. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
May 22, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Drilling Data and Logs
This dataset consists of drilling data (Pason data spreadsheets, daily reports, days v. depth, mud logs), Schlumberger logs (FMI, shear anisotropy analysis, memory, sonic, array induction/spectral density/dual spaced neutron/gamma ray/caliper, spectral GR/temperature, and Gardner ...
Bristol, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 19, 2021
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE DAS Seismic Data 2022
This is a link to the website where DAS seismic data, collected from wells 78-32 and 78B-32 during the Utah FORGE 2022 stimulation, is now available for download. The data can be accessed at "Well 16A78-32 2022 Stimulation Seismicity Data" link in the submission under the Silixa h...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Pressure-Temperature Logs March April 2024
This dataset consists of Baker Hughes Pressure-Temperature gauge readings on fiber optics in Utah FORGE Well 16B(78)-32. This gauge is at a measured depth of 7,056.67 feet. The true vertical depth can be determined from the well survey data, which is linked below. The data consis...
McLennan, J. and Hughes, B. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 20, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Microseismic Event Catalogues from the Well 16A(78)-32 Stimulation in April, 2022
This dataset includes three microseismic event catalogues from the three stages of stimulation in April 2022 of well 16A(78)-32 derived by Geo Energie Suisse. Each spreadsheet contains source times, xy location, depth, and seismic moment magnitude. An animation of the order in whi...
Karvounis, D. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Oct 10, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated FMI Fracture Log from Well 16A(78)-32
This dataset consists of an Excel spreadsheet detailing the fracture picks from a reinterpretation of the formation micro-imaging (FMI) log from Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. The provided information details fracture location, geometry, and type. Also included here is a link to the...
Handwerger, D. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 17, 2024
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Phase 1a Tensor Strainmeter Data for the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
Data from two Tensor Optical Fiber Strainmeters that were operational during Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the April, 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Each csv file contains data from each stimulation stage (stage1, stage2, stage3) for both Phase 1a strainmeter installations (FS01, f...
DeWolf, S. and Murdoch, L. Clemson University
Sep 15, 2022
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
8 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible