Search GDR Data
Showing results 26 - 38 of 38.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Drilling Data and Logs
This dataset consists of drilling data (Pason data spreadsheets, daily reports, days v. depth, mud logs), Schlumberger logs (FMI, shear anisotropy analysis, memory, sonic, array induction/spectral density/dual spaced neutron/gamma ray/caliper, spectral GR/temperature, and Gardner ...
Bristol, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 19, 2021
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab: Modeling and Simulation Working Group Teleconference Series (129-130)
This submission contains the presentation slides and recordings from EGS Collab Modeling and Simulation Working Group (MSWG) teleconferences number 129 through 130. These teleconferences served three objectives for the project: 1) share simulation results, 2) communicate field act...
White, M. et al Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jun 22, 2022
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well Data for Student Competition
Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1) was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site.
Well Accord-1 was drilled decades ago for geothermal exploration purposes. While ...
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2-2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress at the U.S DOE FORGE EGS Site: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement project by Battelle [Columbus, OH], presented by Mark Kelley. The project's objective was to characterize stress in the U...
Kelley, M. and Bunger, A. Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 08, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: 2019 ARMA Overview Slide Presentation
This is an overview presentation of the Utah FORGE project given by Joseph Moore, Ph.D., at the 2019 American Rock Mechanics Associate meeting. It details the state of the Utah FORGE project at on 8/17/2019.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 17, 2019
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32: Summary of Drilling Activities
This is a 74 page detailed summary of the drilling activities of Utah FORGE 16A(78)-32, a highly deviated well completed on February 2nd, 2021, as part of the Utah FORGE project. This well was deviated at 65 degrees from vertical after reaching 6000 feet in depth had a total measu...
Winkler, D. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 20, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Rock Properties
This is an Excel spreadsheet that contains rock properties from several wells in the Utah FORGE study area. This includes a map of the wells. Data is described in the Final Topical Report included in the resources below.
Gwynn, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions
This report reviews the training of machine learning algorithms to laboratory triaxial ultrasonic velocity data for Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. Three machine learning (ML) predictive models were developed for the prediction of vertical and two orthogonally oriented horizontal str...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jun 19, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Core Data
These datasets, images, and graphics were derived from core drilling and core that was extracted from Utah Forge deep well 58-32 (originally called MU-ESW1), near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Drilling Data
This dataset includes survey data, drilling data, daily reports, summaries of daily operations, and rig photos from the drilling of Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32, which is a highly deviated deep well. It was completed 60 days ahead of schedule.
Rig move in began 10/22/2020 and dril...
McLennan, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jan 08, 2021
15 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
15 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Data
Pressure, temperature, and flow data from open-hole, upper perforation, and lower perforation well stimulations gathered from various tools collected at well 58-32 during phase 2C.
Best, S. Geothermal Resource Group
Apr 20, 2019
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
16 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible