Search GDR Data
Showing results 26 - 50 of 229.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Phase Native State FALCON Model Files
The submission includes FALCON input file and mesh for the an initial pressure-temperature simulation, and a second set for pressure-temperature-displacement simulation. All simulations are steady state. Data and input for the FORGE Phase 2 native state model were compiled from hi...
Podgorney, R. Idaho National Laboratory
Jun 06, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2024 Stimulations Microseismic Event Catalog from Seismic Surface Network
This is a link to the microseismic catalog of the 2024 stimulations at Utah FORGE is based on the surface monitoring network consisting of 5 permanent seismic stations deployed by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations and a temporary deployment of 144 nodal geophones.
The ...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jul 29, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
Utah FORGE: Seismic and Other Shapefiles from the Roosevelt Hot Springs Area
Three shapefiles in this submission show the position of proposed seismic line surveys. The mid-crustal velocity anomaly file shows the extent of an anomalously low P-wave velocity zone in the subsurface. Two other files show the extent of known hydrothermal systems in the Rooseve...
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 22, 2016
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well Data for Student Competition
Well 58-32 (previously labeled MU-ESW1) was drilled near Milford Utah during Phase 2B of the FORGE Project to confirm geothermal reservoir characteristics met requirements for the final FORGE site.
Well Accord-1 was drilled decades ago for geothermal exploration purposes. While ...
Podgorney, R. et al Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Fault Reactivation Through Fluid Injection Induced Seismicity Laboratory Experiments
Included are results from shear reactivation experiments on laboratory faults pre-loaded close to failure and reactivated by the injection of fluid into the fault. The sample comprises a single-inclined-fracture (SIF) transecting a cylindrical sample of Westerly granite.
All expe...
Yu, J. et al Pennsylvania State University
Jul 01, 2023
27 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
27 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: InSAR Data Best Pairs
This submission provides Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data covering the Utah FORGE site via the TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X satellite missions operated by the German Space Agency (DLR). Data was collected between 2019/01/01 and 2023/06/30. Interferometric pairs (...
Batzli, S. and Feigl, K. University of Wisconsin Madison
May 31, 2023
11 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
11 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report
This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and pla...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Aug 09, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Seismic Event Catalogue from the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
This dataset includes earthquake catalogues for the three stages of the 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation provided by Geo Energie Suisse. Events in these catalogues have been visually inspected. There are additional events of lower signal to noise that were automatically detected. ...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jul 30, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Temperature Contours
This submission contains several ArcGIS shapefiles, each with Temperature contour lines at different depths. Subsurface temperature were important for characterizing the geothermal system beneath the FORGE site in Milford, Utah.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 09, 2016
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 3A, Year 2, Annual Report
This is the annual report for Utah FORGE Phase 3A, year two, which was published on July 28th, 2022. The report includes site infrastructure, site operations, seismic monitoring reports, FORGE modeling reports, and external research and design. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Microseismic Surface Network Catalogs for Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation 2022 and Circulation 2023
This dataset includes microseismic surface network catalogs for Utah FORGE. Data were recorded during the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32 in 2022 and the circulation tests between wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in 2023. Near-surface seismic monitoring during circulation experimen...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Feb 09, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Seismic Event Catalogue from the April, 2022 Stimulation of Well 16A(78)-32
These are revised catalogs, related to the April, 2022 well 16A(78)-32 stimulation (phases 1,2, & 3), provided by Geo Energie Suisse (GES) that include additional events at the start of Stage 1 and some tidying up of some locations. These catalogs also include events for additiona...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Nov 09, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Core Analysis Results
This dataset features petrographic, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Scanning Electron Microscopy Analyses of core samples from well 16A(78)-32, which serves as the injection well for the Utah FORGE Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) project. In addition to an overview of the analysis,...
Jones, C. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 22, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 5-2557: Trixial Shear and Wellbore Breakout Tests Report and Data
Included are a report and data from triaxial shear tests on simulated Sierra White fault gouge and a borehole stimulation experiment. This serves as a progress report for the Role of Fluid and Temperature in Fracture Mechanics and Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) P...
Choens, C. and Yoon, H. Sandia National Laboratories
Apr 19, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Fiber Optics Monitoring Reports
Included here are two fiber optics monitoring reports on Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32 from Neubrex Energy Services. These reports review the fiber optics monitoring during both the cementing and circulation test periods of the well. Cementing as well as post-cementing monitoring a...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Oct 21, 2023
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions
This report reviews the training of machine learning algorithms to laboratory triaxial ultrasonic velocity data for Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. Three machine learning (ML) predictive models were developed for the prediction of vertical and two orthogonally oriented horizontal str...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jun 19, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Earth Model Mesh Data for Selected Surfaces
This submission contains a number of data files with vertices of meshed/interpolated surfaces used in the Phase 2B earth model. Examples include land surface (based on 10-meter DEM), the granitoid-basin fill contact, several faults, and also interpolated temperature isosurfaces f...
Podgorney, R. Idaho National Laboratory
Dec 07, 2018
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: GIS Well Temperature Data
This is a GIS point feature shapefile representing wells, and their temperatures, that are located in the general Utah FORGE area near Milford, Utah. There are also fields that represent interpolated temperature values at depths of 200 m, 1000 m, 2000 m, 3000 m, and 4000 m. in deg...
Gwynn, M. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 28, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Stage 1 Pressure Falloff Analysis
This is an analysis of the pressure falloff in stage 1 fracture stimulation of FORGE well 16A(78)-32. The objective of this research is to understand the information content of the well stimulation data of FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. The Stage 1 step-rate test, a variant of the classic...
Kazemi, H. et al Colorado School of Mines
Aug 04, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Sanvean Technologies Drilling Data from Well 16B(78)-32
Included here is Sanvean Technologies bit sensor data amalgamated with data from National Oilwell Varco's (NOV) BlackBox tool for Reed Hycalog bits used during drilling of Well 16B(78)-32. The dataset contains information collected at the bit while drilling including rate of penet...
Barker, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 26, 2023
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress
Core-based in-situ stress estimation, Triaxial Ultrasonic Velocity (labTUV) data, and Deformation Rate Analysis (DRA) data for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 using triaxial ultrasonic velocity and deformation rate analysis. Report documenting a multi-component approach to characterizi...
Bunger, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Dec 13, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Well 16B(78)-32 Field-Test Data from Mini-Frac Tests
This submittal includes the field-test data collected during stress tests conducted in the Utah FORGE 16B(78)-32 wellbore to measure/characterize the stresses in the geothermal reservoir. The type of stress test performed is referred to as a mini-frac test or a micro-frac test. Th...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jul 02, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Evaluation of Potential Geochemical Responses to Injection in the FORGE Geothermal Reservoir
Plugging of fracture porosity from mineral precipitation due to injecting cold water into a a geothermal reservoir can impact the overall permeability of the fracture network in the reservoir. This can have serious ramifications on the efficiency of the geothermal resource. Geoche...
Patil, V. and Simmons, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 03, 2019
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Targeting Geothermal Resources with Geodetic Strain Data Paper
The paper linked below offers an initial assessment of a new method to target potential geothermal resources on the regional scale. The method is based on seeking relationships between geologic structures and geodetic observations of regional tectonic strain.
Blewitt, G. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 01, 2004
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2020-2021 Geothermal Energy/EGS Survey and Results
The Utah FORGE project collaborated with the University of Utahs Department of Communication on a Capstone course during Fall Semester 2020. The course created a survey to gauge the general populations knowledge of geothermal energy and Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). The surve...
Yeo, S. and McKasy, M. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 20, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated