Search GDR Data
Showing results 76 - 100 of 168.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE: Downhole Geophone Seismic Data (August 2022)
This is a link to downhole geophone data collected by Schlumberger. These data were collected in the Utah FORGE deep seismic monitoring wells 58-32 and 56-32. The format is a standard SEGY and the units are bits. To convert to acceleration (m/s2) multiply by 2.333 x 10-7. Use one ...
Pankow, K. and Schlumberger, S. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Aug 25, 2022
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Extended Circulation Test Data August and September 2024
The dataset includes data collected during an extended circulation test conducted at the Utah FORGE site between August 8 and September 5, 2024. It provides uncorrected, raw digital data from the test, along with calibration information and a final report detailing the test proced...
McLennan, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 11, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Conference Paper and Data
The U.S. Department of Energy's (U.S. DOE) Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is a field laboratory that provides a unique opportunity to develop and test new technologies for characterizing, creating and sustaining Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in ...
Best, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Powder X-ray Diffraction Data from Well 16A(78)-32 Core
This dataset from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) consists of four raw X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans and preliminary results of quantitative XRD analysis. The scanned samples were prepared from four subcores, which came from various depths of the FORGE well 16A(78)-3...
Kroll, K. et al Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jul 27, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 DAS Data April, 2024
This dataset comprises Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) data collected from the Utah FORGE monitoring well 16B(78)-32 (the producer well) during hydraulic fracture stimulation operations conducted in April 2024. The data were acquired continuously over the stimulation period at ...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Oct 01, 2024
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Neubrex Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation and Circulation Fiber Optics Reports Summer, 2024
This zip file contains reports discussing the use of fiber optics during well 16B(78)-32 stimulation and circulation tests in the summer of 2024. The reports cover the collection of strain rate and temperature change data during these well events. Theory, methods, and initial dat...
Jurick, D. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Sep 25, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress
Core-based in-situ stress estimation, Triaxial Ultrasonic Velocity (labTUV) data, and Deformation Rate Analysis (DRA) data for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 using triaxial ultrasonic velocity and deformation rate analysis. Report documenting a multi-component approach to characterizi...
Bunger, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Dec 13, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Seismic Stations and Wells GPS Survey Data, 2021
This is a CSV spreadsheet containing UTM and Latitude and Longitude coordinates and elevations for Wells 78-32, 58-32, and 16A(78)-32 and BOR1, BOR2, BOR3, FOR2, FOR5, FORK, FORU, and FORW seismic stations. These are from a GPS survey conducted by the Utah Geological Survey in Jun...
Erickson, B. Utah Geological Survey
Jun 30, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Evaluation of Potential Geochemical Responses to Injection in the FORGE Geothermal Reservoir
Plugging of fracture porosity from mineral precipitation due to injecting cold water into a a geothermal reservoir can impact the overall permeability of the fracture network in the reservoir. This can have serious ramifications on the efficiency of the geothermal resource. Geoche...
Patil, V. and Simmons, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 03, 2019
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Circulation Test Daily Reports from August 2024
These are the daily reports created during and around the August 2024 circulation test done on wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site. Information about the rig activity during this period includes details on rig up, depths, pumping, water temperature, safety, and ...
Swearingen, L. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 04, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Distributed Temperature Sensing Data from April and May 2024
This dataset includes Neubrex Energy Services fiber optic distributed temperature sensing (DTS) data from well 16B(78)-32 during stimulation and circulation, including interaction with well 16A(78)-32, during April and May 2024. The DTS data are stored in HDF5 file format and are ...
Jurick, D. and Guzik, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 08, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2417: Well 16B(78)-32 Fiber-Optic Cable Installation Report
This is an installation report detailing placement of the integrated fiber-optic cable behind casing in Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32. These activities occurred in July of 2023 immediately after the drilling of 16B. This report was prepared by the FOGMORE R&D project (Fiber Optic MOn...
Ajo-Franklin, J. et al Rice University
May 15, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Building a 3D Resistivity Model for Simulation and Survey Design of EM Measurements
The included report outlines the creation of three 3D resistivity models that will be used to determine the sensitivity of EM measurements for the hypothetical stimulated reservoir at FORGE as well as for EM survey design. FORGE project 3-2535 is planning on using a casing source ...
Alumbaugh, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Dec 01, 2022
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Regional Well Locations
This archive contains a GIS point feature shapefile that shows the locations of wells in the general region of the Utah FORGE project, near Roosevelt Hot Springs. This includes Utah FORGE deep well 58-32 and wells for which data has been uploaded to the Geothermal Data Repository....
Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 22, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Telluric Monitoring Experiment Transfer Functions
The Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) attempted a stimulation at well 16A(78)-32 during April and May 2022. We recorded telluric and magnetotelluric (MT) data before, during, and after the well stimulation experiment using the FORGE Telluric Monit...
Mendoza, K. and Wannamaker, P. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
May 27, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018
This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic survey...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 07, 2018
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Discrete Fracture Network and Fracture Propagation Modelling
Design and Implementation of Innovative Stimulation Treatments to Maximize Energy Recovery Efficiency at the Utah Forge Site
Sharma, M. and Cao, M. University of Texas
Feb 07, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Development of a Reservoir Seismic Velocity Model and Seismic Resolution Study
This is data from and a final report on the development of a 3D velocity model for the larger FORGE area and on the seismic resolution in the stimulated fracture volume at the bottom of well 16A-32. The velocity model was developed using RMS velocities of the seismic reflection su...
Vasco, D. and Chan, C. Array Information Technology
Apr 30, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Seismograph Station Information and Data
This link leads to the University of Utah Seismograph Stations website Utah FORGE seismograph stations page. This page contains a location map and description of the Utah FORGE seismograph stations and other related information. Additionally, data can be downloaded for each statio...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jan 26, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: 2024 Stimulations Microseismic Event Catalog from Seismic Surface Network
This is a link to the microseismic catalog of the 2024 stimulations at Utah FORGE is based on the surface monitoring network consisting of 5 permanent seismic stations deployed by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations and a temporary deployment of 144 nodal geophones.
The ...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jul 29, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
Utah FORGE: Fiber Optic Cumulative Strain Change and Strain Change Rate Data From Well 16A Stimulation at Well 16B
This dataset includes Rayleigh Frequency Shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) cumulative strain change and change rate data. The data was acquired during the stimulation of Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32 in April 2024 via fiber installed in Well 16B(78)-32. The fiber optic da...
Khatara, S. et al Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC
Nov 06, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Hydraulic Fracture Width Determination Using Stoneley Wave Pressure Testing and Electrical Borehole Scans
This report provides insights into Utah FORGE well 58-32's hydraulic fractures. It utilizes both electrical borehole scans from Schlumberger's Formation Micro-scanner Image tool (FMI) and Stoneley waves from a borehole sonic tool. These methods are combined in a comprehensive work...
Hornby, B. Hornby Geophysical Services, LLC
Oct 06, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Report on Minifrac Tests for Stress Characterization
This report describes minifrac tests conducted in the 16B(78)-32 well at the Utah FORGE site to characterize subsurface stresses, including the magnitude and orientation of the minimum and maximum horizontal stresses and the magnitude of the vertical stress. A minifrac test was co...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Feb 22, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Well 16B(78)-32 Field-Test Data from Mini-Frac Tests
This submittal includes the field-test data collected during stress tests conducted in the Utah FORGE 16B(78)-32 wellbore to measure/characterize the stresses in the geothermal reservoir. The type of stress test performed is referred to as a mini-frac test or a micro-frac test. Th...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jul 02, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated