Search GDR Data
Showing results 1 - 25 of 35.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Utah FORGE 6-3712: Probabilistic Estimation of Seismic Response Using Physics-Informed Recurrent Neural Networks 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Probabilistic Estimation of Seismic Response Using Physics-Informed Recurrent Neural Networks by GTC Analytics, presented by Jesse Williams. This video slide presentation discusses the development of machine learning-based predictive tools to estimate...
Williams, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 17, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Preliminary Report on Development of a Reservoir Seismic Velocity Model
This report describes the development of a preliminary 3D seismic velocity model at the Utah FORGE site and first results from estimating seismic resolution in the generated fracture volume during Stage 3 of the April 2022 stimulation.
A preliminary 3D velocity model for the larg...
Gritto, R. Array Information Technology
Jan 30, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Report on Predicting Far-Field Stresses Using Finite Element Modeling and Near-Wellbore Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32
This report presents the far-field stress predictions at two locations along the vertical section of Utah FORGE Well 16A (78)-32 using a physics-based thermo-poro-mechanical model. Three principal stresses in far-field were obtained by solving an inverse problem based on the near-...
Lu, G. et al University of Pittsburgh
Aug 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions
This report reviews the training of machine learning algorithms to laboratory triaxial ultrasonic velocity data for Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. Three machine learning (ML) predictive models were developed for the prediction of vertical and two orthogonally oriented horizontal str...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jun 19, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 6-3629: Application of Machine Learning, Geomechanics, and Seismology for Real-Time Decision Making Tools During Stimulation 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Cutting Edge Application of Machine Learning, Geomechanics, and Seismology for Real-Time Decision Making Tools During Stimulation by the University of Utah, presented by No'am Zach Dvory. This video slide presentation, by the University of Utah, disc...
Dvory, N. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 15, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions September 2023 Report
This task completion report documents the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of in-situ vertical (Sv), minimum horizontal (SHmin) and maximum horizontal (SHmax) stresses in well 16A(78)-32. The detailed description of the experimental...
Mustafa, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 28, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Characterizing In-Situ Stress with Laboratory Modelling and Field Measurements 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress at the Utah FORGE Site: Laboratory Modelling and Field Measurements project by The University of Pittsburgh, presented by Andrew Bunger. The project characterizes the stress in the Utah FORGE EGS...
Bunger, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 04, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Optimization of a Plug-and-Perf Stimulation (Fervo Energy)
Information around the plug-and-perf treatment design at Utah FORGE by Fervo Energy.
Objective and Purpose:
Develop a multistage hydraulic stimulation approach designed specifically to target the top three factors that control the technical and commercial viability of an EGS sys...
Norbeck, J. et al Fervo Energy
Feb 08, 2023
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2-2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress at the U.S DOE FORGE EGS Site: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement project by Battelle [Columbus, OH], presented by Mark Kelley. The project's objective was to characterize stress in the U...
Kelley, M. and Bunger, A. Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 08, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 5-2557: Fluid and Temperature in Fracture Mechanics and Coupled THMC Processes Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on the Role of Fluid and Temperature in Fracture Mechanics and Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) Processes for Enhanced Geothermal Systems project by Purdue University, presented by Distinguished Professor of Physics & Astronomy, Laura J. Pyrak...
Pyrak-Nolte, L. Purdue University
Sep 08, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Deep Wells Temperature Surveys as of September 2022
This Excel spreadsheet contains temperature survey results for Utah FORGE wells 58-32, 78-32, 56-32, 16A(78)-32 and 78B-32. It also contains charts and comparisons, along with a "Data Summary" which provides links to previous GDR submissions with temperature data for each well.
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 16, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Downhole Geophone Seismic Data (August 2022)
This is a link to downhole geophone data collected by Schlumberger. These data were collected in the Utah FORGE deep seismic monitoring wells 58-32 and 56-32. The format is a standard SEGY and the units are bits. To convert to acceleration (m/s2) multiply by 2.333 x 10-7. Use one ...
Pankow, K. and Schlumberger, S. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Aug 25, 2022
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Core Data
These datasets, images, and graphics were derived from core drilling and core that was extracted from Utah Forge deep well 58-32 (originally called MU-ESW1), near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Deep Wells Water and Gas Sampling with Analyses by ThermoChem (October, 2022)
This data includes a document that describes the effort to collect and analyze water and gas samples from deep Utah FORGE wells 16A(78)-32, 58-32, 56-32 and 78B-32 along with additional pdf files showing ThermoChem's analyses attached as an appendix.
Joness, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 26, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Milford Deep Test Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Pressure and Temperature Logs
This archive consists of a pdf graphic log and a LAS text file representing the results of the pressure and temperature logs measured on Nov. 8th, 2018 from the Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1). The logs were taken by DI Drill Survey Services.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 08, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Seismic and Other Shapefiles from the Roosevelt Hot Springs Area
Three shapefiles in this submission show the position of proposed seismic line surveys. The mid-crustal velocity anomaly file shows the extent of an anomalously low P-wave velocity zone in the subsurface. Two other files show the extent of known hydrothermal systems in the Rooseve...
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 22, 2016
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
7 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Logs and Data from Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1)
Data, logs, and graphics associated with the drilling and testing of Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: 58-32 Injection and Packer Performance, April and May 2019
This is a PDF format summary report regarding the performance of a packer, which failed, and bridge plug used during the injection program in Utah FORGE deep Well 58-32, April and May, 2019.
McLennan, J. and Podgorney, R. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 22, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Schlumberger FMI Logs DLIS and XML files
This zipped data set includes Schlumberger FMI logs DLIS and XML files from Utah FORGE deep well 58-32. These include runs 1 (2226-7550 ft) and 2 (7440-7550 ft). Run 3 (7390-7527ft) was acquired during phase 2C.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Nov 17, 2017
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Planned Trajectory
This submission includes an Excel spreadsheet containing the Utah FORGE deep well 16A(78)-32 planned trajectory including UTM coordinates, elevations, and depths from the well head to the toe. This proposed new injection well is expected to descend vertically to a depth of approxi...
Podgorney, R. and Nash, G. Idaho National Laboratory
Mar 24, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 X-ray Diffraction Data
This submission contains x-ray diffraction data taken from 3,600 to 10,987 feet deep in well 16A(78)-32 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs Geothermal Area as part of the Utah FORGE project. 78 rock samples were taken. Samples are taken in a range of ten feet at 100 foot increments. Mine...
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 29, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Regional Well Locations
This archive contains a GIS point feature shapefile that shows the locations of wells in the general region of the Utah FORGE project, near Roosevelt Hot Springs. This includes Utah FORGE deep well 58-32 and wells for which data has been uploaded to the Geothermal Data Repository....
Nash, G. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 22, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Stress Logging Data
This spreadsheet consist of data and graphs from deep well 58-32 stress testing from 6900 7500 ft depth. Measured stress data were used to correct logging predictions of in situ stress. Stress plots shows pore pressure (measured during the injection testing), the total vertical in...
McLennan, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 14, 2018
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2-2404: Determination of Reservoir-Scale Stress State Presentation Slides
This PowerPoint summarizes the integration of multiple approaches and data to constrain wellbore stress models at Utah FORGE. This stress determination used faulting theory, breakouts, and drilling-induced cracks detected in image logs. Wellbore stress profiles were established f...
Ghassemi, A. et al The University of Oklahoma
Jul 31, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible