Search GDR Data
Showing results 1 - 25 of 80.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Technologies
Featured Projects
Topics
Data Type
Cape EGS: Frisco Pad Wells Flow Test Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco pad flow test project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between July 17th Aug 12th 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed Acoustic...
Dadi, S. and Kanu, O. Fervo Energy
Nov 06, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: GES Well 16A(78)-32 and Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Seismic Event Catalogs
This dataset contains seismic event catalogs from the hydraulic stimulation of wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site in April 2024. The data was collected by Geo Energy Suisse (GES) using a variety of seismic monitoring technologies, including 3-component (3C) geo...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Cape EGS: Frisco 2-P Well Stimulation Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco 2-P well stimulation project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between June 1 and June 11, 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed ...
Dadi, S. and Titov, A. Fervo Energy
Sep 19, 2024
26 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
26 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2022 Well Stimulation Seismicity Data Including SeGY Data
This is a link to the Utah FORGE seismic data distribution site hosted by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations. The data was collected from downhole geophone strings in wells 56-32, 58-32 and 78B-32 during the 2022 stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. This dataset, which was upd...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 14, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Report on Borehole EM Data Collection and Imaging with the VEMP Field System
This report outlines electromagnetic field measurements that were made after stimulation at Utah FORGE in May of 2024. The measurements involved lowering an electrode to ~3500' in well 16A to energize the steel casing as part of the electric source, with the return electrode locat...
Alumbaugh, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sep 05, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Seismic Velocity Models, February 2021
This dataset contains a map, showing the Utah FORGE seismic stations, and seismic velocity model data. There are 61 1-D velocity models which are in a compressed TAR file. A paper is referenced at the end of this description which discusses the use of these data in 3D modelling. T...
Pankow, K. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Feb 28, 2021
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Seismic Activity from April, 2019
This dataset contains seismic event detections acquired using the 151 Nodal geophones deployed at the Utah FORGE site in April 2019. Details regarding the publishing are available in the paper linked below (Mesimeri, M. and K. L. Pankow et al. 2020). A frequency-domain-based algor...
Pankow, K. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
May 01, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Characterizing In-Situ Stress with Laboratory Modelling and Field Measurements 2024 Annual Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress at the Utah FORGE Site: Laboratory Modelling and Field Measurements project by The University of Pittsburgh, presented by Andrew Bunger. The project characterizes the stress in the Utah FORGE EGS...
Bunger, A. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 04, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: 2024 Stimulations Microseismic Event Catalog from Seismic Surface Network
This is a link to the microseismic catalog of the 2024 stimulations at Utah FORGE is based on the surface monitoring network consisting of 5 permanent seismic stations deployed by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations and a temporary deployment of 144 nodal geophones.
The ...
Niemz, P. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Jul 29, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
1 Resources
0 Stars
Awaiting curation
Utah FORGE 3-2535: Building a 3D Resistivity Model for Simulation and Survey Design of EM Measurements
The included report outlines the creation of three 3D resistivity models that will be used to determine the sensitivity of EM measurements for the hypothetical stimulated reservoir at FORGE as well as for EM survey design. FORGE project 3-2535 is planning on using a casing source ...
Alumbaugh, D. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Dec 01, 2022
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
5 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Borehole PSS Tools Status Report
This report summarizes the data quality from the Utah FORGE borehole passive seismic sensors (PSS) tools at well sites 58-32 and 78B-32. Two level Avalon tools were installed on 09-28-2022 and 09-29-2022 by representatives from Avalon, Schlumberger, University of Utah, and Instrum...
Stachnik, J. Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc.
Dec 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress
Core-based in-situ stress estimation, Triaxial Ultrasonic Velocity (labTUV) data, and Deformation Rate Analysis (DRA) data for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32 using triaxial ultrasonic velocity and deformation rate analysis. Report documenting a multi-component approach to characterizi...
Bunger, A. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Dec 13, 2022
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
4 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Downhole Geophone Seismic Data (August 2022)
This is a link to downhole geophone data collected by Schlumberger. These data were collected in the Utah FORGE deep seismic monitoring wells 58-32 and 56-32. The format is a standard SEGY and the units are bits. To convert to acceleration (m/s2) multiply by 2.333 x 10-7. Use one ...
Pankow, K. and Schlumberger, S. University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Aug 25, 2022
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
3 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 2-2439: A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement Workshop Presentation
This is a presentation on A Multi-Component Approach to Characterizing In-Situ Stress at the U.S DOE FORGE EGS Site: Laboratory, Modeling and Field Measurement project by Battelle [Columbus, OH], presented by Mark Kelley. The project's objective was to characterize stress in the U...
Kelley, M. and Bunger, A. Battelle Memorial Institute
Sep 08, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2439: Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32 Stress Predictions
This report reviews the training of machine learning algorithms to laboratory triaxial ultrasonic velocity data for Utah FORGE Well 16A(78)-32. Three machine learning (ML) predictive models were developed for the prediction of vertical and two orthogonally oriented horizontal str...
Kelley, M. et al Battelle Memorial Institute
Jun 19, 2023
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Conference Paper and Data
The U.S. Department of Energy's (U.S. DOE) Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is a field laboratory that provides a unique opportunity to develop and test new technologies for characterizing, creating and sustaining Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in ...
Best, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Ground Water Level Monitoring Data
Groundwater data around the Utah FORGE site has been collected to determine the piezometric levels and compositional variability. Field measurements in 2020 are designed to obtain and survey new groundwater wells that have been drilled on the distal periphery of the Utah FORGE pro...
Kirby, S. Utah Geological Survey
Sep 30, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Data for 3-D Model Development Lithology, Temperature, Pressure, and Stress
This submission comprises two downloadable .zip archives. Each archive contains spreadsheets with 3-D data and a .txt document describing the data. The Mesh Files .zip download contains data regarding the lithologic contacts of the granitoid and overlying sedimentary basin fill. T...
Podgorney, R. Idaho National Laboratory
Mar 17, 2020
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 InSAR Study Results
Ground movement is evaluated through analysis of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) interferograms. Results indicate there has been no detectable ground movement at millimeter scale. The zipped file in this submission contains a report, maps, and results from the InS...
Feigl, K. and Batzli, S. Department of Geoscience University of Wisconsin-Madison
Sep 24, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 2-2439v2: Report on Predicting Far-Field Stresses Using Finite Element Modeling and Near-Wellbore Machine Learning for Well 16A(78)-32
This report presents the far-field stress predictions at two locations along the vertical section of Utah FORGE Well 16A (78)-32 using a physics-based thermo-poro-mechanical model. Three principal stresses in far-field were obtained by solving an inverse problem based on the near-...
Lu, G. et al University of Pittsburgh
Aug 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
2 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Microgravity Data
A 4D microgravity survey began in early 2019 in order to benchmark surface and subsurface elevations prior to Phase 3 drilling and stimulation campaigns. Microgravity stations are collocated with GPS deformation benchmarks and use the same location survey data. Surveys are underta...
Hardwick, C. Utah Geological Survey
Oct 07, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Native State Model 2022 Update
This is the Phase 3 native state model update. The Phase 3 numerical model represents a significant subsurface volume below the FORGE site footprint. The model domain of 4.0 km x 4.0 km x 4.2 km is located approximately between depths of 4000 to 4200 meters below land surface. Thi...
Podgorney, R. and Liu, R. Idaho National Laboratory
Jul 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE 3-2417: Well 16B(78)-32 Fiber-Optic Cable Installation Report
This is an installation report detailing placement of the integrated fiber-optic cable behind casing in Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32. These activities occurred in July of 2023 immediately after the drilling of 16B. This report was prepared by the FOGMORE R&D project (Fiber Optic MOn...
Ajo-Franklin, J. et al Rice University
May 15, 2024
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
1 Resources
0 Stars
Curated
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report
This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices i...
Moore, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Dec 11, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible